Google and Amazon's Cloud Computing Contracts Allege 'Winking Mechanism' to Sidestep Legal Orders
A report published by The Guardian reveals that both Google and Amazon have entered into cloud computing contracts with Israel, which reportedly require them to bypass legal orders in the country. The "winking mechanism" stipulation, introduced as part of Project Nimbus in 2021, demands that the US companies send coded messages to Israel whenever they comply with an overseas request for Israeli data.
The coding system involves using country dialing prefixes to indicate which country issued the request. For instance, if Google or Amazon hand over Israeli data to the US, they would be required to send Israel 1,000 shekels. Similarly, complying with a request from Italy would result in sending 3,900 shekels.
A failsafe mechanism has also been reportedly included – if a gag order prevents the companies from using the standard signal, they can notify Israel by sending 100,000 shekels.
It is claimed that Microsoft lost out on the Nimbus contract after refusing to accept some of Israel's terms.
In response to these allegations, Amazon stated in a statement that it respects its customers' privacy and has a rigorous global process for responding to lawful requests related to customer data. However, when asked about underhanded workarounds, an Amazon spokesperson denied any wrongdoing and emphasized the company's commitment to maintaining confidentiality according to applicable laws.
Google also denied any involvement in illegal activity, stating that the accusations are "false" and imply such a scenario is absurd. The Google spokesperson maintained that nothing has changed regarding the Nimbus contract and its terms of service and acceptable use policy.
A statement from an Israeli government source was not received when contacted by this journalist.
				
			A report published by The Guardian reveals that both Google and Amazon have entered into cloud computing contracts with Israel, which reportedly require them to bypass legal orders in the country. The "winking mechanism" stipulation, introduced as part of Project Nimbus in 2021, demands that the US companies send coded messages to Israel whenever they comply with an overseas request for Israeli data.
The coding system involves using country dialing prefixes to indicate which country issued the request. For instance, if Google or Amazon hand over Israeli data to the US, they would be required to send Israel 1,000 shekels. Similarly, complying with a request from Italy would result in sending 3,900 shekels.
A failsafe mechanism has also been reportedly included – if a gag order prevents the companies from using the standard signal, they can notify Israel by sending 100,000 shekels.
It is claimed that Microsoft lost out on the Nimbus contract after refusing to accept some of Israel's terms.
In response to these allegations, Amazon stated in a statement that it respects its customers' privacy and has a rigorous global process for responding to lawful requests related to customer data. However, when asked about underhanded workarounds, an Amazon spokesperson denied any wrongdoing and emphasized the company's commitment to maintaining confidentiality according to applicable laws.
Google also denied any involvement in illegal activity, stating that the accusations are "false" and imply such a scenario is absurd. The Google spokesperson maintained that nothing has changed regarding the Nimbus contract and its terms of service and acceptable use policy.
A statement from an Israeli government source was not received when contacted by this journalist.
 . It sounds like Google and Amazon are basically winking at Israel whenever they comply with a request to hand over data, which is totally not cool
. It sounds like Google and Amazon are basically winking at Israel whenever they comply with a request to hand over data, which is totally not cool  . I mean, who needs a failsafe mechanism that sends 100k shekels just in case? That's some shady stuff right there
. I mean, who needs a failsafe mechanism that sends 100k shekels just in case? That's some shady stuff right there  .
. . It's one thing to respect customers' privacy, but it's another thing entirely to skirt around laws and regulations like this
. It's one thing to respect customers' privacy, but it's another thing entirely to skirt around laws and regulations like this  .
. . We need more transparency here, especially when it comes to international data sharing
. We need more transparency here, especially when it comes to international data sharing  .
.
 I get it, data protection is important, but sometimes you gotta take the money and run, right?
 I get it, data protection is important, but sometimes you gotta take the money and run, right?  they're basically sneaking around international laws to comply with israel's requests it sounds super suspicious like they're hiding something behind some fancy coding system
 they're basically sneaking around international laws to comply with israel's requests it sounds super suspicious like they're hiding something behind some fancy coding system 
 but we know the truth - data is power, and these companies will do whatever it takes to stay on top
 but we know the truth - data is power, and these companies will do whatever it takes to stay on top 
 .
. . And what's up with all those shekels? 100,000? That's a lot of money
. And what's up with all those shekels? 100,000? That's a lot of money  .
. . And what's up with the failsafe mechanism? Sending 100,000 shekels if you can't follow the rules? Sounds like a recipe for disaster
. And what's up with the failsafe mechanism? Sending 100,000 shekels if you can't follow the rules? Sounds like a recipe for disaster  .
. .
. . This whole thing stinks of some shady dealings going on behind closed doors.
. This whole thing stinks of some shady dealings going on behind closed doors. . If Amazon and Google are really committed to maintaining customer privacy, they shouldn't be worried about being transparent about their contracts with Israel
. If Amazon and Google are really committed to maintaining customer privacy, they shouldn't be worried about being transparent about their contracts with Israel  And it's not like the code is super hard to figure out either
 And it's not like the code is super hard to figure out either  i swear, microsoft would've been in a better spot if they took the deal...anyway, i'm lowkey concerned about our online security rn
 i swear, microsoft would've been in a better spot if they took the deal...anyway, i'm lowkey concerned about our online security rn 

 . It's like they're trying to circumvent the law and side-step accountability
. It's like they're trying to circumvent the law and side-step accountability  . The idea of these "coded messages" and "failsafe mechanisms" is just plain creepy
. The idea of these "coded messages" and "failsafe mechanisms" is just plain creepy  . It's like they're trying to create a secret language that only Israel can decipher
. It's like they're trying to create a secret language that only Israel can decipher  .
. , and I hope there are some government reps who'll take a closer look
, and I hope there are some government reps who'll take a closer look  . This whole thing feels like it goes way beyond just Google and Amazon - it's about the larger implications of our tech giants' relationships with governments around the world
. This whole thing feels like it goes way beyond just Google and Amazon - it's about the larger implications of our tech giants' relationships with governments around the world  It seems like Google and Amazon are more interested in playing by their own rules than respecting the laws of other countries. But on a bigger level, isn't that just a reflection of how we value our relationships with others? Do we put more stock in making deals and getting what we want, or do we prioritize doing what's right, even if it's hard?
 It seems like Google and Amazon are more interested in playing by their own rules than respecting the laws of other countries. But on a bigger level, isn't that just a reflection of how we value our relationships with others? Do we put more stock in making deals and getting what we want, or do we prioritize doing what's right, even if it's hard?  The "winking mechanism" might seem like a clever way to sidestep rules, but at the end of the day, it's just a fancy word for "we're not gonna play by the book".
 The "winking mechanism" might seem like a clever way to sidestep rules, but at the end of the day, it's just a fancy word for "we're not gonna play by the book".  . it's always interesting to see how these big corps try to skirt around what's right and wrong
. it's always interesting to see how these big corps try to skirt around what's right and wrong  .
. .
. .
.
 and now these companies are just along for the ride... or so it seems
 and now these companies are just along for the ride... or so it seems  .
. and now ppl are all like "wait a minute, this isnt right!"
 and now ppl are all like "wait a minute, this isnt right!"