Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos recently testified before the US Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights, expressing concerns that if Netflix were to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery's streaming and movie studios businesses, it could become too expensive for consumers.
In his testimony, Sarandos downplayed fears of a monopoly, citing YouTube's high TV viewership as an example of how even large companies can remain competitive in the market. He argued that the merger between Netflix and HBO Max would actually create more value for consumers, rather than driving up prices.
To address concerns about affordability, Sarandos stated that Netflix has a "one-click cancel" option, which allows subscribers to easily cancel their service if they feel it's too expensive. He also claimed that the streaming industry is still highly competitive, with companies like Google, Apple, and Amazon vying for market share.
Furthermore, Sarandos pointed out that despite adding more subscribers, Netflix has previously raised prices without negatively affecting consumer affordability. He argued that the merger would "create more value for consumers" by providing a more extensive range of content options.
Sarandos also emphasized that Netflix views Warner Bros. Discovery as both a competitor and a supplier, highlighting the complementary nature of their respective streaming services. According to Sarandos, 80% of HBO Max subscribers also subscribe to Netflix, indicating a mutually beneficial relationship between the two companies.
However, concerns about the potential impact on prices remain a significant issue in the ongoing debate over the proposed merger. As one Democratic senator asked during the hearing, how can Netflix ensure that streaming remains affordable after a merger?
In response, Sarandos stated that he is working with the US Department of Justice to establish guardrails against further price hikes. While the executive acknowledged that some price increases have occurred in the past, he emphasized that these hikes came with significant value for subscribers.
Ultimately, the outcome of this merger and its potential impact on consumer affordability remains uncertain. As Sarandos himself noted during his testimony, consumers can always choose to cancel their service if they feel it's too expensive โ a reassuring message for those who worry about the long-term effects of this proposed acquisition.
In his testimony, Sarandos downplayed fears of a monopoly, citing YouTube's high TV viewership as an example of how even large companies can remain competitive in the market. He argued that the merger between Netflix and HBO Max would actually create more value for consumers, rather than driving up prices.
To address concerns about affordability, Sarandos stated that Netflix has a "one-click cancel" option, which allows subscribers to easily cancel their service if they feel it's too expensive. He also claimed that the streaming industry is still highly competitive, with companies like Google, Apple, and Amazon vying for market share.
Furthermore, Sarandos pointed out that despite adding more subscribers, Netflix has previously raised prices without negatively affecting consumer affordability. He argued that the merger would "create more value for consumers" by providing a more extensive range of content options.
Sarandos also emphasized that Netflix views Warner Bros. Discovery as both a competitor and a supplier, highlighting the complementary nature of their respective streaming services. According to Sarandos, 80% of HBO Max subscribers also subscribe to Netflix, indicating a mutually beneficial relationship between the two companies.
However, concerns about the potential impact on prices remain a significant issue in the ongoing debate over the proposed merger. As one Democratic senator asked during the hearing, how can Netflix ensure that streaming remains affordable after a merger?
In response, Sarandos stated that he is working with the US Department of Justice to establish guardrails against further price hikes. While the executive acknowledged that some price increases have occurred in the past, he emphasized that these hikes came with significant value for subscribers.
Ultimately, the outcome of this merger and its potential impact on consumer affordability remains uncertain. As Sarandos himself noted during his testimony, consumers can always choose to cancel their service if they feel it's too expensive โ a reassuring message for those who worry about the long-term effects of this proposed acquisition.