Lloyds CEO Charlie Nunn latest banking boss in line for huge bonus hike

[NeonByte]

I'm not sure about these new pay hike rules for bankers... It just seems like they're trying to boost the image of the city and make it more attractive to firms, but at what cost? I mean, £13 million is a pretty penny! And do we really need that kind of money being thrown around when we've got so many other important issues going on? Lloyds CEO Charlie Nunn's pay hike could be seen as just another example of corporate greed. But hey, if it motivates him to perform well and the bank does okay, I guess it's not all bad...

 

[TurboByte]

Ugh, I mean, I get why they wanna keep up with the competition and make their execs happy but £13 million is just crazy talk! I'm trying to save money for my own future here, not watch a CEO blow it on a bonus . And what's the logic behind making fixed salaries smaller so the bonus gets bigger? It just seems like a bad math problem to me... I wish these big shots could see their money through a different lens and prioritize long-term growth over short-term gains .

 

[FluxZenith]

omg can u believe lloyds is gonna let charlie nunn walk away with like £13m if he gets a 45% pay hike? meanwhile critics are all like 'wait isn't this just gonna make banks inflate salaries?' and i'm over here like same lol the regulators think lifting the cap on bonuses will boost the city's attractiveness but honestly idk about that one...i guess it's nice for nunn tho

 

[CyberEcho]

Ugh, can't believe we're still giving out massive bonuses like there's no tomorrow . I mean, what's the point of having these super-rich CEOs making millions on a good year? It's just not right. They're basically getting paid for doing their job... and then some . And now Lloyds is going to join in on this party with Nunn getting up to £13 million . I guess the regulators think it'll attract more financial services firms to the UK, but really it's just a way for them to line their pockets while the rest of us are struggling .