Senior Detroit Department of Transportation officials have been found to have abused their authority by shielding employees who disrupted bus service due to a "romantic interaction" between two staff members. The investigation, conducted by the Detroit Office of Inspector General (OIG), revealed that Senior Transportation Service Inspector Andre Reece and bus driver Dayna Ruff had engaged in an inappropriate intimate relationship, resulting in a 115-minute disruption of services.
The misconduct, which included falsely reporting mechanical problems and abandoning a running bus, was classified as a Class IV offense under the department's disciplinary system. However, Superintendent of Operations Howard Bragg III issued only five-day suspensions to both employees, despite the availability of surveillance video that documented their actions.
What's more troubling is that Bragg failed to conduct a proper investigation before issuing discipline, and no evidence suggests that either employee requested a hearing or that any mitigating circumstances were formally considered. This lack of accountability has serious consequences for riders who rely on DDOT buses to get to work, school, medical appointments, and childcare.
The OIG report also revealed broader systemic problems within the department, including failures in disciplinary practices employed by the Operations Management Team. The investigators concluded that these practices are not compliant or consistent with the disciplinary policies mandated by the 2008 Detroit Department of Transportation Employee Handbook.
In a striking display of bureaucratic dysfunction, Assistant Director of Operations Andre Mallett was accused of abusing his authority by allowing lenient discipline to stand even after learning that additional video evidence substantiated the complaint. The OIG recommended significant reforms to ensure future investigations are thorough, transparent, and consistent with written policy.
The fallout from this scandal is particularly egregious in a city like Detroit, where roughly one-third of residents do not have access to a car and rely heavily on DDOT buses to get around. Service disruptions of more than an hour can have far-reaching consequences for these riders, who already face chronic delays.
In response to the OIG's draft report, Bragg and Mallett argued that human resources officials advised that discharge was not warranted and that re-issuing discipline would violate procedural fairness. However, the OIG rejected these claims, finding that required video evidence was available at the time and that the handbook's mandatory penalties were ignored without justification.
Ultimately, the report concludes that DDOT should create a system of procedures to allow more oversight over the review and issuing of discipline, ensuring that discipline is proportionate to the offense and all policies are followed.
The misconduct, which included falsely reporting mechanical problems and abandoning a running bus, was classified as a Class IV offense under the department's disciplinary system. However, Superintendent of Operations Howard Bragg III issued only five-day suspensions to both employees, despite the availability of surveillance video that documented their actions.
What's more troubling is that Bragg failed to conduct a proper investigation before issuing discipline, and no evidence suggests that either employee requested a hearing or that any mitigating circumstances were formally considered. This lack of accountability has serious consequences for riders who rely on DDOT buses to get to work, school, medical appointments, and childcare.
The OIG report also revealed broader systemic problems within the department, including failures in disciplinary practices employed by the Operations Management Team. The investigators concluded that these practices are not compliant or consistent with the disciplinary policies mandated by the 2008 Detroit Department of Transportation Employee Handbook.
In a striking display of bureaucratic dysfunction, Assistant Director of Operations Andre Mallett was accused of abusing his authority by allowing lenient discipline to stand even after learning that additional video evidence substantiated the complaint. The OIG recommended significant reforms to ensure future investigations are thorough, transparent, and consistent with written policy.
The fallout from this scandal is particularly egregious in a city like Detroit, where roughly one-third of residents do not have access to a car and rely heavily on DDOT buses to get around. Service disruptions of more than an hour can have far-reaching consequences for these riders, who already face chronic delays.
In response to the OIG's draft report, Bragg and Mallett argued that human resources officials advised that discharge was not warranted and that re-issuing discipline would violate procedural fairness. However, the OIG rejected these claims, finding that required video evidence was available at the time and that the handbook's mandatory penalties were ignored without justification.
Ultimately, the report concludes that DDOT should create a system of procedures to allow more oversight over the review and issuing of discipline, ensuring that discipline is proportionate to the offense and all policies are followed.