Texas Governor Greg Abbott's office has released nearly 1,400 pages of emails exchanged with Elon Musk and his companies, but the records reveal little about their relationship or Musk's influence over state government. In fact, all but about 200 of the pages are entirely blacked out.
The documents were made public in response to a public records request by The Texas Newsroom, which asked for communications with Musk and his employees dating back to last fall. Abbott's office initially fought their release, arguing that some emails contained confidential information or were "intimate and embarrassing."
However, after the state Supreme Court intervened, the governor's office released the records in August. But instead of revealing any meaningful insights into Musk's influence over Texas government, most of the pages are heavily redacted.
Some examples of the documents include old incorporation records for SpaceX, emails regarding a state grant awarded to the company, and an invitation to a happy hour with Musk. Others include reminders about upcoming SpaceX launches and an application from a then-Musk employee to sit on a state commission.
Experts say that the limited disclosure is emblematic of a larger transparency problem in Texas. A 2015 state Supreme Court decision made it easier for companies to argue that records should be withheld, allowing them to claim "competitively sensitive" information as an exemption.
Open government experts say that this has led to a culture of secrecy and made it harder for citizens to access records documenting interactions between governments and private companies. They point to the example of McAllen, Texas, which refused to disclose how much money was spent to lure pop star Enrique Iglesias to the city for a concert.
The problem has been exacerbated by the fact that the Office of the Attorney General does not have the power to investigate whether records are actually confidential. Instead, companies can assert that information is confidential and governmental bodies may choose not to second-guess their claims.
As part of an effort to track Musk's influence in Texas, The Texas Newsroom requested communications with employees from four of his companies: SpaceX, Tesla, X, and Neuralink. Abbott's office initially refused to release the records, citing concerns about trade secrets and confidential information. But after a public outcry, they finally released 1,374 pages of documents, most of which were redacted.
Experts say that this is just one example of how weak public records laws can lead to secrecy and undermine transparency in government. "The fact that a governmental body can redact more than 1,000 pages of documents that are directly related to a major business's activities in Texas is certainly problematic," said attorney Reid Pillifant.
It remains to be seen whether The Texas Newsroom will succeed in its appeal to order the release of the Musk emails. But one thing is clear: this case highlights the ongoing struggle for transparency and accountability in government, particularly when it comes to private companies with significant influence over public policy.
The documents were made public in response to a public records request by The Texas Newsroom, which asked for communications with Musk and his employees dating back to last fall. Abbott's office initially fought their release, arguing that some emails contained confidential information or were "intimate and embarrassing."
However, after the state Supreme Court intervened, the governor's office released the records in August. But instead of revealing any meaningful insights into Musk's influence over Texas government, most of the pages are heavily redacted.
Some examples of the documents include old incorporation records for SpaceX, emails regarding a state grant awarded to the company, and an invitation to a happy hour with Musk. Others include reminders about upcoming SpaceX launches and an application from a then-Musk employee to sit on a state commission.
Experts say that the limited disclosure is emblematic of a larger transparency problem in Texas. A 2015 state Supreme Court decision made it easier for companies to argue that records should be withheld, allowing them to claim "competitively sensitive" information as an exemption.
Open government experts say that this has led to a culture of secrecy and made it harder for citizens to access records documenting interactions between governments and private companies. They point to the example of McAllen, Texas, which refused to disclose how much money was spent to lure pop star Enrique Iglesias to the city for a concert.
The problem has been exacerbated by the fact that the Office of the Attorney General does not have the power to investigate whether records are actually confidential. Instead, companies can assert that information is confidential and governmental bodies may choose not to second-guess their claims.
As part of an effort to track Musk's influence in Texas, The Texas Newsroom requested communications with employees from four of his companies: SpaceX, Tesla, X, and Neuralink. Abbott's office initially refused to release the records, citing concerns about trade secrets and confidential information. But after a public outcry, they finally released 1,374 pages of documents, most of which were redacted.
Experts say that this is just one example of how weak public records laws can lead to secrecy and undermine transparency in government. "The fact that a governmental body can redact more than 1,000 pages of documents that are directly related to a major business's activities in Texas is certainly problematic," said attorney Reid Pillifant.
It remains to be seen whether The Texas Newsroom will succeed in its appeal to order the release of the Musk emails. But one thing is clear: this case highlights the ongoing struggle for transparency and accountability in government, particularly when it comes to private companies with significant influence over public policy.
. I mean, you'd think that if there's a connection between the state government and a major company like SpaceX, we'd know more about it by now. But seriously, most of those 1,400 pages are blacked out? That's just weird.
. If someone asks for public records, shouldn't that mean the info is available to everyone? It seems like a huge oversight on the part of the government. I'm not surprised, though - we've had issues with transparency in Texas before 
.
. It's like they're hiding something from us and saying it's for the greater good. And what even is the Office of the Attorney General supposed to do? Investigate if records are actually confidential? That sounds like a pretty big responsibility, but I guess we'll never know for sure.
. We need more transparency and accountability in government, especially when it comes to private companies with so much influence over public policy 
.
that's just crazy talk! it's like they think we won't notice if they redact the whole thing 
I mean, I'm all for innovation and progress but come on, shouldn't we know what's going on behind closed doors? 
. But nope, most of it is just blacked out 
. It's like they're trying to hide something. And let's be real, this whole thing just screams transparency problem 
in Texas. Companies can claim "competitively sensitive" info and just get away with it 
.
. It's like, what's the point of having a public records law if you're just gonna hide all the juicy stuff behind a bunch of red tape? 
. It's like Abbott's office is more worried about keeping their buddies at SpaceX happy than serving the people of Texas. 
And don't even get me started on this whole "trade secrets" thing - what exactly are we hiding? 
.
. We deserve better than to be kept in the dark by those in power 
.
. Maybe The Texas Newsroom will be able to shed some light on this, but until then, I'm left with a lot of unanswered questions 
It does seem weird that Abbott's office was so hesitant to share the records in the first place, though. I guess it's a good thing The Texas Newsroom kept pushing for it.
It seems like there are too many loopholes and exemptions that let companies like SpaceX get away with keeping their dealings with the state under wraps. And yeah, I can see how that would be problematic.
. And don't even get me started on the excuses - "confidential info", "intimate and embarrassing"... gimme a break 
". And then you got experts coming out of the woodwork saying, "Hey, this is a problem!" Yeah, no kidding, it's a huge problem 
.
. Whatever it is, we deserve to know, right? So let's hope The Texas Newsroom keeps pushing for transparency and accountability from our government officials 
this whole situation is super frustrating. how can you even trust that certain info isn't being hidden from u? 1k+ pages redacted lol what's the point of having open records laws if they're just gonna get ignored? and it's not like it's just about tx but also nationwide we need to see more accountability from these big corporations 
️. The fact that only 200 pages were left unredacted is super weird 
Is it just a coincidence that the state Supreme Court intervened and made them release the records? 
. like, they release 1400 pages but most of dem is redacted lol what's da point? it's like dey tryna hide somethin'. I think it's crazy dat companies can just claim info is confidential and gov bodies don't bother checkin' it out 
.
or a process for the public to see? 
but seriously, how do we know what's actually confidential and what's just being used to hide something? 
. The heavy redaction of nearly 1,200 pages is a clear indication that the governor's office has something to hide 
.
. But seriously, this is a big deal for transparency in government. It's like, how can we trust our leaders if we don't know what's going on behind closed doors?