Pakistani parliament votes to give army chief new powers and legal immunity

Pakistan's parliament has passed a contentious constitutional amendment that grants its army chief unprecedented powers and lifetime immunity from prosecution. Field Marshal Asim Munir, widely seen as Pakistan's de facto ruler, is set to reap the benefits of this 27th constitutional amendment.

Under the new provision, Munir will be elevated to the position of Chief of Defence Forces, overseeing all three military branches and holding significant sway over national security. However, critics argue that he will also be shielded from accountability for any actions taken during his tenure.

"This is a funeral for democracy," said Aqil Shah, an adjunct associate professor at Georgetown University in the US. "Munir has entrenched himself and future chiefs in power through an unprecedented constitutionally protected role."

The amendment grants Munir lifelong immunity from prosecution, essentially making him above reproach. This move undermines the principle of civilian supremacy and could lead to a prolonged period of authoritarian rule.

Moreover, the amendment limits the independence of the supreme court by establishing a new federal constitutional court with judges selected by the executive. The decision on transferring judges will also rest solely with the president, removing any accountability processes.

"This effectively has set us on the way to a lifelong dictatorship in Pakistan," said Salahuddin Ahmed, a constitutional lawyer. "The amendment completely destroys any notion of independence in the judiciary."

Opponents argue that the legislation is designed to enshrine military rule and push Pakistan further towards authoritarianism. Critics also point out that this move follows years of increasing military control over national affairs.

The decision was facilitated by a weak ruling coalition government, led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, which struggled to overcome opposition from the largest party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). The PTI boycotted the vote, and its leadership is currently behind bars.
 
๐Ÿ˜ฌ๐Ÿ‘Š this amendment is like a nightmare come true for pakistan's democracy... asim munir getting lifetime immunity is like a green light to do whatever he wants and still be above the law ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’ช. it's not just about him, but the entire country suffering under his rule ๐Ÿ’”. and now the supreme court is basically a puppet of the president, that's like erasing the very concept of an independent judiciary ๐Ÿคฏ. how long till pakistan becomes another failed state like its neighbors? ๐Ÿค•
 
๐Ÿคฏ just heard about this amendment in Pakistan... totally crazy! I mean, giving the army chief lifetime immunity from prosecution? That's a major red flag, dude ๐Ÿšจ. It's like they're setting him up to be a dictator or something ๐Ÿ’ฅ. And now he gets to run everything - national security, supreme court, the whole nine yards ๐Ÿคฏ. No wonder PTI boycotted the vote... they knew it was fishy ๐ŸŸ. Can you imagine if this happened in the US? Chaos would ensue ๐Ÿ˜ฑ. Pakistan needs to get back on track with its democracy ASAP ๐Ÿ’ช.
 
omg how r u guys feeling about this news ๐Ÿค•?? it's literally a step in the wrong direction for democracy i feel so sad that pakistan is loosing its grip on civilian rule this amendment is like a big red flag waving in the air saying "we don't care about accountability" and it's going to lead to so much suffering if they don't change their minds soon ๐Ÿคž what do u guys think we should be doing to help??
 
Ugh, this is so worrying for Pak's future ๐Ÿค•... I mean, imagine if something like this happened in our own country, during exams or midterms ๐Ÿ“š๐Ÿ˜จ. It's like, who would be in charge then? Our school's principal has the final say on everything, but that's a whole different story... anyway, this is super concerning for Pak's democracy and human rights situation ๐ŸŒŽ๐Ÿ’”
 
๐Ÿค” I'm really worried about this development in Pakistan... it seems like they're taking a huge step backwards in terms of democratic governance ๐Ÿšซ. With this amendment, they're essentially giving their army chief a free pass to act without accountability โš–๏ธ, which is a recipe for disaster ๐ŸŒช๏ธ. It's not just that he'll have more power, but also that the judiciary will be stripped of its independence ๐Ÿคฅ, which would undermine the rule of law and lead to a dystopian nightmare ๐Ÿ˜ฑ. I mean, what's next? Will they be rewriting their constitution on the fly like some sort of authoritarian regime? ๐Ÿ“š This is just so concerning...
 
๐Ÿค” This is a clear case of the military-industrial complex taking hold in Pakistan ๐Ÿšจ. It's like they're trying to turn the country into a one-man show, where Field Marshal Munir gets to call the shots without any checks or balances ๐Ÿ‘Š. And let's not forget about the lifetime immunity from prosecution โ€“ that's just a fancy way of saying he's above the law ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ.

I think this is exactly what some people mean by "democratic backsliding" ๐Ÿ“‰. It's like they're slowly chipping away at the foundations of democracy, piece by piece ๐Ÿ’ช. And now, with the supreme court becoming just another tool for the executive branch to wield power over, it's like they're undermining the very principle of rule of law ๐Ÿค•.

We need to be keeping a close eye on this development and asking ourselves: what's next? Will they try to pack the supreme court with Munir's cronies or install yes-men as judges? It's time for Pakistanis to demand more transparency and accountability from their leaders, especially when it comes to matters of national security ๐Ÿ”’.
 
Ugh, this is so worrying ๐Ÿค•. I mean, think about it - if a military chief can basically be above the law forever, that's a recipe for disaster ๐Ÿ˜จ. It's like they're setting up a system where no one can hold anyone else accountable. And with the supreme court being all but controlled by the executive... *shakes head* This is just bad news for democracy in Pakistan ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ.

I get why people are upset, though - this amendment basically erodes all checks and balances that were supposed to be in place. It's like they're trying to create a situation where only one person has control, which is never healthy ๐Ÿ’”. And it's especially concerning since Pakistan is already struggling with its own set of problems, not just military-related ones.

I wish people would speak out more about this kind of thing... *sigh* I guess we'll just have to keep an eye on what happens next ๐Ÿคž
 
๐Ÿคฏ I'm seriously concerned about this development in Pakistan... It's like they're intentionally creating a power vacuum that only benefits the military, you know? ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ Asim Munir already seems like an influential figure, but now he's basically untouchable? That's not exactly what democracy is all about. ๐Ÿ’” And what's with the lack of transparency around the supreme court appointments? It's like they're playing with fire here... ๐Ÿ”ฅ One thing's for sure - this amendment is a huge step back for civilian supremacy and accountability in Pakistan ๐Ÿค•
 
๐Ÿค” I'm both confused and frustrated with this development... like, how can someone be so certain that a system is broken when it's been working just fine for them all along? ๐Ÿ™„ Asim Munir's got some serious clout now, but does that mean he's above accountability? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ I think he's supposed to be shielded from prosecution, which sounds kinda like a death sentence... no one wants to question the Chief of Defence Forces, right? ๐Ÿ˜’ The amendment seems pretty clear-cut, and yet there are people who think it's some grand conspiracy. Can't we just agree on what's good for Pakistan? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
๐Ÿค” This new amendment in Pakistan's parliament is seriously worrying me... I mean, who gives a lifetime immunity from prosecution to someone? ๐Ÿ™„ It's like they're setting up some sort of permanent dictator scenario. And what about accountability for the army chief's actions? That just doesn't sit right with me.

I'm not sure how much more of this kind of thing we can take... I mean, critics are saying it's a funeral for democracy over here ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ and that future chiefs will be shielded from accountability too... That sounds like a serious slippery slope to me. And what about the supreme court? Limiting their independence is just not cool.

I need some more info on this... Can we get some sources or something? How does this amendment actually work in practice? What's the thinking behind it? I'm all for scrutiny, but at least have a solid argument behind it ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
๐Ÿคฏ this amendment is like something out of a movie where the bad guy gets away with everything... like in that one scene from Game of Thrones when Cersei Lannister pulls off her infamous "I'll do whatever it takes" speech ๐Ÿ“บ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ. It's just not right, especially since Pakistan's trying to push back against its own government. Asim Munir being basically untouchable is like something out of a spy thriller where the bad guy always stays one step ahead ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ”.
 
OMG ๐Ÿคฏ this is soooo bad for democracy in Pakistan! I mean, a field marshal basically becoming the ruler? That's like having a principal who also runs the school, making all decisions without anyone checking them! ๐Ÿค“ It's like they're saying "we don't need checks and balances" and just letting one person have total power. I feel so sorry for the people in Pakistan, it's like their rights are being taken away from them. The fact that the supreme court is being undermined too is really worrying... what's next? ๐Ÿค”
 
๐Ÿค” This constitutional amendment is a concerning development for democratic governance in Pakistan... I think it's essential to acknowledge that the grant of lifetime immunity from prosecution to Field Marshal Asim Munir undermines the principle of civilian supremacy, which is a crucial component of democratic stability ๐Ÿค The fact that he'll have significant sway over national security and oversight all three military branches raises questions about checks and balances in our system... ๐Ÿšซ I'd like to see more critical examination of this amendment from scholars and civil society organizations ๐Ÿ‘ฅ
 
๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ’” This is getting out of hand in Pakistan... another constitutional amendment just to give the army chief more power ๐Ÿคฏ. They're basically making him untouchable, no accountability at all ๐Ÿšซ. It's like they want to erase democracy from the equation entirely ๐Ÿ“‰. And now the supreme court's going to be under executive control? That's a recipe for disaster ๐ŸŒช๏ธ. This is what happens when you have a weak government and a strong military ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. I'm just worried about the future of Pakistan, it's heading in the wrong direction ๐Ÿ˜•.
 
๐Ÿคฏ This is like, totally a power grab ๐Ÿšง! I mean, come on, a 27th constitutional amendment just to give the army chief a free pass? That's not democracy, that's dictatorship ๐Ÿ‘Š. And now they're basically turning the supreme court into a rubber stamp for the president? ๐Ÿคฅ Give me a break! This is a major red flag for Pakistan's future. What's next? A president-for-life? ๐Ÿ˜ฑ I'm surprised the PTI even bothered to show up to this farce of an election... it just goes to show that their warnings about military rule were spot on ๐Ÿ’ก
 
OMG, this is super concerning ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿคฏ! The idea that Field Marshal Asim Munir gets to be above reproach for life? ๐Ÿšซ No way, that's just not right ๐Ÿ’”. It feels like they're taking a huge step back towards military rule and undermining democracy ๐Ÿค–. I'm all about the independence of our judiciary ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™€๏ธ, but this move is basically dismantling it ๐Ÿ˜ข. The fact that the president gets to decide who stays on the bench? ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ That's just not how we're supposed to do things in a democracy ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ. We need to speak out against this and make sure our voices are heard ๐Ÿ’ฌ! #NotMyDictator #DemocracyMatters #JudicialIndependence
 
I'm getting super worried about this new amendment in Pakistan ๐Ÿค•. It's like they're giving their army chief a free pass to do whatever he wants without anyone holding him accountable. I mean, what's next? A president for life? ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ It's all about the military taking control of everything and undermining civilian power.

I've seen some people say that this is just another way of dealing with the opposition, but it feels like a slippery slope to me ๐Ÿš€. Once you grant someone lifetime immunity from prosecution, it's hard to take back the power. And now they're basically stacking the deck with their own judges and whatnot? It's not fair to the people of Pakistan at all.

I think we should be paying closer attention to this one ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Can't let them get away with this without a fight! Maybe some peaceful protests or something to bring awareness about how much this amendment sucks ๐Ÿ˜ก.
 
Ugh, this is getting old... another example of how the platform we use can be super useful for spreading info, but also totally fails to hold those in power accountable ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. I mean, just think about it - a constitutional amendment that basically lets the army chief live forever without facing any consequences? It's like they're trying to make sure he never has to answer for his actions... meanwhile, we're stuck here on this forum, discussing the implications of such a move without being able to take any real action ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. And don't even get me started on how this is all being facilitated by a weak government... it's like they're just pawns in a bigger game. Anyway, I guess what I'm trying to say is that our platform can be really powerful, but we need to make sure we're using it in a way that actually brings about change ๐Ÿš€.
 
Back
Top