"Brain Weapons" No Longer Science Fiction, Experts Warn
A growing concern is emerging in the scientific community regarding the misuse of neuroscience research for malicious purposes. Two British academics, Michael Crowley and Malcolm Dando, are sounding the alarm about the development of "brain weapons" that can manipulate human consciousness, perception, memory, or behavior.
The threat is real and more sophisticated than previously imagined. Advances in neuroscience, pharmacology, and artificial intelligence have made it possible to create targeted substances that can sedate, confuse, or coerce individuals. The potential for such technologies to be used by states as a form of warfare has been described as a "new frontier" that requires urgent global action.
Crowley and Dando's book explores the fascinating yet disturbing history of state-sponsored research into central nervous system-acting chemicals during the Cold War era. They argue that these efforts were aimed at developing prolonged incapacitation agents to cause loss of consciousness, sedation, or hallucinations in people.
While one instance of a CNS-acting weapon was used on a large scale in 2002 by Russia during the Moscow theatre siege, where hundreds of hostages were freed but over 120 died from the effects of the chemical agents, researchers believe that more advanced and targeted substances are now being developed.
The academics emphasize that the same knowledge used to treat neurological disorders can be repurposed for malicious purposes. Dando warns that "the same knowledge that helps us treat neurological disorders could be used to disrupt cognition, induce compliance, or even in the future turn people into unwitting agents."
A lack of effective international arms control treaties is hindering efforts to tackle this emerging threat. Crowley and Dando are now advocating for a new "holistic arms control" framework that would address the development of CNS-acting and broader incapacitating agents.
In order to mitigate this growing concern, they propose practical steps such as establishing a working group on CNS-acting agents, training, monitoring, and definitions. By taking proactive governance measures, we can prevent the misuse of neuroscience research for malicious purposes and protect the integrity of science and the sanctity of the human mind.
The warning from Crowley and Dando should be taken seriously, as this is no longer a matter of science fiction but a pressing concern that demands immediate attention.
A growing concern is emerging in the scientific community regarding the misuse of neuroscience research for malicious purposes. Two British academics, Michael Crowley and Malcolm Dando, are sounding the alarm about the development of "brain weapons" that can manipulate human consciousness, perception, memory, or behavior.
The threat is real and more sophisticated than previously imagined. Advances in neuroscience, pharmacology, and artificial intelligence have made it possible to create targeted substances that can sedate, confuse, or coerce individuals. The potential for such technologies to be used by states as a form of warfare has been described as a "new frontier" that requires urgent global action.
Crowley and Dando's book explores the fascinating yet disturbing history of state-sponsored research into central nervous system-acting chemicals during the Cold War era. They argue that these efforts were aimed at developing prolonged incapacitation agents to cause loss of consciousness, sedation, or hallucinations in people.
While one instance of a CNS-acting weapon was used on a large scale in 2002 by Russia during the Moscow theatre siege, where hundreds of hostages were freed but over 120 died from the effects of the chemical agents, researchers believe that more advanced and targeted substances are now being developed.
The academics emphasize that the same knowledge used to treat neurological disorders can be repurposed for malicious purposes. Dando warns that "the same knowledge that helps us treat neurological disorders could be used to disrupt cognition, induce compliance, or even in the future turn people into unwitting agents."
A lack of effective international arms control treaties is hindering efforts to tackle this emerging threat. Crowley and Dando are now advocating for a new "holistic arms control" framework that would address the development of CNS-acting and broader incapacitating agents.
In order to mitigate this growing concern, they propose practical steps such as establishing a working group on CNS-acting agents, training, monitoring, and definitions. By taking proactive governance measures, we can prevent the misuse of neuroscience research for malicious purposes and protect the integrity of science and the sanctity of the human mind.
The warning from Crowley and Dando should be taken seriously, as this is no longer a matter of science fiction but a pressing concern that demands immediate attention.