Conservative lawmakers in several US states are pushing for taxes on adult content, sparking concerns that these measures could infringe upon free speech rights. In recent months, Alabama became the first state to impose a 10% tax on porn sites, following the passage of age-verification laws requiring users to provide ID or personal documentation before accessing explicit content.
Utah lawmakers have proposed similar legislation, which would enforce a 7% tax on total receipts from adult entertainment companies and impose an annual fee of $500. The revenue generated by these taxes is set to be used for mental health services targeting young people. Critics argue that such measures are unconstitutional, as they single out protected speech for disfavored treatment.
The push for porn taxes comes amid a broader trend of conservative lawmakers redefining the issue around underage exposure to adult content. In 2022, a report from Common Sense Media found that 73% of teens aged 13-17 have accessed adult content online, often through social media platforms like X and Snap.
Industry experts argue that porn taxes could disproportionately affect sex workers and creators who rely on these platforms for income. "A government tax on speech limits that right to those who can afford it," says Mike Stabile, director of public policy at the Free Speech Coalition.
Critics also point out that such measures do not address the root causes of underage exposure to explicit content, which is often facilitated by social media platforms' inadequate age verification processes. "Age restriction is a very complex subject that brings with it data privacy concerns and the potential for uneven and inconsistent application," notes Evelyn Douek, an associate professor of law at Stanford Law School.
As lawmakers work to reframe the issue around underage harm, many experts warn against setting a precedent for government power to restrict certain forms of protected speech. "When we talk about free speech, we generally mean the freedom to speak, the ability to speak freely without government interference," says Douek.
Utah lawmakers have proposed similar legislation, which would enforce a 7% tax on total receipts from adult entertainment companies and impose an annual fee of $500. The revenue generated by these taxes is set to be used for mental health services targeting young people. Critics argue that such measures are unconstitutional, as they single out protected speech for disfavored treatment.
The push for porn taxes comes amid a broader trend of conservative lawmakers redefining the issue around underage exposure to adult content. In 2022, a report from Common Sense Media found that 73% of teens aged 13-17 have accessed adult content online, often through social media platforms like X and Snap.
Industry experts argue that porn taxes could disproportionately affect sex workers and creators who rely on these platforms for income. "A government tax on speech limits that right to those who can afford it," says Mike Stabile, director of public policy at the Free Speech Coalition.
Critics also point out that such measures do not address the root causes of underage exposure to explicit content, which is often facilitated by social media platforms' inadequate age verification processes. "Age restriction is a very complex subject that brings with it data privacy concerns and the potential for uneven and inconsistent application," notes Evelyn Douek, an associate professor of law at Stanford Law School.
As lawmakers work to reframe the issue around underage harm, many experts warn against setting a precedent for government power to restrict certain forms of protected speech. "When we talk about free speech, we generally mean the freedom to speak, the ability to speak freely without government interference," says Douek.
I gotta say, this whole porn tax thing is a bit of a slippery slope, you know? It's one thing to regulate age verification, but taxes on adult content? That just feels like an overreach to me. And let's be real, who's really gonna enforce these taxes without causing a huge headache for creators and sex workers? 
I'm not saying they shouldn't pay their fair share of taxes, but this is a whole different ball game.
I'm not sure anyone's got all the answers here, but it feels like lawmakers are gonna have a tough time finding that sweet spot between regulating harm and respecting free speech.
. And what about the sex workers and creators who rely on these platforms for income? Do we really want to punish them just because their work isn't everyone's cup of tea? 
A tax on speech is kinda weird though...I mean, shouldn't we be worried about governments controlling what we say and do instead? 
- like, I get that it's supposed to help mental health services for young people and all, but is it really the best way to do it? It feels like they're trying to control what we watch online without considering the bigger picture 
. It's like, when do we draw the line? Where does it end? 
.
.
. Social media platforms' inadequate age verification processes are a major contributor to this issue, and it's essential to address these concerns through regulation rather than taxation 
These lawmakers are trying to control what people watch online and it's just not right 
.
.
also, isn't the whole point of adult content that people can access it without being forced to see it? seems like a slippery slope where gov just keeps taking more and more control 
. I mean, what's considered "protected speech" these days? Is it just sex workers and creators who are talking about their services online, or does that apply to everyone else too? 
It feels like we're creating a slippery slope where any old topic can be censored if lawmakers don't like it 
.
. It's just about finding that balance and making sure we're not infringing on anyone's rights in the process 
.