Elon Musk's Twitter Purge: A Tale of Selective Enforcement
In a move that has left many confused, Elon Musk's Twitter purge of blue check marks did not go as planned. The billionaire entrepreneur had announced that he would be "winding down" the coveted verification feature for high-profile users on April 1, in an effort to push them towards his Twitter Blue subscription service, which costs $8 per month.
However, instead of targeting most legacy blue check holders, Musk singled out a single account from The New York Times. The main account for the publication lost its blue check over the weekend, while its other accounts, such as those for its arts and books content, remained verified.
The move has raised eyebrows among experts, who point out that the new label appended to legacy blue check holders could make it easier for scammers to impersonate high-profile users. The changes also appear to be guided by whims rather than policy, with Musk often using his platform to lash out at journalists and media outlets.
Musk's long campaign against "legacy" blue checks has been ongoing since he took over Twitter last fall. However, the recent move has highlighted how the billionaire's approach to decision-making is often unpredictable and prone to causing confusion among users.
The new label appended to legacy blue check holders reads: "This account is verified because it's subscribed to Twitter Blue or is a legacy verified account." This language makes it unclear whether verified accounts are actually notable individuals or simply users who have paid for verification, which could potentially undermine the purpose of the feature altogether.
While Musk has claimed that his changes will treat everyone equally, critics argue that the new system creates a two-tiered approach to verification, with some users paying for blue checks and others not. The move also raises concerns about revenue generation, as Musk seeks to drive income from his Twitter Blue subscription service.
In conclusion, Elon Musk's Twitter purge of blue check marks was supposed to be a way of promoting his new subscription service, but instead it has highlighted the unpredictability of his decision-making process and the potential risks of creating confusion among users.
In a move that has left many confused, Elon Musk's Twitter purge of blue check marks did not go as planned. The billionaire entrepreneur had announced that he would be "winding down" the coveted verification feature for high-profile users on April 1, in an effort to push them towards his Twitter Blue subscription service, which costs $8 per month.
However, instead of targeting most legacy blue check holders, Musk singled out a single account from The New York Times. The main account for the publication lost its blue check over the weekend, while its other accounts, such as those for its arts and books content, remained verified.
The move has raised eyebrows among experts, who point out that the new label appended to legacy blue check holders could make it easier for scammers to impersonate high-profile users. The changes also appear to be guided by whims rather than policy, with Musk often using his platform to lash out at journalists and media outlets.
Musk's long campaign against "legacy" blue checks has been ongoing since he took over Twitter last fall. However, the recent move has highlighted how the billionaire's approach to decision-making is often unpredictable and prone to causing confusion among users.
The new label appended to legacy blue check holders reads: "This account is verified because it's subscribed to Twitter Blue or is a legacy verified account." This language makes it unclear whether verified accounts are actually notable individuals or simply users who have paid for verification, which could potentially undermine the purpose of the feature altogether.
While Musk has claimed that his changes will treat everyone equally, critics argue that the new system creates a two-tiered approach to verification, with some users paying for blue checks and others not. The move also raises concerns about revenue generation, as Musk seeks to drive income from his Twitter Blue subscription service.
In conclusion, Elon Musk's Twitter purge of blue check marks was supposed to be a way of promoting his new subscription service, but instead it has highlighted the unpredictability of his decision-making process and the potential risks of creating confusion among users.
he's got this whole verification thing down pat, but then he goes and targets that one nyt account for no reason 
meanwhile, all them other legacy blue check holders are just chillin', thinkin they're still good to go 
the new label is straight up confusing tho, like is it 'cause you paid for it or what? 
anyway, musk's just tryna drive income from twitter blue, but honestly, it feels like he's just messin' with people now 
... it just feels like more spam than anything else 
.
newsflash dude: if u wanna be a good admin, just don't change rules mid-stream lol. now we got legacy blue check holders who are all confused cuz they still got their checks but the label is all wrong 
like wut's up? 
, but if musk can't even figure out his own system, that's just sad 
"notable individuals" lol get real. It's like he's tryna create a whole new level of fake news 
I don't know about anyone else but this whole thing just feels like another one of his weird twittr rants 
. Like, I get it, he wants to make money off his subs, but singling out The New York Times' main account and not touching its other accounts just doesn't add up 
. I mean, what even is the point of paying to have your name on a verified list anymore?
. What's next, huh? Will he just start deleting accounts left and right without warning? It's all very... unpredictable 
. I'm all for innovation and disruption, but sometimes you gotta take a step back and reassess before you make some crazy moves 
.
. Some ppl paid for it and some didnt, that's not fair 
. I mean I get wanting to sell Twitter Blue and all but this move is gonna drive users crazy 
. And what about the legit journalists and accounts? Do they have to pay now too $$$?! No way 
. I mean, who needs a blue check when you can just shell out $8/month? It sounds like a money grab to me 
. It's like he's playing favorites or something 
... and now I'm worried about my own verified account getting hacked 
. I'm not saying Elon is a bad guy, but this whole thing just feels like a big mess 
. He's been saying one thing and doing another for ages, like he's playing some kinda game with Twitter users' minds 
. And now we're stuck with this two-tier system, where you can pay to be verified or not... it just doesn't make sense, right? 
#MuskOnTwitter #BlueCheckMarkControversy #TwitterPurge
.
. It's like he's trying to drive traffic to his service, but at the same time, it could create more problems than solutions 
. What if scammers start impersonating legit accounts because of this new label? That'd be super bad news 
. Anyway, I'm just gonna sit back and wait for him to clarify what's going on 
This whole thing is just a recipe for disaster. Can't Elon just make up his mind and stick to it? 