Tyre pollution linked to mass salmon deaths amid US court battle.
A California district judge is currently presiding over a three-day trial brought by west coast fishermen and conservationists against major tyre companies, alleging that a chemical additive used in tyres is poisoning rivers and waterways. The alleged culprit? A toxic substance called 6PPD-quinone, or 6PPD-q, which scientists claim is killing coho salmon and other fish.
According to environmental group Earthjustice, the case hinges on whether tyre manufacturers are violating the Endangered Species Act by harming protected fish species. Fishermen claim that their livelihoods depend on the health of these populations, and the court will determine if the tyre companies' actions fall short of legal standards.
At the heart of the case is the mysterious "urban runoff mortality syndrome" which has claimed thousands of salmon in recent years. Scientists from Washington State University initially linked mass deaths to storm runoff, but a 2020 study revealed that toxic tyre leachate was actually the main culprit. The chemical additive, known as 6PPD, is added to tyres to extend their lifespan, and its transformation into 6PPD-q in rivers and creeks has devastating results for vulnerable salmon populations.
The plaintiffs claim that just one car can produce enough of this toxic substance to kill over 11 million salmon. Key testimony from co-author Edward Kolodziej supports this claim, describing how the chemical is rapidly produced when tyres interact with ozone and water. His team also identified a unique "mortality signature" for 6PPD-q in water samples.
However, not all scientists are convinced that tyre pollution is to blame. Tiffany Thomas, a defence witness from consultancy firm Exponent, questioned the findings presented by the plaintiffs' scientists, arguing that laboratory studies were not representative of real-world conditions and were "limited and speculative". She also highlighted the chemical's rapid degradation in water.
As the trial continues, it remains to be seen whether tyre companies will be held accountable for their environmental impact. The court's decision could have far-reaching implications beyond US borders, highlighting the need for greater regulation and sustainability in industries such as manufacturing and transportation.
A California district judge is currently presiding over a three-day trial brought by west coast fishermen and conservationists against major tyre companies, alleging that a chemical additive used in tyres is poisoning rivers and waterways. The alleged culprit? A toxic substance called 6PPD-quinone, or 6PPD-q, which scientists claim is killing coho salmon and other fish.
According to environmental group Earthjustice, the case hinges on whether tyre manufacturers are violating the Endangered Species Act by harming protected fish species. Fishermen claim that their livelihoods depend on the health of these populations, and the court will determine if the tyre companies' actions fall short of legal standards.
At the heart of the case is the mysterious "urban runoff mortality syndrome" which has claimed thousands of salmon in recent years. Scientists from Washington State University initially linked mass deaths to storm runoff, but a 2020 study revealed that toxic tyre leachate was actually the main culprit. The chemical additive, known as 6PPD, is added to tyres to extend their lifespan, and its transformation into 6PPD-q in rivers and creeks has devastating results for vulnerable salmon populations.
The plaintiffs claim that just one car can produce enough of this toxic substance to kill over 11 million salmon. Key testimony from co-author Edward Kolodziej supports this claim, describing how the chemical is rapidly produced when tyres interact with ozone and water. His team also identified a unique "mortality signature" for 6PPD-q in water samples.
However, not all scientists are convinced that tyre pollution is to blame. Tiffany Thomas, a defence witness from consultancy firm Exponent, questioned the findings presented by the plaintiffs' scientists, arguing that laboratory studies were not representative of real-world conditions and were "limited and speculative". She also highlighted the chemical's rapid degradation in water.
As the trial continues, it remains to be seen whether tyre companies will be held accountable for their environmental impact. The court's decision could have far-reaching implications beyond US borders, highlighting the need for greater regulation and sustainability in industries such as manufacturing and transportation.