I'm kinda surprised by this decision 
. I mean, hepatitis B can lead to some serious health issues if not treated properly. Guess it's good they're considering individualized approaches now tho 
. But what's the harm in vaccinating newborns against something that's relatively easy to prevent? Maybe we should be looking at other diseases too? Don't wanna see a lot of kids getting sick because their parents are worried about side effects or whatever 
. I mean, hepatitis B can lead to some serious health issues if not treated properly. Guess it's good they're considering individualized approaches now tho . But what's the harm in vaccinating newborns against something that's relatively easy to prevent? Maybe we should be looking at other diseases too? Don't wanna see a lot of kids getting sick because their parents are worried about side effects or whatever 
... especially those who can't afford or don't have access to healthcare. The ACIP says we gotta weigh the risks and benefits, but what about when we don't know what the risks are? 
At least now we'll get an initial dose at 2 months old, I guess that's something. Fingers crossed this whole thing gets reviewed by Jim O'Neill and some sense comes out of it 
. I guess it's all about weighing the risks vs benefits, right? 
but what about those who can't afford the consultation or guidance? 
It's not like it's gonna be the end of the world if someone doesn't get the shot right away. And what's with all these extra considerations about exposure to people with hepatitis B? I feel like it's just gonna lead to parents stressing out even more about their kid's health. But hey, at least there's an option for them to consult their doc and make a decision...