US President Donald Trump's plan to take control of Venezuela's vast oil reserves has raised eyebrows among experts, who warn that the move may not yield the expected returns and could even sink into a financial quagmire.
The Trump administration is attempting to seize $3 billion worth of crude oil stuck in tankers and storage facilities, claiming it will be "turned over" to the US before being sold on the international market. However, the administration's ambitions go far beyond that initial move, with plans to control all of Venezuela's oil sales indefinitely.
Experts say, however, that the road ahead is fraught with challenges. The country's aging oil infrastructure requires a whopping $183 billion to be restored to its former output levels, with some estimates suggesting it could take until 2040 to achieve. The process also involves significant investment in extracting the country's dense and expensive-to-produce heavy crude.
"The total spending required to return Venezuela's output to 2m barrels a day could hit highs of $183bn," noted analysts at global consultancy Rystad Energy. "In order to make this scenario a possibility, at least 25% of this amount – $30bn-$35bn – would have to be committed in the first two years."
Furthermore, US oil companies are wary about investing in Venezuela due to its tumultuous politics and perceived lack of stability under President Trump's rule. "No one wants to go in there when a random fucking tweet can change the entire foreign policy of the country," one private equity energy investor told the Financial Times.
In fact, even if production is somehow revived, it may not be enough to offset the growing supply glut and declining demand for oil. Climate action could usher in a permanent reduction in global demand, with renewables becoming increasingly viable alternatives to fossil fuels.
As such, the move by Trump's administration may end up being more of a scramble for stranded assets than a smart investment strategy. Economists warn that investing in Venezuela at this juncture would be akin to trying to hold water in one's hands – it's only a matter of time before the returns become unsustainable.
The Trump administration is attempting to seize $3 billion worth of crude oil stuck in tankers and storage facilities, claiming it will be "turned over" to the US before being sold on the international market. However, the administration's ambitions go far beyond that initial move, with plans to control all of Venezuela's oil sales indefinitely.
Experts say, however, that the road ahead is fraught with challenges. The country's aging oil infrastructure requires a whopping $183 billion to be restored to its former output levels, with some estimates suggesting it could take until 2040 to achieve. The process also involves significant investment in extracting the country's dense and expensive-to-produce heavy crude.
"The total spending required to return Venezuela's output to 2m barrels a day could hit highs of $183bn," noted analysts at global consultancy Rystad Energy. "In order to make this scenario a possibility, at least 25% of this amount – $30bn-$35bn – would have to be committed in the first two years."
Furthermore, US oil companies are wary about investing in Venezuela due to its tumultuous politics and perceived lack of stability under President Trump's rule. "No one wants to go in there when a random fucking tweet can change the entire foreign policy of the country," one private equity energy investor told the Financial Times.
In fact, even if production is somehow revived, it may not be enough to offset the growing supply glut and declining demand for oil. Climate action could usher in a permanent reduction in global demand, with renewables becoming increasingly viable alternatives to fossil fuels.
As such, the move by Trump's administration may end up being more of a scramble for stranded assets than a smart investment strategy. Economists warn that investing in Venezuela at this juncture would be akin to trying to hold water in one's hands – it's only a matter of time before the returns become unsustainable.