A US District Court judge in Manhattan has temporarily halted the Trump administration's plan to freeze billions of dollars in child care and anti-poverty funding to New York and four other Democratic-led states. The order, which will remain in effect for up to 14 days unless extended, instructs federal officials to lift restrictions on funds allocated through three major programs: the Child Care and Development Fund, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and the Social Services Block Grant.
The decision was made by Judge Arun Subramanian following a hearing last Friday, after New York and four other states sued the Trump administration over its move to freeze $10 billion in federal funding. The states had argued that the cuts could quickly disrupt vital services for hundreds of thousands of families, while the administration claimed the freeze was necessary to investigate potential fraud.
However, the judge ruled that the states had shown sufficient cause to halt the funding freeze pending further litigation, taking into account that the administration offered no evidence to justify its actions and had unlawfully singled out these four states. The order does not address the underlying investigation, but rather requires federal officials to restore access to funds until the case is resolved.
The impact of this decision could be significant for New York families, who rely on annual funding of approximately $3.1 billion through these three programs.
The decision was made by Judge Arun Subramanian following a hearing last Friday, after New York and four other states sued the Trump administration over its move to freeze $10 billion in federal funding. The states had argued that the cuts could quickly disrupt vital services for hundreds of thousands of families, while the administration claimed the freeze was necessary to investigate potential fraud.
However, the judge ruled that the states had shown sufficient cause to halt the funding freeze pending further litigation, taking into account that the administration offered no evidence to justify its actions and had unlawfully singled out these four states. The order does not address the underlying investigation, but rather requires federal officials to restore access to funds until the case is resolved.
The impact of this decision could be significant for New York families, who rely on annual funding of approximately $3.1 billion through these three programs.
. I know some people are going to say that Trump's administration was trying to cut unnecessary spending, but come on... $10 billion is a lot of money 
. And those states didn't exactly deserve it either 
. But at the same time, you gotta admire New York for standing up for what they think is right 
. I mean, if they're willing to take on the feds over something like this, that says a lot about their determination and commitment to their constituents 
. And let's be real, it's not like the funding was going to magically appear out of thin air 
. So yeah, I think Judge Subramanian made a solid call here 
.
. I mean, can you imagine what this means for families in New York who rely on those funds? It's huge! The fact that the administration didn't even have any evidence to back up their claims just doesn't add up 
.
. It's a win for our system of governance, and I'm glad some folks are pushing back against what feels like a power grab 
. But seriously, this is huge for New York families who are counting on those programs to get by. It's not just about the money, though – it's about the people and the services that rely on it 
. The fact that the admin was all secretive about their 'investigation' without doing any actual proof makes me suspicious 
. Now, let's keep an eye on this case and hope it gets resolved soon 
.
it's crazy how they were trying to pull this stunt without even having proof 
so yeah, this is def a win for all those families who are counting on this funding 
.
.
, especially for families who already struggle to make ends meet. I mean, have they not seen the headlines about homelessness and food insecurity? It's time to get real and support our most vulnerable citizens, not hold them hostage over some dodgy investigation that seems like a total witch hunt 
.
. Fingers crossed the case gets resolved soon and those funds start flowing again 
. It's like, when we stand up for what's right, even if it means standing alone for a bit 
, it can lead to big changes and a more just system in the long run 
.
. I mean, freezing billions of dollars in funding to states that really need it? That sounds like a recipe for disaster, especially with families depending on those services. The fact that the administration didn't even have any solid evidence to back up their claims is wild 
. This could be a big deal for New York families, especially since they rely so heavily on those funding programs 
I guess the states said it would mess with thousands of families' lives if they did it. But the admin was all like "we gotta investigate some possible fraud" 
without even showing any proof, you know? And now the judge is like "nah, you can't just do that" and gave them an extension to sort out their nonsense... but only for 14 days so yeah, it's still a pretty big deal. 
I mean what if they really are investigating something shady? But at least these states got some breathing room. And btw $3.1 billion is like a lot of money! 
! like seriously can you even imagine what would've happened if they were able to freeze all that funding? it's already hard enough for families who are struggling to make ends meet, let alone when you're talking about hundreds of thousands of people 
. and the fact that the admin had no evidence to back up their claims is just another example of how out of touch they've been with reality 
. now let's see what happens next and hope that justice gets served 