Composer Nico Muhly explores how dancers are reimagining his music by notating rhythm in ways that diverge from traditional Western systems. He recalls being 13 years old when he memorized Stravinsky's Symphony in Three Movements, only to be shocked upon seeing the score for its unfamiliar notation. This experience highlights the importance of empathy between composers and interpreters.
Muhly notes that choreographers often impose their own form of notation on movement, creating an alternative cartography that dancers can understand intuitively. He believes this relationship is grounded in a unique community-specific structure of time, which diverges from the universalized Gregorian calendar. This approach allows for a shared vocabulary but also highlights individual differences in perception.
In his latest collaborations, Muhly observes how choreographers are using distinct strategies to interact with his music. Michael Keegan-Dolan has taken a folk ballad and imposed a ritualistic structure, while Jules Cunningham has used drone-based pieces that incorporate tight rhythms within phrases. Maud Le Pladec's dancers adhere closely to the music, interpreting it as having an internal pulse.
Muhly reflects on his own process of notating rhythm, recognizing the need for personal precision and empathy with future interpreters. He believes that watching dance rehearsals is surreal yet fascinating, providing insight into how movement interacts with music. This connection reveals a larger heartbeat that transcends traditional notation systems.
When attending performances, Muhly encourages listeners to pay attention to how tightly the movement adheres to the music. Does it reinforce or resist the patterns? Or does it add complexity? The body-based approach of choreographers and dancers highlights the rich and complex experience of music, challenging our understanding of rhythm and structure.
Muhly notes that choreographers often impose their own form of notation on movement, creating an alternative cartography that dancers can understand intuitively. He believes this relationship is grounded in a unique community-specific structure of time, which diverges from the universalized Gregorian calendar. This approach allows for a shared vocabulary but also highlights individual differences in perception.
In his latest collaborations, Muhly observes how choreographers are using distinct strategies to interact with his music. Michael Keegan-Dolan has taken a folk ballad and imposed a ritualistic structure, while Jules Cunningham has used drone-based pieces that incorporate tight rhythms within phrases. Maud Le Pladec's dancers adhere closely to the music, interpreting it as having an internal pulse.
Muhly reflects on his own process of notating rhythm, recognizing the need for personal precision and empathy with future interpreters. He believes that watching dance rehearsals is surreal yet fascinating, providing insight into how movement interacts with music. This connection reveals a larger heartbeat that transcends traditional notation systems.
When attending performances, Muhly encourages listeners to pay attention to how tightly the movement adheres to the music. Does it reinforce or resist the patterns? Or does it add complexity? The body-based approach of choreographers and dancers highlights the rich and complex experience of music, challenging our understanding of rhythm and structure.