Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney is poised to greenlight a massive new oil pipeline project, sending shockwaves through the country's First Nations communities who fear another devastating environmental disaster on par with the notorious 2016 Nathan E Stewart oil spill.
The prospect of large oil tankers traversing treacherous waters off the coast of British Columbia has sparked outrage among Coastal First Nations, who insist that an oil tanker ban must remain in place to safeguard their way of life. They argue that the risks outweigh any potential economic benefits, particularly when compared to the catastrophic consequences of a single incident like the Nathan E Stewart grounding.
The Heiltsuk Nation, whose community of Bella Bella was just 10 nautical miles from the grounding site, is still reeling from the aftermath of the spill, which saw 110,000 liters of diesel oil spilled into the sea. The ecological damage has been irreparable, with invasive species thriving in the disturbed ecosystem.
The pipeline project would allow for the transportation of at least one million barrels a day to Asia, posing an enormous threat to this already fragile environment. Many are warning that the risks associated with shipping oil through such treacherous conditions cannot be ignored.
"We've been fighting for justice through this colonial legal system and it's really a process of 'show me your receipts'," said Marilynn Slett, chief councillor of the Heiltsuk Nation. "But how do you show a receipt for the loss of our ability to transmit our knowledge and our cultural practices between generations?"
The UN's international marine organization has been lobbied by the Heiltsuk delegation in an effort to secure changes to maritime law, which currently excludes them from compensation for cultural losses.
David Eby, BC Premier, is also adamant that the tanker ban must remain intact, citing the risks of an oil spill and its devastating economic consequences. "Scraping the ban would be a grave mistake," he warned.
As Canada wrestles with the demands of both environmental protection and economic growth, it remains to be seen whether Prime Minister Carney will heed the warnings of Coastal First Nations or push forward with plans for this contentious pipeline project.
The prospect of large oil tankers traversing treacherous waters off the coast of British Columbia has sparked outrage among Coastal First Nations, who insist that an oil tanker ban must remain in place to safeguard their way of life. They argue that the risks outweigh any potential economic benefits, particularly when compared to the catastrophic consequences of a single incident like the Nathan E Stewart grounding.
The Heiltsuk Nation, whose community of Bella Bella was just 10 nautical miles from the grounding site, is still reeling from the aftermath of the spill, which saw 110,000 liters of diesel oil spilled into the sea. The ecological damage has been irreparable, with invasive species thriving in the disturbed ecosystem.
The pipeline project would allow for the transportation of at least one million barrels a day to Asia, posing an enormous threat to this already fragile environment. Many are warning that the risks associated with shipping oil through such treacherous conditions cannot be ignored.
"We've been fighting for justice through this colonial legal system and it's really a process of 'show me your receipts'," said Marilynn Slett, chief councillor of the Heiltsuk Nation. "But how do you show a receipt for the loss of our ability to transmit our knowledge and our cultural practices between generations?"
The UN's international marine organization has been lobbied by the Heiltsuk delegation in an effort to secure changes to maritime law, which currently excludes them from compensation for cultural losses.
David Eby, BC Premier, is also adamant that the tanker ban must remain intact, citing the risks of an oil spill and its devastating economic consequences. "Scraping the ban would be a grave mistake," he warned.
As Canada wrestles with the demands of both environmental protection and economic growth, it remains to be seen whether Prime Minister Carney will heed the warnings of Coastal First Nations or push forward with plans for this contentious pipeline project.