Hero or Hider: The Complexities of Human Response in Crisis
A recent attack on train passengers in Cambridgeshire has left many wondering how they would react if faced with a similar situation. Would you risk your life to help others, or would you flee? While some may imagine themselves as heroes, willing to confront danger head-on, others may anticipate flight, prioritizing their own survival above all else.
The reality is far more nuanced. According to Emma Kavanagh, a psychologist who has worked with police and military personnel, the human response to crisis situations is shaped by our individual experiences, mental models, and sense of self. For some, a pre-existing schema of behavior may incline them towards heroic actions, while for others, it may lead to flight.
Research suggests that the body's natural responses to danger are far from straightforward. While the "fight or flight" response is often cited as our primary reaction, the human brain also has an innate drive to "tend and befriend," a desire to connect with and support those around us in times of need. This urge can manifest in unexpected ways, such as rushing towards danger in search of loved ones.
The key to unlocking our potential as helpers lies not in denying our natural fear response but rather in recognizing its limits. Once we have removed ourselves from immediate danger, we are often presented with new opportunities to offer aid and support to those around us. This is where the "tend and befriend" response truly comes into play.
Kavanagh's work highlights that having a pre-existing schema of behavior can significantly impact our actions in crisis situations. Those who have experienced previous emergencies may find themselves better equipped to handle future challenges, while others may struggle to adapt. Additionally, one's sense of identity and purpose can greatly influence their response to crisis.
Perhaps the most important thing to remember is that it's okay not to be okay. In the aftermath of trauma, survivors may experience intense emotions and difficulty processing their experiences. While some may benefit from additional support, many will find that time allows them to heal and rebuild.
Ultimately, the ability to respond heroically or hide in fear is not mutually exclusive. Both reactions can be valuable, depending on the circumstances. By recognizing our complexities as humans and acknowledging the intricate web of factors that shape our responses, we may uncover new ways to support each other in times of need.
A recent attack on train passengers in Cambridgeshire has left many wondering how they would react if faced with a similar situation. Would you risk your life to help others, or would you flee? While some may imagine themselves as heroes, willing to confront danger head-on, others may anticipate flight, prioritizing their own survival above all else.
The reality is far more nuanced. According to Emma Kavanagh, a psychologist who has worked with police and military personnel, the human response to crisis situations is shaped by our individual experiences, mental models, and sense of self. For some, a pre-existing schema of behavior may incline them towards heroic actions, while for others, it may lead to flight.
Research suggests that the body's natural responses to danger are far from straightforward. While the "fight or flight" response is often cited as our primary reaction, the human brain also has an innate drive to "tend and befriend," a desire to connect with and support those around us in times of need. This urge can manifest in unexpected ways, such as rushing towards danger in search of loved ones.
The key to unlocking our potential as helpers lies not in denying our natural fear response but rather in recognizing its limits. Once we have removed ourselves from immediate danger, we are often presented with new opportunities to offer aid and support to those around us. This is where the "tend and befriend" response truly comes into play.
Kavanagh's work highlights that having a pre-existing schema of behavior can significantly impact our actions in crisis situations. Those who have experienced previous emergencies may find themselves better equipped to handle future challenges, while others may struggle to adapt. Additionally, one's sense of identity and purpose can greatly influence their response to crisis.
Perhaps the most important thing to remember is that it's okay not to be okay. In the aftermath of trauma, survivors may experience intense emotions and difficulty processing their experiences. While some may benefit from additional support, many will find that time allows them to heal and rebuild.
Ultimately, the ability to respond heroically or hide in fear is not mutually exclusive. Both reactions can be valuable, depending on the circumstances. By recognizing our complexities as humans and acknowledging the intricate web of factors that shape our responses, we may uncover new ways to support each other in times of need.