The article discusses the current state of strikers in English football, particularly with regards to the lack of depth and quality behind Harry Kane. The main points are:
* Alan Shearer and Chris Sutton argue that England has a "massive problem" when it comes to finding suitable strikers.
* They point out that teams like Blackburn Rovers in the 1990s had an incredible depth of quality at striker, but England's current crop is not comparable.
* Sutton notes that modern-day wide forwards like Rashford and Saka are scoring more goals than old-school wingers ever did, but they're not replacing traditional strikers.
* Owen feels that he would not be considered as a striker if he emerged now due to the changes in the game and the focus on creative players off the wide areas.
* Shearer and Sutton agree that playing with two strikers is not an option for England this week, but it's a viable strategy in other games.
The article highlights the challenges facing English football when it comes to finding reliable and skilled strikers. The lack of depth behind Kane means that teams are often relying on him to score goals, which can be a burden on the player and the team as a whole. The discussion also touches on the changes in the game and how players are being adapted to fit different roles, making it difficult for traditional strikers to thrive.
* Alan Shearer and Chris Sutton argue that England has a "massive problem" when it comes to finding suitable strikers.
* They point out that teams like Blackburn Rovers in the 1990s had an incredible depth of quality at striker, but England's current crop is not comparable.
* Sutton notes that modern-day wide forwards like Rashford and Saka are scoring more goals than old-school wingers ever did, but they're not replacing traditional strikers.
* Owen feels that he would not be considered as a striker if he emerged now due to the changes in the game and the focus on creative players off the wide areas.
* Shearer and Sutton agree that playing with two strikers is not an option for England this week, but it's a viable strategy in other games.
The article highlights the challenges facing English football when it comes to finding reliable and skilled strikers. The lack of depth behind Kane means that teams are often relying on him to score goals, which can be a burden on the player and the team as a whole. The discussion also touches on the changes in the game and how players are being adapted to fit different roles, making it difficult for traditional strikers to thrive.
i mean i get what alan shearer and chris Sutton are sayin but like come on guys its not that simple anymore football has changed so much since the 90s now we gotta play with pacey wingers who can score goals from wide areas and still maintain some sort of defensive solidity 
England's striker crisis is sounding like a classic Tory conundrum – we've got the money, but where's the talent? 
I mean, look at the state of our youth development system – it's all about flashy wide forwards and creative midfielders, but what about the next generation of strikers? We need to invest in grassroots programs that focus on developing proper goal-scorers, not just players who can score a few hat-tricks from outside the box 
. It's like we're trying to be a modern-day Arsenal without investing in our own academy 
. We need a long-term plan that prioritizes building a strong striker pool, not just relying on one superstar player to carry us through every game 
️.
like in the old days at blackburn rovers. it's not all about having this one superstar player scoring all the goals, it's a team effort. and let's be real, most of these young players like rashford and saka are just as important to their teams as kane is to england... 
. Like, have you seen some of these teams play? They're just relying on Kane and Rashford to score all the goals... what about the rest of the squad?! It's not like they're being completely rubbish or anything. And yeah, playing with two strikers isn't always a bad idea - it can actually be really effective if done right 
. It's not like he's wrong, it's just... nuanced. And let's be real, teams have been "struggling" with strikers for ages and they've still managed to win games 
. England's got this!
I've seen some of these young guys come through the ranks and they're not even being considered as strikers! What's going on? 
They're all about the wide forwards now, which is cool and all, but someone needs to be up front scoring goals. And it's not just Kane, what about Raheem Sterling or Marcus Rashford? Can't we have a team that can call upon multiple players to get us goals? 
. And what about when he's injured? You can't just have Rashford and Saka scoring all the goals on their own, it's not sustainable 
. The sad thing is, players like Shearer and Sutton who know what they're talking about are saying the same stuff we're thinking 
.
And honestly, I dont think thats a sustainable model for success.
. And teams are like, "oh, we'll just play with two defenders and hope one of them scores" 
. No way, that's not gonna cut it in big games. They need someone who can create chances for themselves and others. It's like, where did all these talented forwards go? 
.