Lawmakers see video of second strike on boat survivors, say admiral testified there was no kill order

US Military Officials Show Lawmakers Video of Second Strike on Boat Survivors, Deny Kill Order

In a closed-door briefing on Capitol Hill, military officials showed lawmakers a video of the second strike on an alleged Venezuelan drug boat that has sparked controversy and raised questions about the legality of the operation. The strike, which occurred on September 2, resulted in the deaths of two survivors who were attempting to climb back onto the boat after it was initially struck.

The military officials testified that there was no order from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to kill everyone on board, contradicting a report by the Washington Post that quoted an anonymous source as saying that Hegseth had verbally ordered the strike. However, Navy Adm. Frank "Mitch" Bradley, head of Special Operations Command, told lawmakers that he had not been ordered to leave no survivors.

The video of the second attack, which has not been made public until now, was shown to lawmakers during the briefing. Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT) described what he saw as "one of the most troubling things I've seen in my time in public service." He said that the US military was attacking "shipwrecked sailors," who were "bad guys" but still deserving of humanitarian treatment.

The strike has raised concerns about the legality and morality of the operation, with some lawmakers accusing it of being a war crime. The administration has argued that the strikes are lawful because they target drug cartels designated as terrorist organizations, and that US troops are not in harm's way.

Lawmakers from both parties have vowed to investigate the incident further. Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI) called for the Pentagon to release the footage of the second strike, while GOP Rep. Rick Crawford (R-AR) said that he is "deeply concerned" about public statements made by others seeking to politicize the issue.

The incident has sparked a wider debate about the role of the US military in countering terrorism and the need for greater transparency and accountability in the use of force.
 
omg, this video thingy ๐Ÿคฏ is giving me so much anxiety ๐Ÿ’€... can't believe they showed it to lawmakers, like, what's next? ๐Ÿšจ a whole briefing on Capitol Hill about some drone strikes on civilians? ๐ŸŽฅ it's crazy how quickly we forget that we're talking about real people over there, not just numbers or stats.

i draw this ๐Ÿ“ quick diagram of the situation:

+---------------+
| US Military |
| (Special Ops) |
+---------------+
|
|
v
+---------------+ +---------------+
| Venezuela | | International |
| Boat (drug | | Community |
| Cartel) | | Watchdog Group |
+---------------+ +---------------+

|
|
v
? what's the law?
? is this a war crime?
?

i think Rep Jim Himes spoke up for many of us who are like "wait, can we not just talk about the bad guys without harming innocent people?" ๐Ÿค”
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this whole thing, it's just so messed up ๐Ÿ˜•. The fact that the US military is showing us this video of people being attacked after they've already been injured is pretty disturbing. I mean, who do we consider "bad guys" here? These survivors are literally clinging to a sinking boat and trying to survive. They're not even fighting back anymore.

And let's be real, if we're going to call someone a terrorist, they should at least have the decency to go down without a fight, you know? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ It's one thing to target organized crime groups or military personnel, but shipwrecked sailors? That's just not right.

I'm glad some lawmakers are speaking out about this and calling for greater transparency. We need to know what's going on behind the scenes and whether our government is following its own laws and guidelines when it comes to using force. This whole thing feels like a big mess, and we need more accountability before things escalate further ๐Ÿ’ฅ.
 
idk about this 2nd strike thingy, sounds like a whole lotta bs ๐Ÿค” lol what's the diff btw "lawful" & "war crime"? can't we just get a straight answer without all these twists & turns? i mean, if u r attacking some guy who's tryin to swim back onto his boat, isn't that kinda basic human rights 101?
 
idk why we need more proof, like, i get it the gov's trying to cover its ass but can't they just be honest already ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ? this whole thing is just a mess and i'm not sure which side to believe anymore... i mean, if there was no kill order then why are they showing us the vid now? seems like an attempt to discredit the ppl who spoke out against it. but at the same time, i'm glad some lawmakers are standing up for those sailors ๐Ÿšฃโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ’”
 
๐Ÿ˜Š I'm thinking, what's the deal with this video that was just shown to lawmakers? ๐Ÿค” It's like, we know that there were some bad guys on that boat, but come on, attacking people who are trying to escape? That doesn't seem right. And now it's out that no one was given a kill order, so yeah, that raises even more questions about what really went down.

I mean, I get why the military wants to target drug cartels and all, but when you're dealing with people who are literally trying to survive, you gotta have some humanity involved. It's like, we're not talking about a battlefield here, we're talking about people who were just trying to make it back to shore.

And can we talk about how this whole thing is getting politicized? ๐Ÿ™„ Like, I get that there are different opinions on how to handle things, but come on, let's try to have a serious conversation about what happened instead of using it as a way to score points.
 
I'm telling you, this whole thing with the video of that second strike is sketchy ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ‘€. I mean, they're showing us a video of people trying to climb back onto their own boat after it's already been hit, and suddenly we're talking about war crimes? It just doesn't add up, you know?

And what really gets me is that the military officials are saying there was no order to kill everyone on board, but then we've got these reports from people inside the Pentagon saying that Hegseth gave some kind of signal to go after them. I'm not saying Hegseth did anything wrong or whatever, but can't we get a straight answer here? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

The fact that the Navy Adm is saying he wasn't told to leave no survivors and then there's this video showing people getting attacked... it's just weird, man. And what about those sailors who were already on the boat after the first strike? Did they get some special treatment or what? ๐Ÿคฏ It's like we're living in a real-life action movie or something.

I'm not saying I condone whatever happened there, but come on, can't we have a honest conversation about this without all the backpedaling and spin-doctoring? ๐Ÿ’”
 
omg, this is so messed up ๐Ÿคฏ... I don't think it's right that they're attacking people who are just trying to survive, you know? #NotWarCrime, let's try to find out what really happened here ๐Ÿค”... like, why did the US military strike a boat with survivors on board again? Was there even a warrant or something? ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’”... I'm totally on Rep Jim Himes' side on this one, and also Sen Jack Reed's #TransparencyIsKey, it's time for the Pentagon to spill the beans ๐Ÿ’ง...
 
OMG, this is so crazy! ๐Ÿคฏ I'm shocked that they're still denying any kill orders, but like, why would they show the video if they were trying to hide something? ๐Ÿ˜’ It just seems like they're trying to save face and not get roasted online. The part that really gets me is when Rep Jim Himes said those survivors were "bad guys" who deserved humanitarian treatment... like, come on! ๐Ÿ™„ They were on a boat trying to survive, not planning a terrorist attack. This whole thing just smells fishy to me... ๐Ÿ’ฆ
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this whole thing... I mean, what even is going on here? ๐Ÿคฏ They show us this video of these people being attacked after they're already hurt, and now everyone's all like "wait, was there a kill order or not?" ๐Ÿ˜• It just seems so messed up. And then we got the military saying nope, there wasn't one, but some other dude is all like yeah, there was... I don't know, it's all just really confusing.

And can we talk about this for a second? These people were literally trying to climb back onto their sinking boat and save themselves. Like, what even is the definition of "bad guys" here? ๐Ÿค” They're not exactly like enemy soldiers or something... I mean, if that was the case, wouldn't they've had any idea they were in a war zone?

Anyway, it's all just making me super uneasy, you know? We need to get to the bottom of this and make sure our military is following proper procedures. Transparency and accountability are key here! ๐Ÿ’ก
 
I'm thinking, what's up with this strike? ๐Ÿค” I mean, two people dying is not okay, you know? And then they show us a video of the second attack and it's like, super intense... I don't want to see that stuff. The thing is, some lawmakers are saying that there was no order to kill everyone on board which is good, but at the same time, the administration is saying it's all part of the fight against terrorism... yeah, but what about human rights? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ We're not just talking about bad people, we're talking about human beings who deserve some respect. I don't know if I buy that "lawful" thing either, seems like a grey area to me. Anyway, more transparency and accountability is probably a good idea... we need to make sure our military is acting in the right way. ๐Ÿค
 
I'm getting really worried about this situation... ๐Ÿค• Seeing that video of the survivors being attacked again, it's like, what were they even doing at sea? ๐ŸŒŠ You're trying to escape, you're not a threat anymore. I get that they were on a boat with suspected cartel members, but come on, that doesn't give anyone the right to die ๐Ÿ’€

I'm not saying we should just let them live, but it's like... we have to think about this from all angles ๐Ÿค” We need to know more about what happened and why. Was there even a clear order to kill everyone? I don't trust that anonymous source quote from the Post ๐Ÿ“ฐ It sounds fishy to me

I'm hoping lawmakers will dig deeper and not let this get too politicized ๐Ÿ’ช We need more transparency and accountability, especially when it comes to our military operations. They're trained for certain situations, but they shouldn't be making life or death decisions without proper oversight ๐Ÿ‘Š
 
I can only imagine how distressing that must've been to watch ๐Ÿค•. Those survivors were just trying to survive, you know? It's heartbreaking to see them getting attacked again after they'd already been hurt once ๐Ÿ’”. I think it's really messed up that the military didn't have a clear order to leave no survivors, and now we're left wondering what actually happened in those 5 minutes โฐ. We need to make sure that everyone involved is held accountable for their actions, but at the same time, let's not forget that these people are human beings who deserve dignity and respect โค๏ธ.
 
๐Ÿšข๐Ÿ˜ฑ[A graphic with a boat sinking, with a red X marked through it]๐Ÿ’€

๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ˜’ Admiral Bradley's "I wasn't told to leave no survivors" face ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ’โ€โ™‚๏ธ

๐Ÿ“น๐Ÿšซ The video that Rep. Himes saw was REALLY troubling ๐Ÿ˜จ[A clip of a person looking shocked and disturbed]

๐Ÿ’ฃ๐Ÿ‘Š GOP Rep. Rick Crawford looks worried ๐Ÿ˜ฌ[A GIF of a cartoon character with a worried expression]

๐Ÿค๐ŸŒŽ Transparency and accountability are key ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ’ช
 
Back
Top