California refuses to extradite doctor over abortion pill: 'Not today. Not ever'

California Stands Firm: Refusal to Extradite Doctor Indicted for Mailing Abortion Pills Over 'Not Today, Not Ever'

In a move that has sent shockwaves through the US abortion landscape, California Governor Gavin Newsom announced on Wednesday that his state will not extradite doctor Remy Coeytaux, who faces indictment in Louisiana over allegations of mailing abortion pills into the southern state.

The decision comes as part of a growing trend among blue states to protect their abortion providers from out-of-state extradition and prosecution. In 2022, California passed a shield law, joining a handful of other states that have taken similar measures to safeguard reproductive health care services.

Newsom's stance on the matter is unequivocal: "Louisiana's request is denied. We will not allow extremist politicians from other states to reach into California and try to punish doctors based on allegations that they provided reproductive health care services. Not today. Not ever."

The move has sparked outrage among abortion opponents, who argue that shield laws are illegal and that the protection afforded to abortion providers in certain states is a threat to public safety. However, supporters of these laws see them as essential measures to safeguard women's right to choose.

At the heart of this controversy is Dr. Remy Coeytaux, who allegedly mailed pills through Aid Access, an organization that provides access to abortion services nationwide. Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill has announced plans to seek Coeytaux's extradition, citing a state law that bans "criminal abortion by means of abortion-inducing drugs".

But the documents released by Murrill's office do not indicate that the woman who received pills from Coeytaux was coerced into terminating her pregnancy. The case is further complicated by allegations made against another doctor, Margaret Carpenter, who was previously sought for extradition over similar allegations in New York.

The standoff between California and Louisiana serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing battle over abortion rights in the United States. As the landscape continues to shift, one thing remains clear: the future of reproductive health care services hangs precariously in the balance, with states like California standing firm against what they see as extreme attempts to undermine these essential services.
 
California's gotta protect its own ๐ŸŒด๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš•๏ธ Shield laws are a no-go for out-of-state politicians trying to bully docs into silence ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ Louisiana's got its own issues with reproductive rights, maybe focus on fixing those instead of targeting others? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
I'm low-key relieved that California is not going to extradite Dr Coeytaux ๐Ÿ™Œ. I mean, can you imagine if this was a slippery slope? Next thing you know, they'll be after docs in other states for 'just' providing reproductive health care services... it's just too much. What's next, trying to shut down healthcare clinics over access to birth control pills? ๐Ÿคฏ It's like, we get it, there are differing opinions on the matter, but let's not forget that abortion is a fundamental right for many people in this country ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ. I'm all about states' rights and local autonomy, but when it comes to reproductive health care, California is standing up for what they believe in, even if others don't ๐Ÿ‘.
 
I'm thinking... this is a big deal ๐Ÿค”. I mean, I knew CA was gonna stand up for its docs but still. It's crazy how the gov's handling this situation... it feels like they're trying to play politics with people's lives. I don't think it's right that a doc's being persecuted just 'cause they're helping women get the care they need. And what about the organization, Aid Access? They're just doing their job and providing services to people who need them. It's not like they're promoting abortion or anything... ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
"An informed citizen is the only true guarantee of liberty." ๐Ÿค”๐ŸŒŸ It's crazy how some ppl think they can just impose their laws on others and get away with it. The fact that CA stood up for Dr. Coeytaux shows that there are still people willing to fight for what's right, even when the odds are against them. Maybe we should all take a page from Abraham Lincoln's book: "Government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth." ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ’ช
 
๐Ÿค” I'm all for California standing up for its own, you know? Remy Coeytaux is just trying to do his job and help women get the care they need. It's not right that he's being targeted by Louisiana over this one incident. Shield laws are definitely necessary in these kinds of situations - it's a gray area when it comes to abortion, and we can't have docs being harassed like this. ๐Ÿš‘ Coeytaux is actually doing some good work with Aid Access, providing much-needed support for people who can't get care elsewhere. The fact that Louisiana is going after him like this just shows they're not on board with reproductive rights... ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ Like seriously, can't Louisiana just chill? I mean, I get it, abortion is a big deal, but come on, doctor's gotta have some freedom too. It's like, one day you're all "pro-life" and the next you're trying to send docs to jail for doing their job... ๐Ÿคฏ California's stance is kinda justified though, states shouldn't be interfering with each other's healthcare decisions. But Louisiana's just being extra by using a law that basically doesn't even exist... and now it's all drama ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ. Can we just have some actual legislation instead of this back-and-forth? ๐Ÿ™„
 
I'm totally gutted by this news ๐Ÿค•. I mean, who gets to dictate where doctors can and can't practice? It's like they're playing God over women's bodies ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ. I've got a friend who had an abortion in California last year, and she was literally shaking with fear the whole time, worried that she'd be arrested for getting care. It's just not right ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ.

And what really gets me is how extreme some of these politicians are getting. Like, I get it, people have strong opinions on this stuff, but there has to be a way to do it without trying to punish people for doing their jobs ๐Ÿ’ธ. As a society, we should be supporting doctors who provide life-saving care, not demonizing them ๐Ÿค.

I'm watching this whole thing unfold with bated breath, wondering what the next move will be ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ. One thing's for sure, though: I'll be cheering on California and all the other blue states that are standing up for reproductive rights ๐Ÿ’ช.
 
I gotta say, I'm kinda feeling hopeful about this whole situation ๐ŸŒŸ. I know some ppl are gonna freak out 'cause CA isn't extraditing Dr Coeytaux, but honestly, I think it's a major win for reproductive rights ๐Ÿคฉ. Shield laws in blue states like CA are just what we need to protect docs from gettin bullied by politicians who wanna control people's bodies ๐Ÿšซ. And let's be real, the fact that another doc (Margaret Carpenter) is also being targeted shows how far some ppl will go to restrict access to healthcare ๐Ÿคฏ. So yeah, California standin firm against Louisiana's extremism is like a breath of fresh air ๐Ÿ’จ - here's hopin this sparks a national conversation about reproductive rights and not just be a footnote in the abortion debate ๐Ÿ“š.
 
๐Ÿคฏ this is so crazy ๐Ÿคฏ - i mean i get it from their perspective but can't we just have some standard laws or something? ๐Ÿ™„ california is basically saying they won't turn over a doctor who's being investigated for allegedly sending medication to people who wanted an abortion. what if that woman wasnt even 18? ๐Ÿค” or had a legitimate reason for wanting the pills? it feels like states are just trying to outdo each other in terms of being "abortion-friendly" and i'm just worried about the potential consequences...
 
Man, this whole thing got me thinking... what's the true cost of 'extremist' politicians trying to control people's bodies? Is it really about public safety or is it just a way to further their own agendas? California's stance on this is like, a big middle finger to the status quo. It's like they're saying "no" to the idea that the government should dictate what happens inside our own homes. And honestly, I think we should be having these conversations about reproductive rights all the time... it's not just about abortion pills or shield laws, it's about what it means to be a human being and make choices for ourselves ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ’ก
 
I don't trust these new laws protecting abortion docs... it's just a slippery slope ๐Ÿค”. One state makes a move and next thing you know, everyone's trying to create their own shield laws. What's next? States making laws about what foods are or aren't allowed in hospitals? It seems like they're more concerned with keeping the politicians happy than actually helping people. And what's with this "extremist politicians" nonsense? It's just a bunch of folks with different opinions... ๐Ÿ™„
 
The US is really getting into a heated abortion debate right now ๐Ÿค•. I think it's super concerning that some politicians are trying to extradite doctors who provide reproductive health care services. It's not just about the law, but also about women's rights and safety ๐Ÿšจ. California's decision to stand firm on this issue is actually really inspiring ๐Ÿ’ช - we need more states to take a stance like that! The fact that other blue states have already passed shield laws shows that there's a growing momentum for protecting reproductive health care services ๐Ÿ’ผ.

I'm also worried about the lack of clarity around the documents released by Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill. If the woman who received pills from Dr. Coeytaux wasn't coerced into terminating her pregnancy, then why is this doctor being targeted? ๐Ÿค” It just seems like there's a lot of misinformation and fear-mongering going on here ๐Ÿ˜’.

Overall, I think it's really unfortunate that we're having to debate whether or not doctors who provide reproductive health care services should be punished. Can't we just focus on providing safe and accessible healthcare to women everywhere? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
๐Ÿค” This is so crazy! I mean, what's going on here? One minute you're living your life and trying to make choices about your own body, and the next thing you know there are politicians from other states trying to shut down access to abortion pills just because they don't agree with it. Like, that's not how it works, right? ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ

And can we talk about California standing up for what's right here? I love that Gavin Newsom is like "nope, not today" to this whole thing. It's amazing to see a governor taking a stand against extremism and fighting for women's rights. ๐Ÿ’ช The shield law is such a great idea - it's all about protecting people who are just trying to do their job without fear of prosecution.

But at the same time, I can see why some people would be outraged. It feels like we're being pitted against each other on this issue, and that's not okay. We need to find a way to work together and respect each other's differences. ๐Ÿ’•
 
[Image of a woman holding an abortion pill with a red "X" through it] ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’Š๐Ÿ˜’

[ GIF of a politician with a shocked face ] ๐Ÿ˜ฎ๐Ÿค”

[A picture of the US map with California marked as a shield symbol] ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿฝ๐ŸŒด

[GIF of a doctor in a white coat with a stethoscope around their neck, giving a thumbs up] ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ’Š
 
omg I'm literally torn about this ๐Ÿคฏ... on one hand I feel so bad for Dr. Coeytaux and all the other docs who are being targeted by these anti-abortion politicians, but on the other hand I think it's kinda crazy that California is refusing to extradite him over laws that seem super flawed ๐Ÿค”. like shouldn't they just follow federal law or something? ๐Ÿšซ at the same time I get why CA is doing this - they're basically saying 'hey, we've got this' and trying to protect women's rights to choose ๐ŸŒŸ... but what if it sets a bad precedent for other states? ๐Ÿ˜ฌ
 
๐Ÿคฏ I'm low-key concerned about this doc's situation, tbh ๐Ÿ™. Shield laws are meant to protect ppl who provide vital healthcare services, not create a legal nightmare ๐Ÿšซ. As someone who's always stressed about layout and formatting, I can imagine how frustrating it must be for these docs to deal with all the red tape ๐Ÿ“. Can't we just focus on getting ppl access to quality healthcare without all the drama? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ It's not like they're doing anything wrong... ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
๐Ÿค” gotta say, this is getting crazy. Californians are basically saying that if you're a doctor providing abortion services and someone reports you, good luck getting extradited from Cali. It's like they're putting up a big neon sign saying "we've got your back, doc". ๐ŸŒŸ Newsom's stance might be seen as a bold move to protect reproductive health care services, but it also raises questions about where the line gets drawn. Can you really just mail someone abortion pills and expect them not to get in trouble? ๐Ÿ’Š It's all so... complicated. And what's with this back-and-forth between Cali and Louisiana? It feels like they're playing a high-stakes game of "let's see who can be the most radical". ๐Ÿค I guess only time will tell how this whole thing plays out, but one thing's for sure - it's gonna be a wild ride. ๐Ÿ’ฅ
 
omg u guys i am literally shaking rn i just found out that california is not extraditing dr coeytaux ๐Ÿคฏ his case is so messed up and it's crazy that louisiana is trying to punish him for doing his job i mean we all know that abortion pills should be accessible to women who need them most but seriously, how can they claim he was trying to "punish" people when the woman who got the pills wasn't even coerced into terminating her pregnancy? and what's with this whole thing being so politicized lol it feels like they're trying to silence doctors who are just trying to help women ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
Back
Top