Congress has only two months to make a crucial decision about the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), a law at the center of Edward Snowden's leaks. The law, which allows for warrantless surveillance of Americans, is set to expire on April 20.
Both parties have been jockeying over FISA, but the Trump administration has taken a particularly hands-off approach. Despite being asked about FISA reforms during a confirmation hearing, President Donald Trump's nominee to serve as National Security Agency director, Lt. Gen. Joshua Rudd, dodged the question.
The White House claims it is working behind the scenes on FISA reform, but its lack of transparency has led to criticism from Democrats. Even Republican lawmakers are concerned about the administration's silence on the issue.
The law in question allows for "backdoor" searches of a massive database of foreign intelligence gathered by the NSA. Critics argue that this provision undermines civil liberties and requires a court-approved warrant before conducting such searches.
Democrats who voted for FISA two years ago are now under pressure to support a warrant requirement, while Republicans who supported reforms during Biden's presidency may flip back to supporting sweeping powers for the executive branch.
The fate of FISA is uncertain, with some lawmakers suggesting that Congress may try to "kick the can" on reform. The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments and the erosion of democracy, and understands the importance of press freedom in defending against such threats.
As the deadline for renewing FISA's Section 702 approaches, it remains to be seen whether the Trump administration will take a firm stance on reform or continue its efforts to erode civil liberties.
Both parties have been jockeying over FISA, but the Trump administration has taken a particularly hands-off approach. Despite being asked about FISA reforms during a confirmation hearing, President Donald Trump's nominee to serve as National Security Agency director, Lt. Gen. Joshua Rudd, dodged the question.
The White House claims it is working behind the scenes on FISA reform, but its lack of transparency has led to criticism from Democrats. Even Republican lawmakers are concerned about the administration's silence on the issue.
The law in question allows for "backdoor" searches of a massive database of foreign intelligence gathered by the NSA. Critics argue that this provision undermines civil liberties and requires a court-approved warrant before conducting such searches.
Democrats who voted for FISA two years ago are now under pressure to support a warrant requirement, while Republicans who supported reforms during Biden's presidency may flip back to supporting sweeping powers for the executive branch.
The fate of FISA is uncertain, with some lawmakers suggesting that Congress may try to "kick the can" on reform. The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments and the erosion of democracy, and understands the importance of press freedom in defending against such threats.
As the deadline for renewing FISA's Section 702 approaches, it remains to be seen whether the Trump administration will take a firm stance on reform or continue its efforts to erode civil liberties.