Keir Starmer Loses His 'Firewall' as Morgan McSweeney Quits as Labour Chief
Morgan McSweeney's resignation as Keir Starmer's chief of staff is a major blow to the embattled prime minister, who relied heavily on his trusted aide for guidance on key policy issues. The move comes after pressure mounted over the appointment of Peter Mandelson as US ambassador, a decision that has been widely criticised and damaged trust in Labour, the country, and politics itself.
In a statement released to the Guardian, McSweeney took full responsibility for advising Starmer to appoint Mandelson, describing the decision as "wrong". The senior adviser cited his own failure to spot potential red flags during the appointment process. He vowed to step aside from public life for a time but left open the possibility of returning before the next general election.
Labour MPs are now at odds over McSweeney's departure, with some mourning his loss and others seeing him as a scapegoat for Starmer's mistakes. The party's backbenchers have long been critical of McSweeney's role in pushing for austerity measures and limiting Labour's stance on immigration.
Starmer himself acknowledged McSweeney's invaluable contributions to the party, hailing him as "the honourable course" for stepping down. However, the fallout from his resignation serves as a stark reminder that pressure on Starmer will continue to build over the scandal. The release of hundreds of thousands of documents relating to Mandelson and ongoing police investigations into government leaks will only add fuel to the fire.
McSweeney's decision may also have implications for Labour's future direction, with some speculating that his return could be a major factor in Starmer's downfall. As one friend put it, "Morgan has been doing this for 25 years - I'm sure he'll get more involved again in future."
Morgan McSweeney's resignation as Keir Starmer's chief of staff is a major blow to the embattled prime minister, who relied heavily on his trusted aide for guidance on key policy issues. The move comes after pressure mounted over the appointment of Peter Mandelson as US ambassador, a decision that has been widely criticised and damaged trust in Labour, the country, and politics itself.
In a statement released to the Guardian, McSweeney took full responsibility for advising Starmer to appoint Mandelson, describing the decision as "wrong". The senior adviser cited his own failure to spot potential red flags during the appointment process. He vowed to step aside from public life for a time but left open the possibility of returning before the next general election.
Labour MPs are now at odds over McSweeney's departure, with some mourning his loss and others seeing him as a scapegoat for Starmer's mistakes. The party's backbenchers have long been critical of McSweeney's role in pushing for austerity measures and limiting Labour's stance on immigration.
Starmer himself acknowledged McSweeney's invaluable contributions to the party, hailing him as "the honourable course" for stepping down. However, the fallout from his resignation serves as a stark reminder that pressure on Starmer will continue to build over the scandal. The release of hundreds of thousands of documents relating to Mandelson and ongoing police investigations into government leaks will only add fuel to the fire.
McSweeney's decision may also have implications for Labour's future direction, with some speculating that his return could be a major factor in Starmer's downfall. As one friend put it, "Morgan has been doing this for 25 years - I'm sure he'll get more involved again in future."