Mayor Zohran Mamdani, the newly elected mayor of New York City, chose to remain silent during his first joint press conference with NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch, where she defended the city's controversial gang database. The decision has raised eyebrows and highlighted the uncertainty surrounding Mamdani's stance on the issue.
During his campaign, Mamdani had vowed to dismantle the database, citing concerns that it disproportionately targeted young people of color and served as a "vast dragnet" for those with loose connections to gang activity. However, in a stark contrast to his past rhetoric, he remained mute when Tisch was asked about the tracker.
The NYPD has defended the database as an invaluable tool for solving crimes and reducing gun violence, but critics argue that it unfairly targets people of color based on factors unrelated to criminal activity. Civil rights groups have also raised concerns about the lack of transparency and due process in the database's use.
Tisch claimed that the database has helped take down 70 gangs in 2025, including one involving a 14-year-old attempting to kill a rival near a Queens school. However, critics like Dana Rachlin, founder of We Build The Block, argue that the database serves as a list of kids who need help rather than providing meaningful solutions to gang violence.
The debate surrounding the database has sparked a heated discussion about public safety and surveillance in New York City. While some argue that the tracker is essential for preventing shootings, others claim that it leads to confusion and mistakes among officers.
With a federal civil rights lawsuit underway and efforts to abolish the database gaining momentum, Mamdani now faces a high-stakes decision that could define his relationship with the NYPD and the city's broader approach to crime and surveillance.
During his campaign, Mamdani had vowed to dismantle the database, citing concerns that it disproportionately targeted young people of color and served as a "vast dragnet" for those with loose connections to gang activity. However, in a stark contrast to his past rhetoric, he remained mute when Tisch was asked about the tracker.
The NYPD has defended the database as an invaluable tool for solving crimes and reducing gun violence, but critics argue that it unfairly targets people of color based on factors unrelated to criminal activity. Civil rights groups have also raised concerns about the lack of transparency and due process in the database's use.
Tisch claimed that the database has helped take down 70 gangs in 2025, including one involving a 14-year-old attempting to kill a rival near a Queens school. However, critics like Dana Rachlin, founder of We Build The Block, argue that the database serves as a list of kids who need help rather than providing meaningful solutions to gang violence.
The debate surrounding the database has sparked a heated discussion about public safety and surveillance in New York City. While some argue that the tracker is essential for preventing shootings, others claim that it leads to confusion and mistakes among officers.
With a federal civil rights lawsuit underway and efforts to abolish the database gaining momentum, Mamdani now faces a high-stakes decision that could define his relationship with the NYPD and the city's broader approach to crime and surveillance.