Netflix Says if the HBO Merger Makes It Too Expensive, You Can Always Cancel

Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos recently testified before the US Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights, expressing concerns that if Netflix were to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery's streaming and movie studios businesses, it could become too expensive for consumers.

In his testimony, Sarandos downplayed fears of a monopoly, citing YouTube's high TV viewership as an example of how even large companies can remain competitive in the market. He argued that the merger between Netflix and HBO Max would actually create more value for consumers, rather than driving up prices.

To address concerns about affordability, Sarandos stated that Netflix has a "one-click cancel" option, which allows subscribers to easily cancel their service if they feel it's too expensive. He also claimed that the streaming industry is still highly competitive, with companies like Google, Apple, and Amazon vying for market share.

Furthermore, Sarandos pointed out that despite adding more subscribers, Netflix has previously raised prices without negatively affecting consumer affordability. He argued that the merger would "create more value for consumers" by providing a more extensive range of content options.

Sarandos also emphasized that Netflix views Warner Bros. Discovery as both a competitor and a supplier, highlighting the complementary nature of their respective streaming services. According to Sarandos, 80% of HBO Max subscribers also subscribe to Netflix, indicating a mutually beneficial relationship between the two companies.

However, concerns about the potential impact on prices remain a significant issue in the ongoing debate over the proposed merger. As one Democratic senator asked during the hearing, how can Netflix ensure that streaming remains affordable after a merger?

In response, Sarandos stated that he is working with the US Department of Justice to establish guardrails against further price hikes. While the executive acknowledged that some price increases have occurred in the past, he emphasized that these hikes came with significant value for subscribers.

Ultimately, the outcome of this merger and its potential impact on consumer affordability remains uncertain. As Sarandos himself noted during his testimony, consumers can always choose to cancel their service if they feel it's too expensive โ€“ a reassuring message for those who worry about the long-term effects of this proposed acquisition.
 
idk why ppl are still worried bout this merger tho ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. sarandos is like "hey, we're not gonna make u pay more" and then he gives examples of youtube and google and amazon being competitive too. it's all about consumer choice, rite? if u dont wanna pay more, just cancel ur netflix sub ๐Ÿ‘‹. but at the same time, its hard 2 argue that having more content options wont increase prices. sarandos seems pretty confident in his plan tho ๐Ÿ’ช
 
I think Ted Sarandos has a point ๐Ÿค”, but I'm still worried about the potential price hikes ๐Ÿ’ธ. I mean, he mentioned that Netflix already raised prices in the past and nobody seemed to care ๐Ÿค‘... but that's exactly what's got me concerned ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. 80% of HBO Max subscribers also subscribe to Netflix? That does sound mutually beneficial ๐Ÿ“บ, but how much more will they raise our bills when combined ๐Ÿ’ธ?

It's not just about the price hike though ๐Ÿค”, it's about the value we get for that money ๐Ÿค‘. Sarandos said there would be more content options, which sounds great ๐Ÿ˜Š... but what if the quality of those shows drops? That's something to consider ๐Ÿ‘€. I guess only time will tell if Netflix can really make this merger work without screwing over consumers ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ.
 
I gotta say, I'm a bit skeptical about Netflix trying to downplay concerns about a monopoly... ๐Ÿค” I mean, think about it - one company owning all these streaming services and studios could be pretty scary for consumers. And what's with Sarandos' example of YouTube? Yeah, they're big, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're not vulnerable to antitrust laws.

I also don't buy the whole "one-click cancel" thing... ๐Ÿ“บ it sounds like a convenient way to placate worried consumers without actually addressing any real issues. And have you seen Netflix's prices lately? They've already raised them multiple times, and I'm not sure how that's going to change now.

But you know what does make me think - those stats about 80% of HBO Max subscribers also being Netflix subs... that suggests some serious overlap between their services. Maybe Sarandos is onto something with the "complementary nature" thing? Or maybe we're just seeing more corporate speak ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ anyway, it's all a bit of a murky situation right now! ๐Ÿ˜
 
I dunno if Ted Sarandos is being honest or not ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ about how affordable Netflix would be after merging with HBO Max... I mean, 80% of HBO Max subscribers are already using Netflix? That's a pretty big overlap... and what about the one-click cancel option? Sounds kinda like just making it easier to leave if you don't like the price... Anyway, Sarandos seems like he's trying to convince us that this merger will be a good thing for consumers ๐Ÿค‘
 
I think Ted Sarandos has got a point ๐Ÿค”... I mean, YouTube is like, super popular with TV viewers and all that ๐Ÿ“บ, so even big companies can still compete in the market, right? ๐Ÿ’ธ It's true that Netflix already raises prices sometimes, but it seems to work out okay for consumers ๐Ÿ™ƒ. And Sarandos' point about 80% of HBO Max subscribers also subscribing to Netflix is pretty interesting ๐Ÿค... like, they're basically best buds in the streaming world ๐Ÿ˜‚. But still, some people are gonna be worried about prices going up ๐Ÿ’ธ... Sarandos saying he's working with the DOJ on guardrails sounds good though ๐Ÿ‘
 
come on... sarandos is just regurgitating what every other big corp says - "we'll keep prices low" ๐Ÿคฃ yeah right! he's basically saying that if they merge, they'll just pass on the savings to consumers, but we all know how that works out. the truth is, the more content options you have, the more choice means less control for consumers. and let's be real, warner bros discovery is not like youtube - it's a movie studio! sarandos thinks 80% of hbo max subscribers also subscribe to netflix? that's just some fancy math to make their merger look legit ๐Ÿค‘
 
๐Ÿค” I'm not sure how believable Ted Sarandos' claim is that adding more content will make streaming cheaper... ๐Ÿค‘ I mean, let's be real, we all know how quickly prices go up when a big company gets its hands on something new. Like what happened with their last price hike? ๐Ÿ˜• Still, I guess it's good to hear that Netflix has a "one-click cancel" option just in case... ๐Ÿ‘ That sounds like a pretty reasonable safety net for consumers. But still, the more I think about it, the more I wonder if Sarandos is just trying to reassure everyone and avoid any real scrutiny ๐Ÿ˜
 
I THINK IT'S A BIG DEAL THAT NETFLIX IS TALKING ABOUT HOW THEY'RE GOING TO KEEP PRICES FROM RISING AFTER THIS MERGER!!! ๐Ÿค‘ I MEAN, WEVE SEEN THEM RAISE THEIR PRICES BEFORE AND YET PEOPLE STILL KEEP SUBSCRIBING, BUT IM NOT SURE IF ITS JUSTCAUSE OF CONTENT VALUE OR SOMETHING ELSE. AND YOu KNOW WHATS CRAZY? SARANDOS IS ACTUALLY TRYING TO CALM PEOPLE DOWN BY SAYING WE CAN ALWAYS CLICK THAT ONE-CHECK BOX TO CANCEL, WHICH I GUESS IS A GOOD THING. BUT SERIOUSLY, HOW ARE THEY GOING TO KEEP IT AFFORDABLE FOR ALL USERS????
 
Back
Top