Dozens of drivers for a Royal Mail-owned courier service are set to take their fight for workers' rights to an employment tribunal this year. The 46 drivers, who work around-the-clock making deliveries, including transporting vital blood and tissue samples to NHS hospitals, claim they have been wrongly classified as self-employed.
Their case alleges that the company's control over their work, including job allocation and expectations around availability and performance, is inconsistent with genuine self-employment. According to two of the drivers, who wished to remain anonymous, they are working long hours without guaranteed pay, often having to sit idle in their vans for hours waiting for jobs.
The drivers argue that this level of control should grant them worker status, entitling them to minimum wage and holiday pay. Their case is being supported by the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain, which has long campaigned against companies like eCourier that opt out of providing workers' rights.
Leigh Day, a law firm that successfully represented Uber drivers in a landmark supreme court case, is representing the eCourier drivers. Two years ago, the UK Supreme Court ruled that Uber drivers should be classified as workers rather than self-employed contractors.
Mandy Bhattal, an employment partner at Leigh Day, said that if the eCourier drivers are found to be workers, they will be able to claim holiday pay and national minimum wage after deductions. This could lead to improved working conditions for the drivers, who currently struggle to make ends meet under the current arrangements.
The case is a significant challenge to companies like eCourier, which continue to exploit their workforce by denying them basic rights such as fair pay and protections. As Alex Marshall, president of the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain, said, "This case highlights the government's failure to tackle the deep injustice that runs through the gig economy."
Their case alleges that the company's control over their work, including job allocation and expectations around availability and performance, is inconsistent with genuine self-employment. According to two of the drivers, who wished to remain anonymous, they are working long hours without guaranteed pay, often having to sit idle in their vans for hours waiting for jobs.
The drivers argue that this level of control should grant them worker status, entitling them to minimum wage and holiday pay. Their case is being supported by the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain, which has long campaigned against companies like eCourier that opt out of providing workers' rights.
Leigh Day, a law firm that successfully represented Uber drivers in a landmark supreme court case, is representing the eCourier drivers. Two years ago, the UK Supreme Court ruled that Uber drivers should be classified as workers rather than self-employed contractors.
Mandy Bhattal, an employment partner at Leigh Day, said that if the eCourier drivers are found to be workers, they will be able to claim holiday pay and national minimum wage after deductions. This could lead to improved working conditions for the drivers, who currently struggle to make ends meet under the current arrangements.
The case is a significant challenge to companies like eCourier, which continue to exploit their workforce by denying them basic rights such as fair pay and protections. As Alex Marshall, president of the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain, said, "This case highlights the government's failure to tackle the deep injustice that runs through the gig economy."