AI-driven layoffs, yeah... I'm sure HP's just trying to save a buck, who isn't, right?
They're not really concerned about the impact on employees, they're just looking for ways to cut costs and boost profits. And honestly, it's easy to see how AI could be used as a scapegoat for layoffs - companies love blaming technology for their own short-sighted decisions.
I mean, think about it, if you lay off 4,000-6,000 people and then claim that AI is the reason why, people are gonna believe you. It's like "oh, we had to automate all those jobs because of AI" when really, it was just a cost-cutting measure.
And what about the experts who say there's limited evidence for widespread AI-driven layoffs? Yeah, sure, but companies don't need proof - they just need a reason to cut costs. And if that means pinning it on AI, then so be it. It's not like we haven't seen this before...
I mean, think about it, if you lay off 4,000-6,000 people and then claim that AI is the reason why, people are gonna believe you. It's like "oh, we had to automate all those jobs because of AI" when really, it was just a cost-cutting measure.
And what about the experts who say there's limited evidence for widespread AI-driven layoffs? Yeah, sure, but companies don't need proof - they just need a reason to cut costs. And if that means pinning it on AI, then so be it. It's not like we haven't seen this before...