The landscape of US military efforts has undergone a significant shift in recent years, with AI companies like Meta, Google, and OpenAI becoming increasingly involved. Just two years ago, these companies were united against the use of their tools for military purposes. However, over the past year, this stance has changed dramatically.
In January 2024, OpenAI quietly rescinded its ban on using AI for "military and warfare" purposes, with reports emerging that it was working on several projects with the Pentagon. Meta followed suit in November, announcing that the US and select allies could use its Llama AI for defense purposes. Anthropic also allowed its models to be used by the military, partnering with defense firm Palantir. OpenAI later announced a partnership with defense startup Anduril.
Meanwhile, Google revised its AI principles to allow for the development and use of weapons and technologies that might harm people. The rapid shift in stance has raised concerns about the existential risks of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence). Worryingly, worries about these risks have virtually disappeared.
The change can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, the immense costs involved in building these models have made research on general-purpose technologies faster and more efficient. The defense sector's soft budget constraints and long-term nature of contracts make it an attractive customer for new technologies.
Secondly, the geopolitical landscape has changed significantly since the mid-2010s, with the emergence of a new fraction of Silicon Valley capital and a splitting of worldviews amongst the American tech elite. A growing influence of a newly prominent tech right has also emerged, which includes radical ideologies such as libertarian network state utopias, techno-monarchist visions, and eugenicist views.
The national security interests in favor of stymying China have been let loose in recent years. The US has deployed tools such as tariffs, investment screening, export controls, and more to resist Chinese competition. Major AI startups like Sam Altman have also begun pushing the narrative of a zero-sum struggle between the US and China.
The hyperscaler AI firms and semiconductor companies have largely refrained from stoking geopolitical tensions, advocating instead for a world built around the free flow of goods, services, and data. However, the vaguely socially liberal elements of Silicon Valley are being attacked and replaced with an increasingly virulent right-wing stance that aligns with the state via government contracts and a bipolar vision of the global order.
This reflects a major breakdown of the Silicon Valley Consensus, characterized by competing hegemonic visions between neoliberal globalization on one hand and Manichean visions of the global order on the other. The future is far from settled as alternatives are desperately needed to navigate this complex landscape.
In January 2024, OpenAI quietly rescinded its ban on using AI for "military and warfare" purposes, with reports emerging that it was working on several projects with the Pentagon. Meta followed suit in November, announcing that the US and select allies could use its Llama AI for defense purposes. Anthropic also allowed its models to be used by the military, partnering with defense firm Palantir. OpenAI later announced a partnership with defense startup Anduril.
Meanwhile, Google revised its AI principles to allow for the development and use of weapons and technologies that might harm people. The rapid shift in stance has raised concerns about the existential risks of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence). Worryingly, worries about these risks have virtually disappeared.
The change can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, the immense costs involved in building these models have made research on general-purpose technologies faster and more efficient. The defense sector's soft budget constraints and long-term nature of contracts make it an attractive customer for new technologies.
Secondly, the geopolitical landscape has changed significantly since the mid-2010s, with the emergence of a new fraction of Silicon Valley capital and a splitting of worldviews amongst the American tech elite. A growing influence of a newly prominent tech right has also emerged, which includes radical ideologies such as libertarian network state utopias, techno-monarchist visions, and eugenicist views.
The national security interests in favor of stymying China have been let loose in recent years. The US has deployed tools such as tariffs, investment screening, export controls, and more to resist Chinese competition. Major AI startups like Sam Altman have also begun pushing the narrative of a zero-sum struggle between the US and China.
The hyperscaler AI firms and semiconductor companies have largely refrained from stoking geopolitical tensions, advocating instead for a world built around the free flow of goods, services, and data. However, the vaguely socially liberal elements of Silicon Valley are being attacked and replaced with an increasingly virulent right-wing stance that aligns with the state via government contracts and a bipolar vision of the global order.
This reflects a major breakdown of the Silicon Valley Consensus, characterized by competing hegemonic visions between neoliberal globalization on one hand and Manichean visions of the global order on the other. The future is far from settled as alternatives are desperately needed to navigate this complex landscape.