'Frankenstein', 'Nosferatu', and the Antidote to Hollywood's Franchise Obsession

The art of filmmaking has devolved into a commodity-driven industry where creativity takes a backseat to commercial success. The recent resurgence of classic horror remakes, such as Robert Eggers' "Nosferatu" and Guillermo del Toro's "Frankenstein," serves as a stark reminder that films can be more than just intellectual properties being leveraged for profit.

When these two iconic films were released, they didn't feel like rival contenders vying for supremacy. Instead, they stood tall as standalone works of art, each with its own unique vision and creative freedom. Eggers' "Nosferatu" thrived in the macabre, combining gothic atmosphere with sexual repression to create a meditation on acceptance, reconciliation, and redemption. On the other hand, del Toro's "Frankenstein" distilled horror into something deeply relatable: generational trauma and the burden of ending cycles of abuse.

These films shouldn't be pitted against each other in a futile attempt to declare which one is superior. Instead, they should be celebrated for their individuality and artistic merit. They represent a beacon of hope in an industry that often prioritizes commercial success over creative freedom.

The success of "Nosferatu" and "Frankenstein" serves as a blueprint for how pop culture films should be made. They remind us that creatives must be allowed to create, not forced into monotonous cycles of rehash and reheat. These films prove that remakes of classic horror can feel inspired and moving rather than exhausted.

As the industry continues to churn out new content, it's essential to remember that films should be works of art that tap into our collective psyche. They shouldn't just exist as filler for a streaming catalogue or numbers ticking upward on a release calendar. Instead, they should be creations that let the freak flag fly, unapologetically, and remind us why even pop culture films matter.

The future of filmmaking lies in embracing this approach. Works like Maggie Gyllenhaal's "The Bride!" and Eggers' own "Werwulf" promise to carry this momentum forward, treating monster movies as art rather than content. As we look to the horizon, it's clear that these films will be a reminder that creativity and artistic freedom are just as valuable as commercial success.
 
πŸŽ₯ I think the resurgence of classic horror remakes is actually a good thing? Like, people need something spooky to get them through the year πŸŒ‘...and if those old-school vibes bring back some nostalgia for a new generation, that's awesome πŸ’–. It's not about pitting one remake against the other, it's more like, let's celebrate the fact that filmmakers are experimenting with different styles and themes 🎨. And you know what? These films are doing just that...they're not just shallow rehashes of old ideas, they're actual works of art πŸ’«. Let's give credit where credit is due, and hope that more films follow suit by prioritizing creativity over commercial success πŸ™.
 
πŸŽ₯ "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" 😬. The fact that horror remakes are making waves suggests that there's still room for originality in the industry, and it's about time we prioritize creative freedom over commercial success! πŸ’Έ
 
I'm not sure about people trying to remake classic horror movies. I mean, don't get me wrong, if you can make something new out of it, that's cool... but when they do, you gotta wonder if it's gonna feel like a fresh take or just a cheap cash-in. πŸ€‘ I think what bothers me is how often these remakes end up feeling like two separate things: the original and its remake. It's like you can't fully appreciate the new one without comparing it to the old one. Can't they just make something that stands on its own for once? Like, I love Maggie Gyllenhaal's "The Bride!", but it feels like she was trying to put her own stamp on the genre rather than starting from scratch. And don't even get me started on how some of these remakes are getting released straight to streaming... what's the point of that? πŸ“Ί
 
I gotta say, I'm so over how many remakes come out every year πŸ™„. Like, can't they just let some original ideas breathe? I mean, don't get me wrong, "Nosferatu" and "Frankenstein" were sick, but it's the ones that didn't make headlines for being bold or innovative that are really important. What about all the underrated gems that get lost in the shuffle?! We need more films like "The Witch" (which I know isn't exactly a classic, but still πŸ€”) that actually take risks and push boundaries. Not just some watered-down, soulless cash-grab. Can we please have more movies that make us feel something? πŸ’₯
 
πŸŽ₯πŸ’­ I'm so tired of seeing old classics getting remade for the sake of money πŸ’ΈπŸ˜’ Like what's wrong with just leaving them alone? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ These new ones, though... "Nosferatu" and "Frankenstein" are giving me all the feels 😍 The gothic atmosphere in "Nosferatu" is EVERYTHING πŸ•·οΈ And del Toro's "Frankenstein" is like a masterclass on trauma and abuse πŸ’”πŸ‘»

We need more films that focus on storytelling, not just box office numbers πŸ“Š These movies are proof that remakes can be inspired and moving 🎬 Not just rehashed versions of old ideas πŸ”„ Let's celebrate individuality and artistic merit over commercial success πŸ’« The future of filmmaking is all about embracing creativity and freedom 🌟
 
I think its kinda wild how some filmmakers actually get to make stuff that means something to them without having to worry about making bank πŸ’Έ, you know? Its not always easy for artists to stay true to themselves when they're in a position where their career is tied to the box office πŸŽ₯. If more films like "Nosferatu" and "Frankenstein" become the norm, then I think we might actually start seeing some amazing stuff on screen πŸ‘»...
 
I think some of these classic horror remakes are really cool because they're like fresh versions of old stories πŸ€”. You can tell the creators had fun with them and put their own twist on it πŸ’‘. It's not all about making money, but also about bringing something new to the table πŸ“š. And I love how they focus on themes that we can really relate to, like trauma and acceptance πŸ€—. It's like the filmmakers are saying "hey, you don't have to just sit through some cheesy special effects, let's dig deeper" πŸ’₯. The industry needs more of this vibe, you know?
 
I mean, come on... people need to stop thinking about how many claps their remake gets instead of if it actually adds anything new to the table πŸ™„. I'm so over these 'classic horror remakes' trying to pass off as original works just because they're familiar with some old stuff πŸŽƒ. What's next? Remaking the entirety of Star Wars in a different language just for the sake of having something fresh-looking on Netflix? Give me a break... The only reason these films are getting attention is because they have the names attached to them, not because they're actually good or innovative πŸ’β€β™€οΈ. And don't even get me started on the 'celebrating individuality' thing... that's just code for "we'll let the people who make these remakes think they're original as long as we don't have to say anything negative about them πŸ˜’".
 
I'm not sold on this resurgence of classic horror remakes πŸ€”. While "Nosferatu" and "Frankenstein" were indeed masterpieces in their own right, I think the point being made here oversimplifies the complex issues surrounding the film industry. What about the fact that both Eggers and del Toro have had successful careers in making original content? Is it really fair to say that these remakes are proof of a new approach to filmmaking?

And what about the cultural context in which these films were released? "Nosferatu" was released during World War I, for example - its themes of repression and trauma were deeply rooted in the zeitgeist. Are we really comparing apples to oranges by saying that these remakes are somehow more "artistic" or "inspired"?

I'd love to see some actual data on box office performance vs. critical acclaim to support this claim πŸ“Š. Just because a remake does well critically doesn't mean it's not just a commercial success rather than an artistic achievement.
 
πŸŽ₯ I think its wild how ppl always wanna compare classic remakes πŸ€”, like they need proof which one is better πŸ˜…. Can't we just appreciate the unique vibes each film brings? "Nosferatu" & "Frankenstein" r like two different beasts (pun intended) πŸΊπŸ’€, each with their own special sauce. What's important is that they're making a statement about our collective psyche, not which one is more profitable πŸ’Έ. I'm hyped to see what Maggie Gyllenhaal and Eggers bring to the table next - hopefully it'll keep the creative momentum going πŸŽ‰!
 
the whole remake thing is so done, like, can't they just leave old classics alone 🀣? i mean, what's next, remaking lord of the rings or something? no one needs to see robert eggers' take on classic horror again. and don't even get me started on how these remakes are getting all this hype just because they're "artistic" now. newsflash: art isn't just about throwing some old story into a new package, it's about bringing something new to the table πŸ€”. if you wanna make a remake, put your own spin on it, don't just rehash the same old stuff πŸ˜’.
 
Back
Top