Charity watchdog opens inquiry into City & Guilds' sale of business arm

Charity Watchdog Launches Probe into City & Guilds' Lavish Privatization

The Charity Commission has embarked on a statutory inquiry into the £180m sale of City & Guilds' qualifications awards business to private company PeopleCert last year. The inquiry follows reports that the charity's executives were showered with multi-million pound bonuses following the deal, which also saw the business embark on a £22m cost-cutting drive and significantly reduce its UK workforce.

At the heart of the controversy is City & Guilds' outgoing chief executive Kirstie Donnelly, who received a £1.7m award, as well as finance director Abid Ismail, who earned £1.2m. Both executives also saw significant increases in their salaries: Donnelly's pay packet was boosted by £100,000 to around £430,000, while Ismail's salary rose by 30% to approximately £300,000.

The Charity Commission stated its intention to investigate a range of concerns, including the sale and bonuses awarded to executives. The inquiry will also review information provided to the commission regarding the sale, as well as the decision-making process behind it. This includes whether the charity's trustees were adequately informed about the proposed deal and how they navigated regulatory requirements.

Critics have questioned the transparency surrounding the sale and its impact on the charity's charitable objectives. The Charity Commission has acknowledged the concerns raised by public reports and is committed to maintaining public trust. However, with the private business arm of City & Guilds boasting significant profits following the privatization, critics argue that accountability must be maintained to ensure these vast sums are being used for the greater good.

As part of its investigation, the Charity Commission may expand the scope of its inquiry if additional regulatory issues emerge. The commission previously received assurances from the charity about its decision-making process but ultimately deemed the sale not to require its regulatory consent.
 
omg I cant believe what's going on at city & guilds 🤯 they r making execs get multi million pound bonuses while the UK workforce gets reduced by 22 million and yet they still dont seem to care about their charitable objectives 🙄 its like they r more interested in lining their pockets than helping ppl gain skills and qualifications

i think it's time for some real accountability here 💯 if the charity commission cant do anything, maybe someone else should take a closer look at what's going on 👀
 
I'm kinda worried about this one 🤔... £180m for a business and the execs are getting multi-million pound bonuses? It just doesn't sit right with me 😒. I mean, I get that charity execs should be fairly compensated, but £1.7m and £1.2m is just steep 💸. And what about the impact on the workforce? 22 million pounds in cost cuts? That's a lot of jobs lost 💔. Can't we just have more transparency around these deals so we can make sure they align with the charity's goals? Transparency is key, right? 🤗
 
.. can't believe City & Guilds got away with this shady deal 🤔. I mean, £180m for a qualifications awards business? That's just crazy talk! And what really gets my goat is those execs raking in multi-million pound bonuses while the UK workforce gets whacked and costs get cut 🤑💸. It's like they're more interested in lining their own pockets than doing some good for education 📚. The Charity Commission needs to dig deeper and make sure everyone's playing by the rules, especially when it comes to transparency 🔍. This privatization thing is just a recipe for disaster 🤯...
 
🤔 This whole thing got me thinking... what happens when we allow the pursuit of profit to cloud our moral judgment? We're talking about a charity here, supposed to be dedicated to helping others, and they're raking in the cash from a privatization deal that's leaving many wondering if it was all just about lining their own pockets. 💸 The fact that these execs were showered with multi-million pound bonuses raises some serious questions about accountability and transparency... is it really that hard for us to keep track of who's profiting from what? 🤷‍♀️ And what does this say about our values as a society if we're okay with this kind of deal-making in the name of charity? 🤔
 
🤔 I'm calling BS on this one... £1.7m for Kirstie Donnelly? That's just crazy talk! What exactly did she do to warrant such a massive bonus? And what about the £22m cost-cutting drive that saw UK workers get the boot? Is it really okay to sacrifice all those people's livelihoods for some fancy sale price?

I need to see the contracts, I need to see the spreadsheets, and I need to see some hard numbers on where exactly this massive profit is going. The Charity Commission needs to do more than just "acknowledge concerns" - they need to get to the bottom of this.

This whole thing reeks of a cover-up, if you ask me... 🤑
 
🤔 this whole thing is kinda fishy... £1.7m and £1.2m bonuses for a couple of execs, that's some serious cash 💸 meanwhile the rest of us are just trying to get by 💪 city & guilds is supposed to be a charity, but it sounds like those in charge are more worried about lining their own pockets than doing any actual good 🤷‍♀️ gotta keep an eye on this one 👀
 
I'm getting a bit worried about this City & Guilds thing 🤔. They're basically selling off their awards business for a pretty penny and then giving their top execs massive bonuses? It just doesn't sit right with me, you know? I mean, I get that they need to make some cash, but £180m is a lot of dosh! 💸 And on top of that, they're cutting costs and reducing staff in the UK? That's not exactly what I'd call charity work 🤷‍♂️. The Charity Commission needs to dig deep into this one and figure out what really went down. Transparency is key here, and if there's even a whiff of something fishy, they need to take action 💪. Can't have the big guys just getting off scot-free while the rest of us are left wondering where our donations are going 🤷‍♂️.
 
OMG!!! 🤯 This is just so messed up! £1.7m bonus for Kirstie Donnelly?? 🤑 That's just insane!! And Abid Ismail getting a 30% pay rise too? 🚫 It looks like the executives were more interested in lining their own pockets than helping out the charity they were supposed to be working for. I mean, what's the point of even having a Charity Commission if they can't keep tabs on these kinds of things?! 🤷‍♀️ The fact that there's been a £22m cost-cutting drive and significant job losses too? It just shows how callous they were being with people's livelihoods. This investigation better be thorough or it'll be a complete waste of time... 😒
 
I think it's super messed up that City & Guilds' top execs were getting these massive bonuses after selling off their business to a private company 🤔. Like, isn't the whole point of being a charity to use those funds for good causes? 🙅‍♀️ They're just raking it in while people's livelihoods are being cut and costs are dropping left and right 💸.

It's not like they can just hand over to some faceless corporate entity and say "oh, don't worry, we'll make sure the profits get to the poor" 🙄. No way, that's just not how it works 💔. The Charity Commission needs to really dig deep and find out what went down here 👀, 'cause this whole thing smells like some serious fishy business 🐟.

I mean, I'm all for charities making money, but when the people at the top are getting so much of it while everyone else is suffering, something's gotta give 💪. The public needs to know that their donations are being used effectively and not just lining the pockets of a few power-hungry execs 🤦‍♀️.
 
just gotta wonder why they think £1.7m and £1.2m bonuses are okay tho 🤑🤔... like, what's the logic behind giving execs that kinda cash after just selling off a charity's business? shouldn't be about personal gain over helping people learn new skills 🤷‍♀️... and yeah, transparency is key here... gotta keep an eye on these big bucks to make sure they're being used for good 👀💸
 
Back
Top