EasyJet's Refusal To Honour Promise Leaves Passenger Out Of Pocket By £472
A UK-based passenger claims that EasyJet refused to honour its promise of a £472 refund following a disruption at Gatwick airport last July. The chaos was caused by an air traffic control outage which resulted in hundreds of flights being cancelled or delayed, including the passenger's scheduled flight to Budapest.
When the passenger arrived at check-in, they were informed that their original flight had been downgraded and a smaller aircraft would be used instead. This meant 35 passengers would not be able to board the plane. Despite being told by EasyJet staff to book another flight and claim the cost of the new ticket via the airline's website, it refused to refund the passenger for the difference.
In an astonishing turn of events, customer service staff denied that the aircraft had been downgraded before rejecting the passenger's claim on the grounds that they had booked their original flight through a third-party travel agent. They also told the passenger they were a no-show, when in fact they had simply not boarded due to the airline's mistake.
The air traffic control incident has left many passengers with significant travel disruptions and costs. EasyJet's handling of the situation is seen as 'obdurate' by some critics, who have expressed frustration at the airline's failure to provide clear explanations or honour its promise.
One passenger told EasyJet that their claim was rejected due to an incorrect email address on their booking being not matching the one on record, a claim that has been disputed by the airline. The real reason for the rejection appears to be that the airline's system marked the passenger as a 'no-show' after they failed to proceed with check-in and boarding.
EasyJet was forced to reconsider its stance and offer the refund four months after the passenger first lodged their complaint. However, it took an additional month for the refund to arrive, after the airline insisted on proof of payment which had already been made by the third-party travel agent.
In conclusion, EasyJet's inflexible system and indifferent staff left a passenger out of pocket by £472. A more robust and customer-focused approach would be in order to prevent such incidents from happening in the future.
A UK-based passenger claims that EasyJet refused to honour its promise of a £472 refund following a disruption at Gatwick airport last July. The chaos was caused by an air traffic control outage which resulted in hundreds of flights being cancelled or delayed, including the passenger's scheduled flight to Budapest.
When the passenger arrived at check-in, they were informed that their original flight had been downgraded and a smaller aircraft would be used instead. This meant 35 passengers would not be able to board the plane. Despite being told by EasyJet staff to book another flight and claim the cost of the new ticket via the airline's website, it refused to refund the passenger for the difference.
In an astonishing turn of events, customer service staff denied that the aircraft had been downgraded before rejecting the passenger's claim on the grounds that they had booked their original flight through a third-party travel agent. They also told the passenger they were a no-show, when in fact they had simply not boarded due to the airline's mistake.
The air traffic control incident has left many passengers with significant travel disruptions and costs. EasyJet's handling of the situation is seen as 'obdurate' by some critics, who have expressed frustration at the airline's failure to provide clear explanations or honour its promise.
One passenger told EasyJet that their claim was rejected due to an incorrect email address on their booking being not matching the one on record, a claim that has been disputed by the airline. The real reason for the rejection appears to be that the airline's system marked the passenger as a 'no-show' after they failed to proceed with check-in and boarding.
EasyJet was forced to reconsider its stance and offer the refund four months after the passenger first lodged their complaint. However, it took an additional month for the refund to arrive, after the airline insisted on proof of payment which had already been made by the third-party travel agent.
In conclusion, EasyJet's inflexible system and indifferent staff left a passenger out of pocket by £472. A more robust and customer-focused approach would be in order to prevent such incidents from happening in the future.