A Republican gubernatorial candidate in Michigan is facing backlash for his divisive rhetoric and misinformation about Dearborn, a predominantly Muslim suburb of Detroit. The candidate, Anthony Hudson, has been accused of spreading anti-Muslim hate and stoking fears among the community ahead of a planned march, dubbed the "American Crusade."
Hudson's social media posts have portrayed Dearborn as a threat, falsely suggesting that the city is facing "Muslim infiltration" and "Sharia law." He has repeatedly invoked Christian nationalist language and vowed to "expose Dearborn for what it is," claiming that the city is under the control of Islamic leaders.
Despite lacking any concrete evidence, Hudson's claims have sparked outrage among civil rights advocates, who warn that his rhetoric can incite harassment and deepen divisions. Dawud Walid, executive director of the Michigan chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), has condemned Hudson's remarks, saying they are "playing the politics of fear" to gain publicity.
The planned march is seen as a desperate attempt by Hudson to drum up support among his base. However, it remains unclear whether his divisive rhetoric will resonate with voters. Hudson faces a crowded field of Republican candidates, including well-known figures such as former Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox and U.S. Rep. John James.
Hudson's platform includes cutting funding for essential services such as schools, police, healthcare, parks, libraries, and infrastructure. He has vowed to eliminate both the state income tax and property taxes, a proposal that economists say would devastate Michigan's ability to fund these services.
The Michigan legislature's budget is heavily reliant on property taxes, which generate around $18.8 billion annually, and the state income tax, which brings in about $9 billion per year. Eliminating either of these taxes would create a massive funding gap, crippling local governments and public services.
As the election approaches, Hudson's opponents are likely to highlight his divisive rhetoric and policies as a threat to the state's values and communities.
Hudson's social media posts have portrayed Dearborn as a threat, falsely suggesting that the city is facing "Muslim infiltration" and "Sharia law." He has repeatedly invoked Christian nationalist language and vowed to "expose Dearborn for what it is," claiming that the city is under the control of Islamic leaders.
Despite lacking any concrete evidence, Hudson's claims have sparked outrage among civil rights advocates, who warn that his rhetoric can incite harassment and deepen divisions. Dawud Walid, executive director of the Michigan chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), has condemned Hudson's remarks, saying they are "playing the politics of fear" to gain publicity.
The planned march is seen as a desperate attempt by Hudson to drum up support among his base. However, it remains unclear whether his divisive rhetoric will resonate with voters. Hudson faces a crowded field of Republican candidates, including well-known figures such as former Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox and U.S. Rep. John James.
Hudson's platform includes cutting funding for essential services such as schools, police, healthcare, parks, libraries, and infrastructure. He has vowed to eliminate both the state income tax and property taxes, a proposal that economists say would devastate Michigan's ability to fund these services.
The Michigan legislature's budget is heavily reliant on property taxes, which generate around $18.8 billion annually, and the state income tax, which brings in about $9 billion per year. Eliminating either of these taxes would create a massive funding gap, crippling local governments and public services.
As the election approaches, Hudson's opponents are likely to highlight his divisive rhetoric and policies as a threat to the state's values and communities.