Our American Queen review – ambition and allegiance on the eve of 1864 US election

A Brooklyn-based production attempts to shed light on the life of a prominent American figure, but ultimately falls short in its exploration of complex themes.

Our American Queen, directed by Christopher McElroen, tells the story of Kate Chase, daughter of Salmon P. Chase, who finds herself entangled in her father's presidential ambitions and personal relationships. The play delves into the intricacies of female power, ambition, and emotional distance, raising intriguing questions about its titular character.

Despite a talented cast, including Wallis Currie-Wood as the enigmatic Kate, the production struggles to balance historical accuracy with dramatic flair. Thomas Klingenstein's script often meanders into exposition, weighing down the dense dialogue and leaving little room for banter or wit. The play's attempts at exploring Kate's inner world are similarly hamstrung, with her intellectual prowess and political machinations confined largely to domestic settings.

The production's technical aspects show promise, particularly in Neal Wilkinson's set design, which effectively captures the grandeur of 19th-century America. However, the enormous dining table that serves as a focal point for much of the play also proves to be a hindrance, limiting character connections and interpersonal dynamics.

One notable exception is the chemistry between Kate and her love interest, John Hay, played by Tom Victor. The pair's flirtatious sparring is expertly nuanced, with both actors conveying vulnerability and repressed emotions that add depth to their characters. Darrell Brockis, who portrays Salmon P. Chase, also delivers a solid performance, although his patchy accent occasionally jars.

Ultimately, the play's greatest challenge lies in reconciling Kate's fictional motivations with her real-world actions. The result is an uneven narrative that leaves audiences uncertain about what drove this formidable woman. Despite its intriguing premise and talented cast, Our American Queen feels like an incomplete portrait of a complex historical figure, one whose full story remains waiting to be told.
 
I feel meh about this production 🤔... I mean, the cast is solid, Wallis Currie-Wood does look like Kate Chase, but the script just doesn't quite work, you know? It's all over the place - sometimes it's like they're trying to cram in too much history and politics, and then other times it feels super slow. And don't even get me started on that dining table... I get why they wanted a grand space, but it kinda takes away from the characters' interactions 🤷‍♀️. The chemistry between Kate and John Hay is on point though! 👍 Tom Victor and Darrell Brockis do their best with the material they've got. And can we talk about how fascinating the real-life story of Kate Chase is? I feel like this production just scratched the surface... maybe a sequel or something? 📚
 
I'm so disappointed with this play 🤕, I mean, it's got all the ingredients for a juicy drama but somehow it just doesn't quite come together. The cast is talented, don't get me wrong, Wallis Currie-Wood shines as Kate Chase, but the script is like, totally lost in its own complexity. It's like they're trying to cram too many themes into one play and it ends up being all over the place 🤯.

And don't even get me started on that dining table 😂, I mean, I love a good historical set design as much as the next person but come on, can't you just have a normal conversation without having to navigate around a giant dinner table? And the chemistry between Kate and John Hay is real though 👀, they've got some great scenes together.

I'm still curious about this Kate Chase character tho, she sounds like such an intriguing figure. I mean, who wouldn't want to watch a play about a strong-willed woman navigating politics and personal relationships in 19th-century America? 🤔 But as it stands, Our American Queen feels like a work in progress 📝, which is kinda frustrating when you can tell they're not quite there yet.
 
I gotta say, I went into this play expecting to be wowed by the subject matter & talented cast... but it was just so meh 🤔. Don't get me wrong, Wallis Currie-Wood as Kate is super solid, and Darrell Brockis's portrayal of her dad is actually really compelling. But overall, I think the script was a bit too focused on explaining everything, which made the whole thing feel kinda slow & plodding 📚. And can we talk about that set design for a sec? Neal Wilkinson nailed it, but sometimes I felt like I was stuck in some kind of 19th-century time loop with all those people around the dining table 🍴. The chemistry between Kate and John Hay though... that's what made me go from "meh" to "actually kinda enjoyed this"... but still, feels like we're missing out on so much with Kate's story 😐
 
🤔 I mean, I love the idea behind this play, right? A strong female lead in the 19th century, exploring themes of power and ambition... it's got potential! But honestly, I felt like I was stuck in a history lesson for most of the show 📚. The dialogue just didn't flow, and I didn't care about Kate's personal life as much as I wanted to. And don't even get me started on that massive dining table - it felt like they were trying too hard to recreate a historical setting instead of focusing on the characters' interactions. 😐 The chemistry between the lead actors was great, though! 👫
 
you know i was thinking... we're all just trying to make sense of these complex lives, right? the american queen's struggles to balance history with drama kinda mirrors our own struggle to reconcile past and present selves. like, how much do we really know about someone just from a few scenes or chapters? can we ever truly grasp their motivations or inner worlds? it's like trying to catch a fleeting idea in mid-air... 🤯
 
I gotta say, I was hyped for this production but it fell flat for me 🤔💔. The cast is on point, especially Wallis Currie-Wood as Kate Chase, she's got the whole 'independent woman' vibe down pat 💁‍♀️. But the writing? Eh, it's like they're trying to cram too much into one play 📚. The pacing is slow and it feels like they're just going through the motions instead of really exploring Kate's character. And don't even get me started on the dialogue 🤦‍♂️. It's like they took all these great themes and ideas and just phoned it in.

The only part that got me was the chemistry between Kate and John Hay, Tom Victor is lowkey amazing as her love interest 💕. And Darrell Brockis does a solid job as Salmon P. Chase, he's just...meh with the accent 🤷‍♂️. Overall, it felt like they missed an opportunity to really dig deep into Kate's life and make this play something special.
 
I'm kinda disappointed in this production 🤔. I think they had a great idea with Kate Chase's story, but it just didn't quite come together. The set design was really cool, loved the 19th-century America vibes 🏛️, and Darrell Brockis's performance as her dad was solid 👍. But the script felt like it was trying to do too much and ended up meandering a bit 😕. I also wished they could've explored Kate's inner world more - we get hints of her intelligence and ambition, but it feels like there's so much more depth that could be dug into 💡. And can we talk about the chemistry between Kate and John Hay? 🤩 It was so nice to see them have some real moments together! Maybe they should've done a sequel or something 😂?
 
I just watched "Our American Queen" and I gotta say, it's like they were trying to tackle too many things at once 🤯 The set design is super impressive, especially the dining table - it's like stepping into a different era 😍 But sometimes I felt like they were just going through the motions instead of really exploring Kate's character. And don't get me wrong, Wallis Currie-Wood and Tom Victor are amazing as her mom and love interest - their chemistry is on point 🤗 But I think they could've done more with the supporting cast, especially with Darrell Brockis' accent... it kind of pulled me out of the story 😐 Overall, I'm still thinking about what Kate's motivations were supposed to be at the end - did they ever really figure that out? 🤔
 
I gotta say, I was really looking forward to this production, but it kinda fell flat for me 🤔. The concept of exploring Kate Chase's life and her complicated relationships with her father and John Hay is super interesting, but the execution just didn't quite live up to my expectations. I mean, the set design was on point, and Wallis Currie-Wood did a great job as Kate, but the dialogue felt like it was stuck in a rut at times, and the pacing was kinda slow 🕰️.

I think one of the biggest problems is that the play tries to tackle too many themes at once, which makes it hard to really dive deep into any of them. The chemistry between Kate and John Hay was really nice, though - they had some great moments on stage 💘. And Darrell Brockis's performance as Salmon P. Chase was solid, even if his accent did take a bit of getting used to.

Overall, I think the play could have benefited from a tighter script and a more focused narrative. As it stands, it feels like an incomplete portrait of Kate Chase, and that's frustrating because I know she's such a fascinating historical figure 🤓. Maybe they can revisit some of these themes in a future production? 🤞
 
I gotta say, I was super hyped for this production but it kinda fell flat 🤔. I think the biggest problem is that they didn't delve deep enough into Kate's complexities and emotions. Like, we know she's smart and ambitious but what about her personal struggles? The way the script just glosses over those things felt really off to me.

And can we talk about how they handled historical accuracy vs drama? It feels like they prioritized one over the other and it shows 🙅‍♂️. I mean, I get that it's hard to balance fact with fiction but this production just didn't pull it off.

I did love the chemistry between Kate and her love interest though 💕. It added a depth to their characters that was missing elsewhere in the play. And Darrell Brockis' performance as Salmon P. Chase was solid, even if his accent needed a bit more work 🤷‍♂️.

But overall, I'm left wondering what could've been done differently to make this production shine ✨. Maybe explore Kate's inner world more? Balance historical accuracy with drama better? I don't know, but it feels like they missed an opportunity to tell a really compelling story 🔥
 
I'm a bit underwhelmed by Our American Queen 🤔. I think the problem is that they're trying to fit too many themes into this play. Female power and ambition are definitely important aspects of Kate's story, but we don't get to see as much depth in her personal life. It feels like they're glossing over some really interesting stuff just to stick to the historical record 📚.

And yeah, the set design is on point! Neal Wilkinson really outdid himself with that dining table 😂. But it's weird how something like that can both work for and against you in a play. The chemistry between Kate and John Hay is amazing, though - they've got some great banter going on 🎭.

I do wish they'd explored Kate's relationships with other women more... there's definitely a story to be told there 💁‍♀️. And can we talk about how confusing it is when historical figures have fictional motivations that don't necessarily add up? It felt like the play was just winging it sometimes 🤦‍♂️.

All in all, I think Our American Queen has some great moments, but it feels like they're missing a few pieces of the puzzle. Maybe with some more development and refinement, we'll get to see Kate Chase's full story 📝.
 
OMG u guys!!! 😱 I'm so disappointed in dis play 🤕 Our American Queen sounds like it has so much potential but it's like they just phoned it in 📞 The casting is on point tho 💁‍♀️ Wallis Currie-Wood as Kate Chase is EVERYTHING 💖 and the chemistry between her and Tom Victor is 🔥 but seriously, can't they balance historical accuracy with drama? 🤔 It feels like they're trying to cram too much into the play 📚 and it's just not working for me 🙅‍♀️ And that dining table tho 😂 why did they even include it?! 🤷‍♀️
 
🤔 I was kinda meh about this play too... I mean, the cast is super talented, but it felt like they were trying to cram way too much into the script 📚. The tech aspects are on point tho! Neal Wilkinson's set design has that 19th-century America vibe down pat 🏰. But for real though, Kate Chase sounds like a fascinating figure, and I'm always here for complex female characters 💁‍♀️. What do you guys think? Shoulda been more nuanced script 🤷‍♂️
 
I'm so disappointed in how they handled the script 🤕 it's like they're glossing over Kate Chase's actual life instead of really digging into her complexities 📚 I mean, we know she was an intelligent and ambitious woman, but they barely scratch that surface 🌟 The set design is dope though, it totally transported me to 19th-century America 🏛️ But the way they portrayed her relationship with John Hay felt kinda forced 💁‍♀️ And what's up with the dining table being a focal point? It's like they're trying too hard for drama instead of just letting the characters speak for themselves 😊
 
I'm really disappointed with how the production of "Our American Queen" handled the portrayal of Kate Chase's life. I think it's a classic case of how politics and power can be mishandled when it comes to storytelling 🤔. The script just didn't balance the historical accuracy with drama well, and that's what's leaving audiences scratching their heads. I mean, we're talking about a woman who played a huge role in shaping America's history, and her story is being reduced to domestic settings? It's like they're trying to sugarcoat her ambition and power struggles 😐. And don't even get me started on the set design – that dining table is a major red flag 🤦‍♀️. Can't we do better than that when it comes to representing an American icon?
 
I think it's still super cool that they're trying to shed light on Kate Chase's life! 🌟 I mean, she was definitely a trailblazer for women in politics back in the day. The set design is pretty amazing, reminds me of my grandma's old house 🏠💡. And that chemistry between Wallis and Tom Victor is undeniable - they had some great banter scenes that made me laugh 😂. What I'd love to see more of is how they could've explored Kate's relationships with other women in her life, it's a huge part of American history, you know? 🤗
 
🤔 I feel meh about this play... the storyline is cool but they didn't do it justice. They tried to fit too many things into the script and it made it hard to focus on Kate's character 📚. The actors were good, especially Wallis Currie-Wood as Kate 👏, but the direction was a bit off. I like how Neal Wilkinson designed the set though, it brought back that old America vibe 🏛️. What really disappointed me was how they handled the chemistry between Kate and John Hay, it was so natural and fun to watch 😊. Maybe next time they'll get it right and tell Kate's full story 🤞
 
Wow! 🤯 I mean, I was really expecting more from the play, but it sounds like they tried to tackle some heavy themes without quite getting it right. The cast is talented though! 🎭 I love how they highlighted Kate's relationship with John Hay - that chemistry between them was definitely a highlight of the show 😊. And Darrell Brockis' accent issues aside, he did solid work as Salmon P. Chase... but yeah, overall it feels like they didn't quite nail the story of Kate Chase 🤔.
 
Back
Top