ESA considers righting the wrongs of Ariane 6 by turning it into a Franken-rocket

ESA's 'Franken-Rocket' Proposal: Can a Revamped Ariane 6 Catch Up to the Cutting Edge of Launch Industry?

In an effort to right the wrongs of its struggling Ariane 6 program, the European Space Agency (ESA) is considering a radical proposal to turn the rocket into a "Franken-rocket" with reusable liquid-fueled boosters. The plan, announced in late 2024, aims to breathe new life into the aging rocket and bring it up to speed with the latest advancements in the launch industry.

The concept, spearheaded by ArianeGroup, a joint venture between Airbus and Safran, involves replacing the Ariane 6's solid-fueled side boosters with new liquid-fueled boosters. These would be developed by MaiaSpace, a French subsidiary of ArianeGroup working on its own partially reusable small satellite launcher. The boosters would provide a significant cost savings and increase launch rates for the Ariane 6.

However, the feasibility of this plan is highly uncertain. One major hurdle is recovering the Ariane 6's core stage, which is difficult due to its long burn time and single engine design. Additionally, the rocket's payload shroud and upper stage are also not reusable, adding complexity to the proposal.

Despite these challenges, swapping out solid rocket motors for liquid boosters makes economic sense for ArianeGroup. The company hopes to gain rapid experience in landing and reusing rockets with this proposal, which would double or quadruple the flight test data available from a single booster per Ariane 6 launch.

Critics argue that this plan is simply trying to catch up to where the European space industry was 10-15 years ago, rather than keeping pace with international competitors like SpaceX and Blue Origin. The Ariane 6 remains significantly behind in terms of technology, and it's unclear whether even a revamped rocket can close the gap.

The ESA's BEST! initiative, which aims to develop reusable launchers for European space transportation, is moving forward with ArianeGroup's proposal. However, it will require significant investment and technological advancements to make this concept a reality.

In the end, the success of this plan hinges on whether the ESA can overcome the technical hurdles and stay ahead of the competition in rocketry. Only time will tell if the 'Franken-rocket' revival will prove successful or remain a footnote in European space history.
 
idk about dis... ESA thinks it's genius to turn an old rocket into a new one with some slapped together boosters lol what makes them think that's gonna be enough? SpaceX and Blue Origin have been pushing the boundaries of rocket tech for years now, and they're not just gonna sit back and let ESA catch up. I mean, sure, saving money on solid fuels is cool and all, but can they really make it reusable too? seems like a long shot to me.
 
I gotta say, I'm all about innovation in space tech πŸš€πŸ’‘. The ESA's idea to revamp the Ariane 6 with reusable boosters sounds like a game-changer for their launch industry. However, it's defo not without its challenges 😬. Recovering the core stage is a major hurdle and it's gonna take some serious tech advancements to make that work πŸ’».

I think the ESA needs to be realistic about their goals though πŸ€”. They can't just catch up with SpaceX and Blue Origin overnight ⏱️. Those guys have been pushing the boundaries of rocketry for years and it's gonna take a lot more than just a revamped Ariane 6 to close the gap.

Still, I love that they're thinking outside the box πŸ“¦. Reusable launchers are the future of space travel and if anyone can make it happen, it's the ESA πŸ’ͺ. They just need to stay focused, invest in the right tech, and keep pushing forward πŸ”₯.
 
πŸš€πŸ’‘ I think the ESA's proposal for a Franken-Rocket is a solid attempt to revamp their Ariane 6 program πŸ€”. Swapping out those old solid rocket motors for liquid boosters would make it way more cost-effective and efficient πŸ’Έ. The idea of reusing boosters, even if only partially, could give them an edge over the competition πŸ†. But, let's be real, catching up to SpaceX and Blue Origin isn't gonna be easy 🚫. They're like rockets in a different league πŸ˜…. Still, I'm curious to see how this whole thing plays out πŸ”. Will they be able to overcome those technical hurdles? Only time will tell ⏰
 
Meh... think ESA should just ditch Ariane 6 altogether πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ, get some fresh talent on board and start from scratch. Been struggling for too long, costs too much... don't wanna be stuck playing catch-up with SpaceX all day 😐.
 
πŸš€πŸ’₯ I'm not sure about this "Franken-rocket" idea, but the numbers are crazy 🀯! We're talking 70% cost reduction and double launch rates πŸ’ΈπŸš€ with these new liquid boosters... that's a game-changer for ArianeGroup πŸ‘. But, on the other hand, they need to get those reusable core stages figured out ASAP ⏰ or it'll just be another expensive space program πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ.

Speaking of which, have you seen this graph showing the launch frequency of Ariane 6 vs. SpaceX? πŸ“ˆ It's like night and day! The ESA needs to bring its A-game (or should I say, A-boosters πŸ˜‰) if it wants to compete with these guys πŸš€πŸ’₯.

And let's not forget about the environmental impact 🌎. If they can make this "Franken-rocket" thing work, it could be a major win for sustainability in space exploration πŸ™Œ. But we'll have to wait and see... Fingers crossed! πŸ‘
 
I think the ESA is trying to do something smart here πŸ€”. They're not giving up on Ariane 6 and they want to make it more competitive, especially with SpaceX and Blue Origin πŸ”₯. I mean, we've all seen what those guys can do, right? πŸš€ But, I don't think this plan is a total disaster πŸ˜…. Replacing solid boosters with liquid ones could be a game changer, plus they'd save some serious cash πŸ’Έ.

The problem is, it's not going to be easy 🀯. Recovering the core stage and all that jazz is gonna take some serious tech advancements πŸ”§. But, if they can pull it off, it'll be worth it πŸŽ‰. We've seen what happened with reusable rockets in the US, it's a whole new ball game ⚽️.

I'm actually kinda excited to see where this goes πŸ’₯. It's not like they're just throwing good money after bad πŸ’Έ. They want to stay competitive and that's something we can get behind πŸ™Œ. Fingers crossed they make it work πŸ‘!
 
I dont think its that complicated they just need to invest more money and resources into it, thats what happens with any tech advancements πŸ€‘ its not like theyre trying to revive an old car from the 90s, they can update and upgrade it to make it relevant again πŸš€

I mean, SpaceX and Blue Origin are killing it right now, but that just means there's room for someone else to innovate too. The ESA should be proud of even trying to stay competitive πŸ’ͺ

The 'Franken-rocket' concept might sound weird at first, but if its gonna save the Ariane 6 program from being a total waste, then I'm all for it 🀝
 
I'm so hyped for the ESA's proposed Franken-Rocket revamp πŸš€πŸ’₯! With those reusable liquid-fueled boosters, we're talking about a potential 2x to 4x increase in launch rates for Ariane 6 πŸ’ͺ. That's huge!

As you can see from the chart, the cost savings on these boosters would be massive - we're looking at around €50-60 million per launch, compared to the current solid-fueled side boosters which cost more like €70-80 million πŸ“ˆ.

Now I know some folks might say that this plan is too little, too late πŸ’”, but I think it's all about catching up with the global leaders in rocketry. As you can see from this graph of launch frequency, Ariane 6 has been lagging behind SpaceX and Blue Origin for years πŸ“Š.

But if anyone thought they had a free pass to innovate, think again! The ESA is putting significant investment into the BEST! initiative, which aims to develop reusable launchers. That's gotta be seen as a bold move πŸ’Έ.

Of course, with great power comes great risk πŸ€”. We need to see some solid data on this Franken-Rocket concept before we can get excited about it. But I'm rooting for ArianeGroup - if anyone can make this work, they can! πŸš€πŸ’ͺ

By the way, did you know that MaiaSpace is already working on a partially reusable small satellite launcher? That's some crazy tech right there πŸ”₯.

Anyway, let's keep an eye on this developing story and see how it plays out!
 
idk why they're revamping it now lol πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ like what took them so long to get it right? and 10-15 yrs ago is ancient tech lol blue origin's been doing liquid boosters for ages πŸš€ and espacex is all about innovation not just copying others πŸ’Έ
 
The ESA's gotta try something right? Like, they went from being the "I'm-a-space-agency-I-can-do-everything" to the "We're-still-struggling-but-we-gonna-reboot-with-this-Franken-rocket" πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. But seriously, can they actually make this work without losing their shirt? Swapping out solid boosters for liquid ones is a good idea, but recovering that core stage is gonna be like trying to catch a greased pig at the county fair – it's just not gonna happen easily πŸ˜‚. And don't even get me started on competing with SpaceX and Blue Origin... they're like the rocket equivalent of Tesla vs Ferrari πŸš€πŸ’¨. The ESA needs to step up their game if they wanna keep pace, but I'm rooting for them anyway πŸ’ͺ.
 
Ugh, I'm so done with theseESA proposals πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ they're always trying to catch up with the big boys like SpaceX and Blue Origin but honestly it's like they're stuck in neutral 😴. Replacing solid rocket motors with liquid boosters is a good idea, I guess, but recovering the core stage is a whole different story 🚧. It's gonna be super expensive and time-consuming to figure out how to make that work. And what's with the BEST! initiative? Sounds like just another fancy name for "we're trying to fix our broken rocket program" πŸ˜’. Can't they just focus on developing something new instead of trying to revive an old one? It's all so predictable πŸ™„
 
omg u think esa is 4gettin about da new tech? they gotta step up their game if wanna compete w/ spacex & blue origian lol i no its hard, but havin reusable boosters would be super helpful πŸš€πŸ’Έ i dont no if its a good idea or not, but at least dey tryin πŸ‘
 
πŸ€” I dont think it matters how much money they put into this project, if its not gonna make sense technically then its just waste of resources. Like, we all know the ESA has been struggling to get the Ariane 6 right and now they wanna try to turn it into some kinda Frankenstein rocket? πŸš€ It sounds like a cop-out to me. If they really want to compete with SpaceX and Blue Origin, they need to invest in new tech, not just slap some new engines on an old design.
 
idk why esa is even botherin with this Franken-rocket plan lol it's like they're tryin to revive an old dead tech πŸ˜‚ the whole point is to keep up with spacenix and blue orig, but honestly i think it's gonna be too late for them, ain't nobody got time 4 their outdated rocket πŸš€πŸ’₯
 
OMG, I'm like literally so nervous about this whole thing 🀯... I mean, I've been following this Ariane 6 saga for ages and I just can't even believe they're considering reviving it like this πŸ™ˆ. But at the same time, the thought of those liquid-fueled boosters and reusable technology is like, super exciting? πŸ˜† I know some ppl are saying it's a last-ditch effort to catch up with SpaceX & Blue Origin, but I think it's more about trying to stay relevant in the industry πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. And let's be real, who wouldn't want a revamped Ariane 6 to breathe new life into the ESA? 🌟 But seriously, I'm rooting for them... they gotta try something right? πŸ˜…
 
I think its cool that ESA is tryna breathe new life into Ariane 6 πŸš€πŸ’₯, even if its gonna be like a franken-rocket lol! They gotta stay competitive with SpaceX & Blue Origin, and this plan might just do the trick. I mean, who wouldn't want to cut costs and increase launch rates? πŸ’ΈπŸ“ˆ It's not like they're trying to go back in time or anything... they're just trying to catch up with the latest tech πŸ€”. And hey, if it means we get more European space missions done, then im all for it πŸš€πŸ’–. Let's keep our fingers crossed that ESA can pull this off and make Ariane 6 a force to be reckoned with again! πŸ‘
 
I dont get why they need to turn Ariane 6 into some kinda monster ( Franken-Rocket) πŸ€–... Its like fixing old car with new parts but still keep old engine πŸ˜‚. Isnt it better to start from scratch and make new rocket that can compete with SpaceX & Blue Origin? πŸš€πŸ’₯
 
I'm thinking its a bit weird that they wanna revamp the Ariane 6 like that πŸ€”... I mean, solid rocket motors are old tech, but liquid boosters? That's some next gen stuff πŸ’₯ We should be trying to catch up with SpaceX and Blue Origin, not playing catch-up on what they did 10-15 years ago πŸš€.
 
πŸš€πŸ‘€ So they wanna try to revive the Ariane 6 by turning it into some kinda "Franken-Rocket" with new liquid-fueled boosters πŸ€–! Sounds like a good idea, but gotta wonder if it's too little, too late πŸ˜…. They're trying to catch up to SpaceX and Blue Origin, which are already ahead of the game πŸ”₯.

Imagine this: they take an old rocket, slap on some new fancy boosters, and call it a day πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. It's like getting a new pair of wheels for an old car - maybe it'll work out, but probably not πŸ˜‚. They need to invest in some serious R&D if they wanna stay competitive.

Here's a simple diagram to sum up my thoughts:
```
+---------------+
| Current |
| Ariane 6 |
| (old tech) |
+---------------+
|
|
v
+---------------+
| New |
| Liquid-Fueled |
| Boosters |
| (hopefully new|
| tech) |
+---------------+
```
If it works out, they'll be ahead of the game πŸŽ‰. But if it's just a quick fix, they'll still be playing catch-up πŸ”΄. Fingers crossed for them! 😊
 
Back
Top