In Myanmar's war-torn landscape, a second phase of military-run elections has descended upon the nation, sparking widespread criticism and skepticism. The junta, which seized power in 2021, has long been accused of orchestrating a sham exercise designed to consolidate its grip on power.
The 2020 election, in which Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy party dominated the polls, is now a distant memory. Suu Kyi herself has been detained, along with dozens of other opposition leaders, and her party has been dissolved under dubious circumstances. Rebel groups have refused to participate in this second round of elections.
The military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) is heavily favored to win the election, despite low voter turnout in the first phase, which saw only 52.13% participation. Critics argue that the playing field was unfairly tilted in favor of the junta, with laws designed to suppress opposition voices.
According to analysts, including Richard Horsey of Crisis Group, the USDP is on track for a landslide victory, one that will hardly be a surprise given the significant advantages it has enjoyed. The international community remains deeply divided over the legitimacy of these elections, with many Western countries and human rights groups labeling them a farce.
The junta claims that the election will bring stability and a brighter future to Myanmar, but this assessment is widely disputed. The country is grappling with one of Asia's worst humanitarian crises, with at least 16,600 civilians killed and 3.6 million displaced since the coup. Any military-controlled government would likely face significant international skepticism.
Min Aung Hlaing, the junta chief, sidestepped questions about his own ambitions during a recent visit to central Myanmar, instead hailing the election as a success and urging authorities to boost turnout further. His assertion that the election can be considered successful is met with widespread incredulity.
The 2020 election, in which Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy party dominated the polls, is now a distant memory. Suu Kyi herself has been detained, along with dozens of other opposition leaders, and her party has been dissolved under dubious circumstances. Rebel groups have refused to participate in this second round of elections.
The military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) is heavily favored to win the election, despite low voter turnout in the first phase, which saw only 52.13% participation. Critics argue that the playing field was unfairly tilted in favor of the junta, with laws designed to suppress opposition voices.
According to analysts, including Richard Horsey of Crisis Group, the USDP is on track for a landslide victory, one that will hardly be a surprise given the significant advantages it has enjoyed. The international community remains deeply divided over the legitimacy of these elections, with many Western countries and human rights groups labeling them a farce.
The junta claims that the election will bring stability and a brighter future to Myanmar, but this assessment is widely disputed. The country is grappling with one of Asia's worst humanitarian crises, with at least 16,600 civilians killed and 3.6 million displaced since the coup. Any military-controlled government would likely face significant international skepticism.
Min Aung Hlaing, the junta chief, sidestepped questions about his own ambitions during a recent visit to central Myanmar, instead hailing the election as a success and urging authorities to boost turnout further. His assertion that the election can be considered successful is met with widespread incredulity.