Over 500 DOJ Reviewers Pour Over Epstein Files, Claim Substantial Progress Made
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has tasked over 500 prosecutors and staff with reviewing millions of files linked to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. The agency claims to have made "substantial progress" in the review process, despite widespread criticism that it is taking too long.
According to a letter sent to two federal judges, hundreds of reviewers are working around the clock to review and redact "millions of pages of materials" related to Epstein's case. The effort requires constant technical assistance due to the sheer volume of documents involved.
The review process has found significant duplication in various files, officials said. However, the estimated number of remaining documents and photos remains uncertain, according to the letter.
DOJ officials are focused on releasing materials under the Epstein Files Transparency Act as soon as possible while protecting victim privacy. The act requires the agency to turn over all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials related to Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.
Since the law took effect in December, President Trump's DOJ has released only 12,285 documents, comprising around 125,575 pages of investigative materials on its Epstein Library webpage. This is a tiny fraction of the estimated two million files still being reviewed.
Several lawmakers have called for the prompt release of all investigative materials, accusing the DOJ of committing "criminal violations" and Attorney General Pam Bondi of failing to comply with measures laid out in the bill. Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) requested a special master to oversee the release.
The delayed release has raised concerns about the potential for ongoing court cases to be compromised. However, officials have said that protecting victims' privacy is crucial in this process.
In December, a file dump revealed shocking photos of Epstein with high-profile politicians and A-list stars, including Bill Clinton and Mick Jagger. Neither Clinton nor Trump has been accused of any wrongdoing related to Epstein.
The review process has also led to some technical issues, such as redactions that have raised eyebrows among tech-savvy sleuths. Some reviewers have found ways to uncensor heavily redacted files by copying them from Adobe Acrobat and pasting them into a word processor.
The release of the complete trove of documents remains uncertain, with officials offering no indication when it will be made available.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has tasked over 500 prosecutors and staff with reviewing millions of files linked to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. The agency claims to have made "substantial progress" in the review process, despite widespread criticism that it is taking too long.
According to a letter sent to two federal judges, hundreds of reviewers are working around the clock to review and redact "millions of pages of materials" related to Epstein's case. The effort requires constant technical assistance due to the sheer volume of documents involved.
The review process has found significant duplication in various files, officials said. However, the estimated number of remaining documents and photos remains uncertain, according to the letter.
DOJ officials are focused on releasing materials under the Epstein Files Transparency Act as soon as possible while protecting victim privacy. The act requires the agency to turn over all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials related to Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.
Since the law took effect in December, President Trump's DOJ has released only 12,285 documents, comprising around 125,575 pages of investigative materials on its Epstein Library webpage. This is a tiny fraction of the estimated two million files still being reviewed.
Several lawmakers have called for the prompt release of all investigative materials, accusing the DOJ of committing "criminal violations" and Attorney General Pam Bondi of failing to comply with measures laid out in the bill. Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) requested a special master to oversee the release.
The delayed release has raised concerns about the potential for ongoing court cases to be compromised. However, officials have said that protecting victims' privacy is crucial in this process.
In December, a file dump revealed shocking photos of Epstein with high-profile politicians and A-list stars, including Bill Clinton and Mick Jagger. Neither Clinton nor Trump has been accused of any wrongdoing related to Epstein.
The review process has also led to some technical issues, such as redactions that have raised eyebrows among tech-savvy sleuths. Some reviewers have found ways to uncensor heavily redacted files by copying them from Adobe Acrobat and pasting them into a word processor.
The release of the complete trove of documents remains uncertain, with officials offering no indication when it will be made available.