Ex-gambling bosses facing UK criminal trial lose civil case against regulator

UK regulators get a clean bill of health in court as two ex-gambling bosses fail to challenge their actions.

Kenny Alexander and Lee Feldman, former top executives at Entain, the parent company of Ladbrokes and Coral, have lost their civil case against the Gambling Commission over allegations that they breached their right to privacy. The regulator, which had intervened in their attempt to take control of 888, a major online casino operator, has been cleared of any wrongdoing.

The two men claimed that the commission's public statement about its review of 888's licence was an invasion of their privacy and caused them significant distress. However, Judge Mrs Justice Eady rejected this argument, ruling in favour of the Gambling Commission.

The case had sparked debate over the role of regulators in policing the industry and ensuring that companies comply with the law. The commission stated that it acted within its powers to address concerns about Alexander and Feldman's past roles at Entain, which was under investigation by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) over alleged bribery.

Alexander and Feldman are also facing criminal charges of fraud and bribery related to their time at Entain. Their trial is set to begin in 2028, alongside that of nine other defendants.

The two men plan to appeal against the court's decision, with a spokesperson saying they were "extremely disappointed" by the outcome.
 
πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ so what else did we expect? like, these guys try to take on a whole country and its regulatory body... good luck with that. πŸ™„ also, can't say I'm surprised they got shut down, considering all the shady dealings going on in the gambling industry πŸ€‘ it's just a matter of time before they get pinched for their crimes. 2028 can't come soon enough πŸ‘€
 
πŸ€” I'm kinda surprised by this ruling, you know? Like, isn't it right that regulators have to speak out if they're investigating something shady? I get that Kenny and Lee are upset about their past roles at Entain but c'mon, they can't just sue the commission for speaking up! πŸ™„ It's like trying to silence someone who's trying to do a good thing. The fact that they were planning to appeal is pretty interesting too... it'll be cool to see how that plays out in 2028 πŸ‘€
 
lol so like what's up with these guys trying to take down the Gambling Commission? πŸ€” They're literally getting roasted in court and now they wanna appeal... meanwhile, 888 is still gonna be owned by whoever wins their case πŸ˜‚. I'm not mad at the commission though, they just did their job and now they can't be sued for it πŸ‘. I mean, who doesn't love a good game of chance? 🎲
 
πŸ™„ so these guys thought they could just take down the Gambling Commission like it was some sorta joke? Newsflash: regulators have a job to do and they can't just be intimidated by rich dudes trying to cover their tracks. I mean, come on, you get caught up in some shady stuff with HMRC and then try to muscle in on someone else's territory? Not cool, Kenny and Lee. Not cool at all.

And honestly, it's not like the Gambling Commission was being secretive or anything - they were just doing their job. It's all about transparency and accountability, right? So yeah, I'm glad they got a clean bill of health... for now πŸ˜’
 
πŸ€” honestly, i'm not surprised about this outcome πŸ™ƒ. regulators are gonna be regulators no matter what 🚫. these guys had some shady dealings goin' on and they got caught πŸ”. can't just make up wild stories about the gov't and expect to win a case πŸ˜‚. gotta love how bold it is for them to take on a major regulator like this tho πŸ’ͺ. but i guess when you're tryin to weasel your way out of some serious charges πŸ€‘, sometimes the court ain't havin' it 🚫. gonna be interesting to see what happens next 🀯, but i'm still rootin for the gov't in this one πŸ‘
 
I feel so bad for these guys... I mean, I get why they'd be upset about the commission making public statements about them, but come on, you're in a high-profile industry and your past mistakes are gonna come back to haunt you πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. And now, not only do they have to deal with that, but also a whole lot of other legal troubles? It's just too much 😩. I think the commission did what it was supposed to do - keep an eye on these companies and make sure they're playing by the rules. It's like, you can't just hide behind a company umbrella if you've done something wrong 🚫. I'm all for giving people second chances, but when you've got power and influence, you gotta be held accountable πŸ’ͺ.
 
πŸ™„ so these guys Kenny and Lee thought they could just sue the regulators for invading their privacy over some public statement? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ newsflash: if you're in charge of a major online casino, your personal business is already kinda public info anyway 😏. and now they're gonna appeal? good luck with that, guys πŸ™„ - probably not like it's gonna change the outcome...
 
I gotta say, this case has got me thinking πŸ€”... Like, don't get me wrong, I'm all for these guys being held accountable for their actions, but the way the regulator went about it seems kinda harsh 😬. I mean, the commission was just doing its job, right? But at the same time, you can't blame them for wanting to defend themselves against allegations of wrongdoing.

It's like, when you're a CEO or whatever, you've got to expect that your past is gonna come back to haunt you πŸ™„. And yeah, maybe they did breach their right to privacy, but was it really necessary to go public with the whole thing? I don't know, man... seems like a bit of a slippery slope to me πŸ‘Ž

Anyway, I'm glad we got this cleared up in court, and I hope these guys are prepared for what's coming next 😬. Nine other defendants, dude? That's some serious drama 🀯
 
πŸ€” I mean, come on... these guys are trying to sue the Gambling Commission for doing their job? It's like, regulators gotta regulate, you know? They can't just let companies do whatever they want and then expect not to get in trouble when things go wrong. And btw, who tries to take control of another company just because they didn't like the way it was handled by the current CEO? πŸ€‘ https://www.theguardian.com/busines...ed-of-claims-over-alleged-invasion-of-privacy
 
man this is wild how can ppl be so greedy like they just did whatever they wanted & broke laws no wonder the regulator got off scot free it shows u can't just do whatever u want in ur industry πŸ€‘πŸ’Έ the thing is too much money & power can corrupt anyone guess whats next? 😬
 
I feel like regulators are kinda like the unsung heroes of society, you know? They're just trying to keep everything running smoothly and make sure everyone follows the rules. In this case, it sounds like Kenny and Lee were trying to pull a fast one on the Gambling Commission by claiming their right to privacy was violated... but Judge Eady wasn't having it πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. It's all about setting boundaries, you know? The commission is just doing its job, and if Kenny and Lee can't handle that, maybe they should've thought twice before trying to take control of 888 πŸ€‘. Anyway, this whole thing does highlight how important transparency and accountability are in the gaming industry... πŸ’‘
 
Back
Top