Men need twice as much exercise as women to lower heart disease risk, study finds

Study Reveals Men Need Twice as Much Exercise as Women to Lower Heart Disease Risk

A recent study published in Nature Cardiovascular Research has found that men need twice as much exercise as women to achieve the same reduction in coronary heart disease risk. Researchers analyzed physical activity records from over 80,000 participants and discovered that women who exercised for just 250 minutes a week could lower their heart disease risk by 30%, compared to nearly nine hours of exercise per week for men.

The study builds on previous research that suggests women benefit more than men from the same amount of exercise, but also reveals that women are generally less physically active and less likely to meet recommended exercise targets. According to the NHS guidelines, both men and women aged 16-64 should aim for at least 150 minutes of moderate exercise or 75 minutes of vigorous exercise per week, combined with muscle-strengthening activities twice a week.

However, the latest study highlights the need for tailored advice specifically for men and women, emphasizing that women can achieve significant health benefits with much less exercise. Globally, one in three women die from cardiovascular disease, underscoring the importance of this research.

The researchers' analysis showed that while both sexes could gain substantial cardiovascular benefits from physical activity, women who exercised regularly had a significantly lower risk of heart disease and even death compared to men. The study's findings suggest that sex-specific strategies should be incorporated into guidelines to optimize cardiovascular health for women.

Experts point to differences in sex hormones, muscle fibers, and the body's ability to break down sugar as potential factors contributing to the observed differences in exercise benefits between men and women. The study's lead author notes that tailored interventions could encourage more physically inactive women to engage in regular exercise, thereby reducing their cardiovascular risk.

In a related article, Dr. Emily Lau emphasizes the need for sex-specific strategies to optimize cardiovascular health for women, stating that "one size really does not fit all" and calling for action to develop targeted interventions to address these differences.
 
I'm like totally shocked by this study ๐Ÿคฏ! I mean, I knew exercise was important, but I had no idea how much more men need than women! Like, 250 minutes a week is just chillin' on the couch for me ๐Ÿ˜ด... and that's supposed to lower heart disease risk by 30%?! For women, it's like, literally half the time ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ. And what's crazy is, women are way less active overall ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™€๏ธ. I'm all about promoting exercise, but now I feel like we need to be super specific about how much and how often men and women should move their bodies ๐Ÿšจ. Maybe it's because of those sex hormones or whatever... idk ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. What do you guys think? Should we just make separate fitness plans for dudes and dudettes? ๐Ÿ˜‚
 
๐Ÿค” I'm kinda surprised by this study, right? ๐Ÿ“Š Men need twice as much exercise as women to lower their heart disease risk? That's a pretty stark difference. ๐Ÿ’ช Women who exercise for 250 minutes a week are basically good to go, while men need nearly 9 hours of exercise to achieve the same benefits! ๐Ÿ•’ It just goes to show that we need to tailor our fitness advice to each gender. ๐Ÿ‘ฅ I mean, it's not like women can't handle some serious sweat seshes... but apparently they do better with less. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ And did you see the stats on cardiovascular disease affecting women globally? 1 in 3 women die from it... that's just crazy! ๐Ÿ˜ฑ We need to get more women exercising and taking care of themselves! ๐Ÿ’ช
 
๐Ÿค” I mean think about it, men and women are just wired differently, you know? Like, men have way more testosterone pumping around, which can make them wanna be more aggressive with their exercise routine... get that adrenaline rush, you feel me? ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ’ช Meanwhile, women got this whole oxytocin thing going on, which is like super chill and relaxing, so they might not need to be as intense with their workouts to get the same benefits. And let's not forget about body composition โ€“ men generally got more muscle mass than women, so even less exercise can still give them a solid cardiovascular workout. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ It's all about understanding these differences and creating exercises that cater to individual needs... I'm no expert, but it just seems like common sense, you know? ๐Ÿ˜Š
 
๐Ÿค” seems like the exercise recommendations should be adjusted based on gender... 250 minutes a week for women might seem like a lot, but it's actually less than men need ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™‚๏ธ, maybe they just don't move around as much? ๐Ÿ’ก it'd be great to see some tailored advice for women, you know, encourage more of them to get moving ๐Ÿ‘ต
 
๐Ÿค” I'm kinda surprised by this study, you know? Like, I always thought we're supposed to be told to exercise more as men, but it turns out women need way less time to see the same benefits! ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ It's like our bodies are just wired differently or something. And honestly, it makes sense that the NHS guidelines should take this into account - I mean, who wouldn't want to hear they can get the same health benefits with a quarter of the exercise? ๐Ÿ˜‚ But what I find really interesting is how we're being told we need tailored advice for both men and women. Like, let's focus on getting more people moving, regardless of sex! ๐ŸŒŸ
 
I gotta say, this new study is pretty eye-opening ๐Ÿค”. It's crazy how much more exercise men need to do compared to women to have the same heart health benefits! I mean, 9 hours a week is a lot of sweat ๐Ÿ’ฆ. And it makes sense that sex hormones and muscle fibers play a role in how our bodies respond to exercise - isn't there some cool science behind this? ๐Ÿงฌ Anyway, I hope this study inspires more women to get moving and prioritize their health - they're literally saving themselves from so much risk ๐Ÿ˜Š.
 
๐Ÿค” this is so mind blowin' men have been thinkin they can just chill on the couch while women are out killin it with fitness ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ but honestly it makes sense exercise releases endorphins which is like a natural happy pill ๐Ÿ’†โ€โ™€๏ธ and women's bodies just work differently maybe it's those hormones or whatever but we need to start treatin men and women as individuals not just lumpin them together ๐Ÿ‘ฅ
 
๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ I mean, it's no surprise that men need more exercise than women, but still 250 minutes a week is pretty chill ๐Ÿ˜‚. I was talking to my fitness buddy the other day and we were just saying how women are always getting a bad rap when it comes to exercise. Like, women can totally crush a workout if they want to ๐Ÿ’ช. It's not like men have an advantage or anything (although, let's be real, protein shakes are pretty great for muscle gain ๐Ÿน). Seriously though, it's all about finding what works for you and your body, regardless of sex. We need more research on women's fitness goals and how to get them moving in a healthy way ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™€๏ธ. And can we please just say that one-size-doesn't-fit-all is SO last season? ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ
 
๐Ÿค” I mean, can you believe it? Men need way more exercise than women to even be close to the same heart disease risk! Like, 9 hours a week is a lot, right? And what's up with this "one size fits all" thing, huh? Women are already less active, so why not tailor the advice for them instead of expecting them to magically become like men? ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ It's not about being lazy or whatever, it's just that our bodies work differently. I'm glad they're saying something, but come on, let's get some tailored advice already! ๐Ÿ’ช
 
๐Ÿค” men need way more exercise than womens get it, its like they wanna say womens are lazy or smthn ๐Ÿ™„ 150 mins of moderate exercise per week is def not enough for womens, especially considering how hard life can be for them in general, plus all the factors mentioned like hormones and muscle fibers... just not fair ๐Ÿ’ช womens shouldnt have to do more than mens, thats all i think about it ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
Ugh, can't believe I'm spending my Saturday reading about this ๐Ÿคฏ. I mean, who needs to exercise 9 hours a week when you could just do 250 minutes a week? Sounds like a total joke to me ๐Ÿ˜‚. But seriously, it's not exactly rocket science - if men need more exercise, why can't we just give them some guidance on how to get started? ๐Ÿค”. I'm so over these studies that always seem to focus on the most basic stuff... "oh, women need less exercise" yadda yadda. Can't they just tell us how to actually do it? ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ.
 
๐Ÿค” i mean think about it guys if men need twice as much exercise as women to lower their heart disease risk that just seems kinda backwards right? shouldn't both sexes be on an equal playing field when it comes to staying healthy? maybe the difference in benefits is because women are generally less physically active to begin with so they need a more significant push to get moving ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™€๏ธ. anyway i'm not saying men get a free pass or anything but this study just highlights how much we still have to learn about how exercise affects our bodies and how we can tailor our approaches to be more effective for everyone ๐Ÿ’ช
 
๐Ÿค” I'm kinda surprised by this study, gotta say... i mean, I always thought exercise was a one-size-fits-all kinda thing, but apparently it's not ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ’ช. So women need way less exercise than men to lower heart disease risk? That's wild! ๐ŸŒŽ Like, what even is the deal with that? Is it 'cause of all those hormones and stuff they talk about in the article? I don't know, science, you're like... magic or something ๐Ÿ”ฎ. But seriously, this just goes to show how complex our bodies are, and we need more research like this to figure out why some things work better for men vs women ๐Ÿค“.
 
๐Ÿค” imo, its kinda weird that men need way more exercise than women to get the same benefits... like, what even is the deal with that? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ do we really think its just about biology or hormones or whatever? ๐Ÿ™„ i mean, i know everyone's different and all, but this study seems kinda obvious. shouldnt we be focusing on getting people moving in general, regardless of sex? ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ’ช
 
๐Ÿค” I'm all for more exercise being recommended for both men and women, but the fact that men need twice as much is kinda weird. I mean, what's up with that? Can't we just say everyone needs at least 300 minutes of moderate exercise per week or something? ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ It seems like it's almost like the researchers are saying one size doesn't fit all, but in a way that's super specific to sex.

I also get why there's a need for tailored advice, especially given how much cardiovascular disease affects women. But at the same time, I think we should be focusing on getting more people moving, regardless of whether they're men or women. Can't we just say let's all aim for 300 minutes of exercise per week and worry about the specifics later? ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ It seems like this research is highlighting some major differences between men and women, but I'm not sure it's going far enough to actually make a real difference in people's lives.
 
Ugh, can you believe this?! ๐Ÿคฏ Men need TWICE as much exercise than women to lower heart disease risk? That's just insane! Like, what's the point of even trying if men are just gonna have to put in double the effort? And 250 minutes a week for women is like, nothing! I mean, I know it's better than nothing, but come on, who has that kind of time? ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ I've been meaning to get more exercise myself, but honestly, I'm just too busy. How am I supposed to fit in all those extra minutes when my life is already packed? And don't even get me started on how this study perpetuates the idea that women are less capable or less motivated than men. Like, what about us who are just trying to balance everything and can't possibly dedicate hours a week to exercise? It's so unfair! ๐Ÿ˜ฉ
 
Back
Top