Manchester City's £65 million transfer deal for Bournemouth striker Antoine Semenyo has left many scratching their heads. The Ghanaian, 25, joins a club that has already signed several high-profile players this summer, including Rayan Cherki and Phil Foden from the right flank. But what makes this deal so peculiar is not just the fee itself, but how little attention it's garnered.
In an era where big transfers are the norm, £65 million seems like a reasonable price tag for a player of Semenyo's abilities: quick, skilful, intelligent, and hardworking. He has four-and-a-half years left on his contract, which is standard in modern football. The market dictates value, and if City can afford it, that's all that matters.
But the question remains: was this transfer a bargain or a misfire? Pedants might point out that Semenyo costs nearly seven times as much as Nordi Mukiele, who signed for Sunderland from Paris Saint-Germain last summer. Supply and demand dictate prices, and if there's interest in Semenyo, the price goes up.
However, not everyone has had a successful stint as a big No 9 this season. Benjamin Sesko, the Slovenian striker who joined Newcastle United, is an anomaly. While he's shown flashes of brilliance, his overall performance has been underwhelming. It's worth noting that Sesko was signed in the same "striker bubble" as Semenyo and Hugo Ekitiké, with all three aiming to fill the role of a prolific goal-scorer.
It seems that old-school No 9s, like the Filippo Inzaghi-style forward, have become relics of the past. The game has changed, and with it, the way coaches approach recruitment. But just because Erling Haaland, the Norwegian striker who costs hundreds of millions, is thriving, it doesn't necessarily mean that big, old-school strikers are back in vogue.
Ultimately, whether Semenyo will prove to be worth £65 million remains to be seen. The answer lies with Pep Guardiola's plans for the player, which have historically been spot on. However, valuations in the Premier League feel detached from any objective reality. Value is subjective, and fees are a reflection of that.
Semenyo, 25, has shown promise, but it will take time to establish himself as an excellent player for City. The key question is: was £65 million a fair price for his services? Only the market will tell.
In an era where big transfers are the norm, £65 million seems like a reasonable price tag for a player of Semenyo's abilities: quick, skilful, intelligent, and hardworking. He has four-and-a-half years left on his contract, which is standard in modern football. The market dictates value, and if City can afford it, that's all that matters.
But the question remains: was this transfer a bargain or a misfire? Pedants might point out that Semenyo costs nearly seven times as much as Nordi Mukiele, who signed for Sunderland from Paris Saint-Germain last summer. Supply and demand dictate prices, and if there's interest in Semenyo, the price goes up.
However, not everyone has had a successful stint as a big No 9 this season. Benjamin Sesko, the Slovenian striker who joined Newcastle United, is an anomaly. While he's shown flashes of brilliance, his overall performance has been underwhelming. It's worth noting that Sesko was signed in the same "striker bubble" as Semenyo and Hugo Ekitiké, with all three aiming to fill the role of a prolific goal-scorer.
It seems that old-school No 9s, like the Filippo Inzaghi-style forward, have become relics of the past. The game has changed, and with it, the way coaches approach recruitment. But just because Erling Haaland, the Norwegian striker who costs hundreds of millions, is thriving, it doesn't necessarily mean that big, old-school strikers are back in vogue.
Ultimately, whether Semenyo will prove to be worth £65 million remains to be seen. The answer lies with Pep Guardiola's plans for the player, which have historically been spot on. However, valuations in the Premier League feel detached from any objective reality. Value is subjective, and fees are a reflection of that.
Semenyo, 25, has shown promise, but it will take time to establish himself as an excellent player for City. The key question is: was £65 million a fair price for his services? Only the market will tell.