The US president's power to deploy troops under the Insurrection Act would be a game-changer for law enforcement and public order in cities like Minneapolis. The rarely used law allows presidents to invoke active-duty soldiers, not just National Guard members, with courts granting more latitude than they might otherwise.
Critics worry that Mr Trump will use this power to quell any protests or demonstrations, including those involving immigration issues. However, the Insurrection Act's application in such cases would require a careful reading of the law and would likely be met with lawsuits.
President Trump has made several threats under this act to invoke active-duty soldiers, not just National Guard members, with courts granting more latitude than they might otherwise. The last time it was invoked was in 1992 during the Los Angeles riots that followed the acquittal of four police officers charged with beating Rodney King.
Critics worry that Mr Trump will use this power to quell any protests or demonstrations, including those involving immigration issues. However, the Insurrection Act's application in such cases would require a careful reading of the law and would likely be met with lawsuits.
President Trump has made several threats under this act to invoke active-duty soldiers, not just National Guard members, with courts granting more latitude than they might otherwise. The last time it was invoked was in 1992 during the Los Angeles riots that followed the acquittal of four police officers charged with beating Rodney King.
. If Mr Trump can just send in active-duty soldiers to deal with protests, it sounds like a recipe for disaster! I mean, we've seen what happens when the National Guard gets involved (remember Ferguson and Minneapolis?), and adding regular army guys into the mix is like pouring gasoline on a fire 
.
. I hope courts will really scrutinize the law and prevent any abuses of power... we need clear guidelines here 
. And yeah, it's cool how this law has only been invoked once before in '92... totally not a recipe for disaster 
. imagine being able to just send in active duty soldiers whenever the president feels like it? that's some scary stuff... not sure how much actual control it would give law enforcement but i'm sure it would be used as a last resort lol. what's next, federal troops on every city's streets for every little thing? 
. I mean, I get that cities are struggling with public order and all, but isn't there already enough of a militarization vibe going on? 
. I mean, can you imagine if Trump decides to deploy troops to quell protests like this? It's a huge power grab and it's not hard to see how this could get messy, especially with all the lawsuits flying around. I'm thinking some people might feel super uncomfortable knowing that active-duty soldiers are on the streets, keeping tabs on protesters. On the flip side, I guess it's good to know that courts are granting more latitude than usual for these kinds of situations... but still, Trump's track record doesn't exactly fill me with confidence 
I can feel the anxiety and concern about this new power President Trump is trying to wield 
. Deploying active-duty soldiers to cities for domestic unrest might lead to some pretty intense situations 
.
. It's also worrying to think that there might be lawsuits filed against the government if they do use this power inappropriately 
.
. We need to make sure that our voices are heard and that everyone has access to peaceful protest and assembly without fear of military intervention 
.
It's not like it'd solve anything but would def make for some entertaining news vids 
. But for real tho, the potential for abuse is huge - what about peaceful activists who just wanna express themselves? 
We need to keep a close eye on this one 
I'm not sure if President Trump will use this power, but it's good to know it's an option. 
But it's also a reminder of how important it is to have laws in place for situations like this. 
Maybe it'll lead to better solutions for law enforcement and public order. 
One thing's for sure, it's not gonna be easy to figure out when to use this power... 
I'm thinking about how this law can be used to address protests and demonstrations in a country where police brutality is still an issue, like Minneapolis 
waiting to happen. The idea that President Trump would use this power to suppress protests is just ridiculous, like he'd ever let that happen. But even if he didn't, the fact remains that this law basically gives him an carte blanche to do whatever he wants with our military. I mean, what's next? Deploying troops to fix potholes on Main St? It's a total abuse of power and needs to be taken away from the president ASAP 
The LA riots thing is like, super ancient history, but still, it's wild to think that the US president can basically declare war on American citizens if they're marching for their rights 
.
but on the other hand, it's also good that it gives cities some more options when it comes to dealing with protests and public order issues... i guess we'll just have to wait and see how this all plays out 
