In a harsh reality that highlights the unforgiving nature of a system designed to process asylum seekers, individuals on the Pacific island of Nauru are struggling to survive on meager stipends. The weekly allowance of $115 per person may seem paltry compared to the rising costs of everyday essentials like fruit and vegetables.
The Australian government's decision to prohibit asylum seekers from working while their application is being processed has created a Catch-22 situation, leaving many without a means to earn a living wage. A bag of grapes can cost up to $20 on Nauru, while small boxes of cereal retail for $15 β making it nearly impossible for those with limited finances to afford basic necessities.
For some, the stress of uncertainty is compounded by fear of deportation back to their home countries, where they claim to have fled persecution and violence. A sense of desperation lingers in the eyes of one asylum seeker, who fears that if deported, his family will also meet an untimely demise.
As experts point out, the situation is "unconscionable" and highlights a need for accountability on the part of Australia's government. The country's commitment to upholding non-refoulement rights under international law raises questions about its responsibility in ensuring the basic human dignity of those it has sent to Nauru for processing.
With living expenses continuing to rise, asylum seekers are forced to make impossible choices between survival and well-being. As Ogy Simic, advocacy head of the Asylum Seekers Resource Centre, aptly put it, "We cannot outsource accountability... If Australia sends people to Nauru, then Australia must ensure they have the right to work, the means to survive, and basic human dignity."
The Australian government's decision to prohibit asylum seekers from working while their application is being processed has created a Catch-22 situation, leaving many without a means to earn a living wage. A bag of grapes can cost up to $20 on Nauru, while small boxes of cereal retail for $15 β making it nearly impossible for those with limited finances to afford basic necessities.
For some, the stress of uncertainty is compounded by fear of deportation back to their home countries, where they claim to have fled persecution and violence. A sense of desperation lingers in the eyes of one asylum seeker, who fears that if deported, his family will also meet an untimely demise.
As experts point out, the situation is "unconscionable" and highlights a need for accountability on the part of Australia's government. The country's commitment to upholding non-refoulement rights under international law raises questions about its responsibility in ensuring the basic human dignity of those it has sent to Nauru for processing.
With living expenses continuing to rise, asylum seekers are forced to make impossible choices between survival and well-being. As Ogy Simic, advocacy head of the Asylum Seekers Resource Centre, aptly put it, "We cannot outsource accountability... If Australia sends people to Nauru, then Australia must ensure they have the right to work, the means to survive, and basic human dignity."