Two Trinidadian men, Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, were killed in a U.S. boat strike on October 14, 2025, leaving their families to seek justice for the "manifestly unlawful" killings. The family members of the victims have filed a lawsuit against the United States government under the Death on the High Seas Act and the Alien Tort Statute.
The lawsuit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other organizations, claiming that the U.S. military's actions were extrajudicial killings without due process. The plaintiffs argue that the U.S. government's claims of "non-international armed conflict" with designated terrorist organizations are not valid, as there is no actual armed conflict justifying the lethal attacks on boats in international waters.
According to the complaint, Joseph and Samaroo were killed while returning from Venezuela to their homes in Trinidad, where they were working on farms. The U.S. military claimed that the two men were involved with a designated terrorist organization, but the families of the victims dispute this claim, stating that there was no information linking them to such activities.
The lawsuit alleges that the U.S. government's actions are violations of international laws prohibiting extrajudicial killings and federal law prohibiting murder. The complaint notes that summary execution has long been recognized as a violation of customary international law.
The Intercept reports that this is not an isolated incident, but rather part of a larger campaign of attacks in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean, resulting in at least 126 civilian deaths. Experts argue that these strikes are illegal extrajudicial killings, as they involve deliberately targeting civilians, even those suspected of being involved with terrorist organizations.
The Trump administration's justification for these actions is based on a secret memorandum that provides legal cover for the lethal strikes, but critics argue that this does not render the patently illegal killings lawful.
The lawsuit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other organizations, claiming that the U.S. military's actions were extrajudicial killings without due process. The plaintiffs argue that the U.S. government's claims of "non-international armed conflict" with designated terrorist organizations are not valid, as there is no actual armed conflict justifying the lethal attacks on boats in international waters.
According to the complaint, Joseph and Samaroo were killed while returning from Venezuela to their homes in Trinidad, where they were working on farms. The U.S. military claimed that the two men were involved with a designated terrorist organization, but the families of the victims dispute this claim, stating that there was no information linking them to such activities.
The lawsuit alleges that the U.S. government's actions are violations of international laws prohibiting extrajudicial killings and federal law prohibiting murder. The complaint notes that summary execution has long been recognized as a violation of customary international law.
The Intercept reports that this is not an isolated incident, but rather part of a larger campaign of attacks in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean, resulting in at least 126 civilian deaths. Experts argue that these strikes are illegal extrajudicial killings, as they involve deliberately targeting civilians, even those suspected of being involved with terrorist organizations.
The Trump administration's justification for these actions is based on a secret memorandum that provides legal cover for the lethal strikes, but critics argue that this does not render the patently illegal killings lawful.