Pentagon Makes Largest Known Arms Purchase From Israel — For Banned Cluster Weapons

US Pentagon signs $210 million contract with Israeli company Tomer for cluster munitions, a weapon widely criticized for its indiscriminate killing of civilians. The deal marks the largest known arms purchase from Israel by the US Department of Defense and is seen as atypical given the countries' usually one-way relationship.

Cluster munitions are designed to scatter explosive fragments over a wide area, causing long-term danger to civilians who may not even know they have been affected. They were widely criticized for their use in conflicts such as Vietnam, Laos, Iraq, and Ukraine, with reports of unexploded ordnance still affecting communities decades later.

The $210 million deal will see Tomer produce a new 155mm munition designed to reduce the risk of civilian casualties but critics argue that no amount of technological advancement can make cluster munitions humane. The US Army has admitted that its own testing of similar munitions found high failure rates, with the manufacturer citing low risks in controlled environments.

"This is not just about killing people; it's about causing long-term damage and suffering to communities," said Alma Taslidžan, advocacy manager for Humanity & Inclusion, an organization pushing to ban cluster munitions. "We need a global ban on these weapons."

The deal has raised concerns about the Trump administration's willingness to bypass conventional procurement procedures in favor of lucrative contracts with foreign arms manufacturers. Critics say that this undermines oversight and accountability mechanisms.

The development comes as the Biden administration faces pressure from lawmakers to rethink its approach to cluster munitions, which were banned under international law but remain in use by many countries, including Israel.

With no clear end in sight to the Russia-Ukraine war, where both sides have used cluster munitions extensively, critics warn that the global ban on these weapons is under threat. The Convention on Cluster Munitions has seen several signatory countries reconsider their commitment to the treaty amid fears of conflict with Russia.

As one expert noted, "The US wants all options" when it comes to warfare, and this latest purchase reflects a continued reliance on cluster munitions – even as researchers argue that these weapons are inherently indiscriminate.
 
Umm... just got that news about the US Pentagon signing a $210 million contract with Tomer from Israel 😕 to produce cluster munitions. I'm all like, what's going on here? 🤯 Cluster munitions are literally super bad for civilians - they can cause long-term damage and suffering to whole communities. Like, decades after the conflict is even over.

And now the US Army has tested similar munitions and found high failure rates... but still wants to use them? 🚫 It's not like it's a new tech or anything that's gonna magically make these things humane. I mean, we've seen how they work out in Vietnam, Laos, Iraq, and Ukraine already.

The thing is, this deal has raised so many red flags - like, why did the Pentagon just ignore procurement procedures to go with a lucrative contract? 🤑 And it's not like Israel's exactly known for its transparency when it comes to arms deals either.

I'm all for countries having their own defense strategies, but come on... let's be real, cluster munitions are a big no-no. We need a global ban on these things ASAP! 💥
 
🤔 I'm really worried about this deal, the $210 million contract with Tomer for cluster munitions is just crazy 🤑. Cluster munitions have been widely criticized for their devastating effects on civilians and communities, it's like they're not even trying to minimize harm 🙅‍♂️. The fact that US Army testing found high failure rates doesn't change the fact that these weapons are causing long-term damage and suffering to innocent people 😔.

And what's really concerning is that this deal bypasses conventional procurement procedures, it's like the Trump administration is willing to do whatever it takes to get a good deal 💸. I think this undermines oversight and accountability mechanisms, it's not right to sacrifice transparency for profit 🤑.

I'm all for the US having options in warfare, but at what cost? 🤷‍♂️ The Convention on Cluster Munitions is still under threat and if we don't take a strong stance against these weapons, things might get out of hand 💥. We need to make sure that our leaders are prioritizing human life over military gain 💔.
 
I'm really worried about this deal 🤕... I mean, can't we find a way to avoid causing long-term damage to civilians? Cluster munitions have been around for ages and we still haven't cracked the code on making them more humane. The fact that the US Army has low failure rates in controlled environments doesn't change the fact that these things are designed to kill people in the first place.

I'm not sure what's going on with our procurement procedures, but it seems like we're just throwing money at problems without solving them. And now with the Russia-Ukraine war still ongoing, I worry that this deal is just a drop in the bucket of bigger issues we need to address. Can't we think about the future and the long-term consequences of our actions? 💔
 
I just can't help but think about the human cost of war 🤕. A $210 million contract with Tomer for cluster munitions is like piling fuel on a fire that's already ravaging communities worldwide. These munitions may be designed to reduce civilian casualties, but what's the point if they still cause long-term damage and suffering? It's like asking if a broken mirror can truly fix itself 💔.

I'm also worried about the Trump administration's willingness to cut corners in the name of profit. Are we really willing to sacrifice accountability for the sake of a few million dollars? The consequences of this deal will be felt for generations, not just by civilians but also by the families and communities affected by these devastating munitions 💥.

We need to ask ourselves, is it time to rethink our approach to warfare? Can't we find ways to resolve conflicts without resorting to indiscriminate violence? Maybe we're just too comfortable with the status quo, even when it means perpetuating harm 🤷‍♂️.
 
omg, 210 million dollars for cluster munitions?! 🤯 that's insane! like, what's the point of having tech that reduces civilian casualties if it's still gonna cause long-term damage? 🤔 i mean, can't they just invest in other stuff that doesn't kill ppl? this deal feels like a total money grab. and btw, who approved this contract? 🤑 didn't they do due diligence on the risks involved? 🚨 also, what about the fact that israel uses these weapons in conflicts and still hasn't signed the convention on cluster munitions? 🤷‍♀️ it's just not adding up
 
I just can't believe they're signing off on more cluster munitions 🤯... reminds me of those crazy old days in Vietnam where we had napalm and all sorts of nasty stuff being dropped from the sky. It's like they're trying to recreate a war zone in Ukraine right now. I mean, what's wrong with the US government? Can't they just say no to some big bucks deal for once? 🤑 And don't even get me started on Israel - shouldn't they know better by now? It's all just so... outdated.
 
I'm really worried about this new deal between the US Pentagon and Tomer. I mean, we already know how bad cluster munitions are, right? They're like a ticking time bomb for civilians 🤯. The fact that the US is still buying these and even trying to improve them is just crazy. Like, what's wrong with going for something new and better instead of clinging to outdated tech?

And don't even get me started on how this undermines oversight and accountability mechanisms. It's like the government is more worried about saving a buck than making sure our soldiers aren't hurting innocent people 🤑. And honestly, I think we should be asking ourselves if this is really worth it. Like, what are we going to achieve with these things? Is it just going to be more bloodshed and suffering?

I know some folks might say, "Hey, at least they're trying to reduce the risk of civilian casualties," but let's be real, no amount of tech can make cluster munitions humane 🤷‍♂️. We need a global ban on these things, not just a fancy new version that's supposed to be better.
 
I'm getting so tired of the world we're living in 🤕. $210 million for a weapon that's basically designed to hurt innocent people? It just feels like we've learned nothing from history, you know? I mean, think about all those civilians who got affected by cluster munitions in Vietnam, Laos, Iraq, and Ukraine... decades later, they're still dealing with the consequences. And now the US is just like, "Oh, let's make a new one that's supposedly safer"? Give me a break! 💔

I remember when I was growing up, we used to talk about how cluster munitions were evil, you know? They were like the ultimate symbol of war's brutality. But I guess we've come full circle, and now it seems like we're just trading one kind of atrocity for another. 🤷‍♀️

I wish people would wake up and realize that war is never a solution to anything. We need to be talking about peace, not more bombs and cluster munitions...
 
🤔 $210 million for cluster munitions? 🤑 That's just mind-boggling. I mean, isn't the goal of our military to protect people, not cause long-term damage and suffering? 🌎 It's like they're more concerned with lining their pockets than making a real difference. 💸
 
Back
Top