Federal Judges Order Trump Administration to Tap into Emergency Funds for SNAP Food Stamp Benefits During Shutdown
A pair of federal judges has ruled that the Trump administration must continue paying Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) food stamp benefits during the ongoing government shutdown, forcing the administration to tap into contingency funds to avoid a lapse in benefits.
The decision comes after two dozen states and the District of Columbia sued the administration over its decision to cut off payments due to the shutdown. The states argued that the move was unlawful and would deprive millions of Americans of essential food assistance, which is crucial for protecting against food insecurity and hunger.
In Massachusetts, Judge Indira Talwani ruled that the government must use the emergency contingency funds to make at least partial payments to the states administering SNAP programs. She gave the administration until Monday to report back on its plans to do so.
Similarly, in Rhode Island, another federal judge granted a temporary restraining order, ordering the US Department of Agriculture to distribute contingency funds and report back to the court by noon on Monday.
The ruling rejected the government's argument that the $5 billion contingency fund could not be used to cover the shortfall. Instead, Judge Talwani wrote that the administration is statutorily mandated to use the contingency reserve when necessary and has discretion to use other previously appropriated funds.
SNAP benefits provide eligible families with an average of $187 a month on a prepaid card for food purchases, which many rely on as their main source of money for food. The Trump administration said payments were due to expire on Saturday because of the shutdown, now on its 31st day.
President Trump has vowed to provide funding for SNAP benefits if given the legal direction by the court. In a statement, he blamed Democrats for causing any delay and claimed it would be his honor to fund the benefits, just like he did with military and law enforcement pay.
The decision from the judges comes amid concerns over public health and well-being, as state officials argued that shutting off SNAP benefits would lead to food insecurity, hunger, and malnutrition, associated with numerous negative health outcomes.
A pair of federal judges has ruled that the Trump administration must continue paying Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) food stamp benefits during the ongoing government shutdown, forcing the administration to tap into contingency funds to avoid a lapse in benefits.
The decision comes after two dozen states and the District of Columbia sued the administration over its decision to cut off payments due to the shutdown. The states argued that the move was unlawful and would deprive millions of Americans of essential food assistance, which is crucial for protecting against food insecurity and hunger.
In Massachusetts, Judge Indira Talwani ruled that the government must use the emergency contingency funds to make at least partial payments to the states administering SNAP programs. She gave the administration until Monday to report back on its plans to do so.
Similarly, in Rhode Island, another federal judge granted a temporary restraining order, ordering the US Department of Agriculture to distribute contingency funds and report back to the court by noon on Monday.
The ruling rejected the government's argument that the $5 billion contingency fund could not be used to cover the shortfall. Instead, Judge Talwani wrote that the administration is statutorily mandated to use the contingency reserve when necessary and has discretion to use other previously appropriated funds.
SNAP benefits provide eligible families with an average of $187 a month on a prepaid card for food purchases, which many rely on as their main source of money for food. The Trump administration said payments were due to expire on Saturday because of the shutdown, now on its 31st day.
President Trump has vowed to provide funding for SNAP benefits if given the legal direction by the court. In a statement, he blamed Democrats for causing any delay and claimed it would be his honor to fund the benefits, just like he did with military and law enforcement pay.
The decision from the judges comes amid concerns over public health and well-being, as state officials argued that shutting off SNAP benefits would lead to food insecurity, hunger, and malnutrition, associated with numerous negative health outcomes.