New York City Police Department's Racially Biased Vehicle Searches Exposed in Lawsuit
The New York City Police Department (NYPD) has been accused of conducting an unjustified surge in vehicle searches, disproportionately targeting Black and Latino drivers under Mayor Eric Adams' tenure. A new lawsuit claims that these searches are often based on racial profiling, with Black and Latino drivers making up 84% of the searches between 2022 and September 2025.
The lawsuit, filed by the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), the Bronx Defenders, and Milbank LLP, alleges that the NYPD's practice is a continuation of the discredited "stop-and-frisk" policy, which was famously challenged in court. The complaint argues that far too many Black and Latino drivers are treated like criminals when their vehicles are searched during routine traffic stops, solely because of the color of their skin.
According to the lawsuit, vehicle searches more than doubled under Mayor Adams, rising from 13,340 in 2022 to 28,416 in 2024. The NYPD sends more officers to areas with high crime rates and resident complaints, resulting in increased enforcement. However, the vast majority of these searches do not result in charges or arrests.
The lawsuit cites examples of Black New Yorkers whose vehicles were searched multiple times without any contraband found. In one case, a man named Christopher Oliver was searched four times in two years, despite not consenting to each search and no evidence being discovered.
Experts say that the disparities in vehicle searches persist across the city and are even higher in Black and Latino neighborhoods, even when controlling for crime rates. The complaint argues that these practices amount to racial profiling and demand an end to what it calls "stop-and-frisk on wheels."
In response to the lawsuit, NYPD officials claimed that increased enforcement is necessary to address rising crime rates. However, critics argue that such tactics are a continuation of systemic racism and violate civil rights.
This case raises concerns about police accountability and the need for meaningful reforms in policing practices. As Judge Shira A. Scheindlin once noted about stop-and-frisk, "it has not disappeared, it's simply shifted." The lawsuit demands an end to these racially biased practices and seeks justice for those affected by them.
The New York City Police Department (NYPD) has been accused of conducting an unjustified surge in vehicle searches, disproportionately targeting Black and Latino drivers under Mayor Eric Adams' tenure. A new lawsuit claims that these searches are often based on racial profiling, with Black and Latino drivers making up 84% of the searches between 2022 and September 2025.
The lawsuit, filed by the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), the Bronx Defenders, and Milbank LLP, alleges that the NYPD's practice is a continuation of the discredited "stop-and-frisk" policy, which was famously challenged in court. The complaint argues that far too many Black and Latino drivers are treated like criminals when their vehicles are searched during routine traffic stops, solely because of the color of their skin.
According to the lawsuit, vehicle searches more than doubled under Mayor Adams, rising from 13,340 in 2022 to 28,416 in 2024. The NYPD sends more officers to areas with high crime rates and resident complaints, resulting in increased enforcement. However, the vast majority of these searches do not result in charges or arrests.
The lawsuit cites examples of Black New Yorkers whose vehicles were searched multiple times without any contraband found. In one case, a man named Christopher Oliver was searched four times in two years, despite not consenting to each search and no evidence being discovered.
Experts say that the disparities in vehicle searches persist across the city and are even higher in Black and Latino neighborhoods, even when controlling for crime rates. The complaint argues that these practices amount to racial profiling and demand an end to what it calls "stop-and-frisk on wheels."
In response to the lawsuit, NYPD officials claimed that increased enforcement is necessary to address rising crime rates. However, critics argue that such tactics are a continuation of systemic racism and violate civil rights.
This case raises concerns about police accountability and the need for meaningful reforms in policing practices. As Judge Shira A. Scheindlin once noted about stop-and-frisk, "it has not disappeared, it's simply shifted." The lawsuit demands an end to these racially biased practices and seeks justice for those affected by them.