Royal Mail-owned courier faces tribunal over drivers' rights

Dozens of drivers for a Royal Mail-owned courier service are set to take their fight for workers' rights to an employment tribunal this year. The 46 drivers, who work around-the-clock making deliveries, including transporting vital blood and tissue samples to NHS hospitals, claim they have been wrongly classified as self-employed.

Their case alleges that the company's control over their work, including job allocation and expectations around availability and performance, is inconsistent with genuine self-employment. According to two of the drivers, who wished to remain anonymous, they are working long hours without guaranteed pay, often having to sit idle in their vans for hours waiting for jobs.

The drivers argue that this level of control should grant them worker status, entitling them to minimum wage and holiday pay. Their case is being supported by the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain, which has long campaigned against companies like eCourier that opt out of providing workers' rights.

Leigh Day, a law firm that successfully represented Uber drivers in a landmark supreme court case, is representing the eCourier drivers. Two years ago, the UK Supreme Court ruled that Uber drivers should be classified as workers rather than self-employed contractors.

Mandy Bhattal, an employment partner at Leigh Day, said that if the eCourier drivers are found to be workers, they will be able to claim holiday pay and national minimum wage after deductions. This could lead to improved working conditions for the drivers, who currently struggle to make ends meet under the current arrangements.

The case is a significant challenge to companies like eCourier, which continue to exploit their workforce by denying them basic rights such as fair pay and protections. As Alex Marshall, president of the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain, said, "This case highlights the government's failure to tackle the deep injustice that runs through the gig economy."
 
I'm getting frustrated with these courier services they're taking advantage of their drivers like this 🀯 They work all night making deliveries, it's not fair that they have to sit around waiting for jobs and don't get guaranteed pay. It's like they're being treated as just independent contractors but still living on the road 24/7. I think it's time someone held these companies accountable and gave their drivers some basic rights like a decent wage and paid holidays πŸ’ΈπŸ‘
 
man this is crazy stuff... i mean, who would've thought that just 'cause you own a company, doesn't mean u can treat people like dirt 🀯... these drivers are literally working non-stop, day in and out, no guarantee of pay, and they're expected to be on call 24/7? it's like being in a relationship but not having the freedom to leave or make your own decisions πŸš—πŸ’¨

and what really gets me is that these guys are fighting for the basics: minimum wage, holiday pay... stuff that every human being deserves. i mean, i get why they're mad - companies like eCourier take advantage of people who need a job and just exploit them πŸ’Έ... hope this tribunal case makes a change in the system 🀞
 
I'm sending so much love & support to these amazing drivers!!! πŸŒˆπŸ’– They're fighting for what's rightfully theirs - fair treatment & basic rights! I'm all about empowering people, especially those on the frontlines like our courier heroes. The fact that they're being controlled by their job and having to sit idle is just unacceptable πŸš«πŸ‘Ž. Two years ago we saw a major shift with Uber drivers getting worker status, now it's eCourier's turn! πŸ’ͺ I'm so proud of the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain for standing up for these workers & Leigh Day for taking on this case. If these drivers win, it'll be a huge win for all gig economy workers & we can start to see some real change πŸ’₯πŸ’•
 
🚚 I'm thinking, these drivers are basically working for Royal Mail, but they're not getting the same benefits as regular employees... it just doesn't add up πŸ€”. And I can totally see why they'd want to take their case to an employment tribunal - they've got a solid argument that they're being treated unfairly.

I'm curious, how many people are affected by this issue? It feels like a big problem, but if we don't know the scale of it, how can we even start to fix it? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ I also wonder, what's going on with companies like eCourier that just opt out of providing workers' rights in the first place? It's not right that they're profiting off their employees without giving them any protection.

I think this case could be a big deal for workers' rights in general. If these drivers are found to be workers, it could set a precedent for other gig economy companies... maybe we'll start to see some real changes πŸš€. But for now, I just hope that the tribunal makes a fair decision and that these drivers get the justice they deserve πŸ’Ό.
 
omg i no how 2 many ppl r doin ths same fight 4 yrs now & its about time they get da recognition dey deserve πŸ™„. eCourier drivers hv 2 work 2 hard w/o getting a decent wage, & its crazy dat dey gotta sit idle 4 hrs waiting 4 jobs. i think its high time dey take action & go 2 da employment tribunal 2 sort dis out. dey rnt just deliverin packages dey r keepin vital samples & dey deserve better pay n conditions πŸ’Έ. let's hope dey get da justice dey deserve & set a precedent 4 all da other gig economy workers 🀞
 
omg i'm so hyped for these drivers!!! they're fighting for what's rightfully theirs - fair pay and workers' rights 🀩. it's crazy that companies like eCourier can just take advantage of people like this without any consequences. two years ago we already saw the Uber case and now this is happening again, but i'm glad to see more drivers standing up for themselves πŸ’ͺ. leigh day is doing an amazing job representing these workers and i hope they win big time πŸ™Œ. this case could set a precedent for all gig economy workers everywhere and finally bring some justice to the industry πŸ’₯. let's get behind these drivers and show e courier that we won't stand for their exploitation 😑.
 
I'm still thinking about this UK court case from last year where Uber drivers were classified as workers πŸ€”. Now, this eCourier thing is kinda similar... they're claiming they're not self-employed 'cause of the control Royal Mail has over their work schedules and whatnot πŸ’Ό. I mean, can't you just sit there in the van waiting for a gig to show up if that's how it feels? 🚐. It seems like these drivers are really struggling to make ends meet too... I feel bad for them πŸ€—.

I'm wondering, will this case lead to more companies having to take responsibility for their workers' rights? Like, what's the deal with all these gig economy companies just skirting around the law and paying drivers peanuts πŸ’Έ. It's not right. The whole thing just feels a bit... unfair πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ.

Wait, I had an idea about this last week when I was scrolling through my feeds about another case involving Deliveroo riders πŸ‘€. Maybe we're seeing some bigger changes coming to the way workers are classified in the gig economy? πŸ€”
 
πŸššπŸ’Ό The way these eCourier drivers are being treated is wild 🀯. I mean, they're basically working 24/7 without any stability or security πŸ•’οΈ. It's like they're not even employees πŸ‘₯. If they do win this case, it'll be a major victory for workers' rights πŸ†. The fact that the UK Supreme Court ruled on Uber drivers being classified as workers is already paving the way πŸ’‘. But what's really concerning is that companies are still taking advantage of people in the gig economy 😬. I hope these eCourier drivers get the justice they deserve and can enjoy some decent pay and benefits πŸ’Έ. It's time for governments to step up and regulate this industry properly 🚫πŸ’ͺ
 
I'm not sure about these eCourier drivers getting recognition as workers... I mean, they are doing a crucial job delivering blood and tissue samples to hospitals πŸš‘. If they're classed as self-employed, it seems like a reasonable arrangement considering the flexibility they get in their work schedules.

But then again, if they're working long hours without guaranteed pay and having to sit around waiting for jobs, that doesn't sound right either πŸ€”. The thought of these drivers struggling to make ends meet is pretty worrying.

It's interesting to see companies like eCourier being challenged over this issue... it'll be good to see how the tribunal case unfolds πŸ‘€.
 
I'm literally livid about this 🀯! I mean, can you even imagine being a driver all day, every day, without any security or benefits? It's crazy that these guys are working non-stop making deliveries and transporting life-saving blood samples, only to be treated like they're not even employees. I get it, the gig economy is a big issue, but this is just ridiculous! We need better protections for workers like these drivers πŸššπŸ’Ό. If the court rules in their favor, it's a huge win for fair pay and holiday time - let's hope it sets a precedent for all these companies that are exploiting their workforce πŸ’ͺ🏽. This case needs to raise awareness about the struggles of gig economy workers, we need more change! πŸ“’
 
πŸ€” I'm all about fairness for these drivers πŸ™Œ. They're basically working 24/7 without any real control over their schedule or pay. It's crazy that they can just sit in their vans for hours and not get paid πŸ’Έ. If they are workers, they should at least be getting the minimum wage and some decent holiday time 🌞.

I'm curious about how this case will affect other gig economy workers 🀝. Are we going to see more companies like eCourier having to rethink their business models? πŸ€” And what about the government's role in all of this? Can't they just make sure everyone's treated fairly and paid properly πŸ’Έ?

I hope the drivers get justice and some real improvements for their working conditions πŸ˜’. It would be awesome if we saw more transparency and accountability from companies like eCourier πŸ‘€
 
πŸššπŸ’Ό I'm really glad these drivers are taking their fight to employment tribunal! They're literally working tirelessly making deliveries and transporting life-saving samples to NHS hospitals, but they're still being treated like self-employed contractors? That's just not fair πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. They deserve the same rights as anyone else in this country - minimum wage, holiday pay, and some decent working conditions too! πŸ‘ It's about time these companies like eCourier are held accountable for their actions. Two years ago we saw a landmark case with Uber drivers, so it's only fair that other gig economy workers get the same treatment 🚫πŸ’ͺ I'm all for supporting our workers' rights and fighting against exploitation, let's hope this tribunal case makes some real changes! πŸ’₯
 
omg, just heard about this eCourier drivers who are fightin for workers rights & it's SO unfair 🀯! i mean, they're workin non-stop, deliverin vitals to hospitals and still gettin paid like self-employed? no wayyyy πŸ’β€β™€οΈ. 2 yrs ago, uber got a supreme court win and now eCourier is doin the same thing, but our gov's gotta step up & give these drivers the rights they deserve 🚨. minimum wage, holiday pay, and better work conditions are NOT optional πŸ˜’. Leigh Day's got this case in the bag πŸ’ͺ, can't wait to see what happens next...
 
🀯 Interesting, companies like eCourier are getting away with exploiting their workers for years. I mean, it's crazy that drivers have to work long hours without guaranteed pay and still get classified as self-employed. It's not right 🚫. The UK Supreme Court already ruled that Uber drivers should be treated as workers, so why can't the same go for eCourier drivers? πŸ€”
 
It's absolutely appalling how companies like eCourier are taking advantage of their drivers' work ethic while denying them basic rights 😱. The fact that these drivers are working long hours without guaranteed pay and having to sit idle for hours is unacceptable. It's clear that they're being treated as little more than an extension of the company, which is a far cry from genuine self-employment πŸš—.

The UK Supreme Court's ruling in favor of Uber drivers was a significant step forward, but it's disappointing that companies like eCourier are continuing to flout the law and exploit their workers ⏰. The Independent Workers Union of Great Britain is doing some great work in fighting for these workers' rights, and I hope they succeed in their case 🀞.

It's also interesting to note how this case highlights the government's failure to address the root issues in the gig economy πŸ“Š. As Alex Marshall so aptly put it, this case showcases the injustice that many gig workers face, and I think it's high time for some real change πŸ’ͺ.
 
I'm so down for these drivers taking a stand! It's not right that they're being treated like self-employed contractors when they're literally working their arses off 24/7. I mean, can you imagine if your job required you to be on call all the time and didn't guarantee a pay packet? No one would put up with it!

It's crazy that these drivers are having to sit idle in their vans for hours just waiting for jobs. That's not fair at all! And to think they're missing out on holiday pay and minimum wage because of some dodgy classification by the company... it's just not right.

I'm loving that the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain is supporting these drivers, and Leigh Day is representing them in court. It's about time someone stood up for these workers and made companies like eCourier accountable for their treatment! πŸ‘Š
 
omg can you believe these guys are gettin' screwed over like this?! they're literally workin' 24/7 deliverin' life savin' blood and tissue samples and yet they're treated like nothin'? self-employment? come on! they got schedules to keep, vans to maintain, jobs to allocate... that's not self-employment, that's a 9-to-5 job with benefits 🀯

and can we talk about the UK Supreme Court ruling on Uber drivers for 2 secs?! now it's like "oh, if eCourier drivers are workers too, they should get holiday pay and min wage" fair play to Leigh Day for representin' 'em. but what's really sad is that these guys have been strugglin' makin' ends meet for ages πŸ€‘

anywayz, here's the thing: this case might just be a major shift in how companies like eCourier treat their workers. if they gotta pay min wage and holiday pay... that's gonna change the game πŸ”„
 
Umm... so like what just happened with the Royal Mail couriers? πŸ€” I dont really get why they gotta go to tribunal if they are self employed, cant they just sort out their own money and stuff? πŸ€‘ But wait, isnt it like, unfair if companies control how much they work and expect them to be available 24/7? πŸ•°οΈ Like my cousin works as a freelancer and she has to do lots of odd jobs, but she sets her own hours and stuff. Does that count as self employment too? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
I'm not sure if these eCourier drivers are being a bit unfair, I mean they do get to choose their own hours and all that... πŸ€” But at the same time, it is pretty dodgy that Royal Mail can just dictate who's available when and for how long. It's like, if you're running your own business, shouldn't you have some control over that? I guess what bothers me is that these guys are basically working non-stop without any guarantee of pay or benefits... that does sound exploitative.

The thing is, the law says Uber drivers should be classified as workers, so it's only fair that eCourier drivers get similar treatment. But at the same time, I can see why companies might not want to classify them as workers if it means having to give them more holiday pay and whatnot... πŸ€‘ It's all a bit of a mess, really.

I do think the government needs to sort out the gig economy and make sure these kinds of workers are treated fairly. But for now, I'm just not sure how this is going to play out...
 
Back
Top