Tech firm’s new CTO gets indicted; company then claims he was never CTO

A top tech executive at Corvex, a company specializing in AI cloud computing, has been indicted for allegedly exporting Nvidia chips to China. The man in question is Brian Raymond, who was named as the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) of Corvex just days before his arrest. However, after being charged with conspiracy to illegally export Nvidia chips and other serious crimes, Corvex claimed that Raymond had never been the CTO of the company.

The indictment, unsealed last week, alleges that Raymond operated an Alabama-based electronics company through which he supplied Nvidia GPUs to his alleged conspirators for illegal export to China. The US Justice Department said Raymond's actions were part of a broader conspiracy involving multiple individuals and companies.

In a press release announcing its merger with Movano Health, Corvex named Raymond as the CTO and stated that he would continue in that role after the merger. But when questioned by reporters about the charges against Raymond, Corvex claimed he was never an employee or CTO of the company.

Law professors say that someone can legally be an officer of a company without being an employee. However, even if interpreting Corvex's statements as charitable, they are "splitting hairs" and misleading investors with their claims about Raymond's status.

The merger agreement between Corvex and Movano Health lists Raymond as one of three post-closing officers, which suggests he was indeed the CTO at some point.

Experts say that false statements like these could lead to private litigation or SEC charges if they were not made in good faith. If Raymond really wasn't the CTO, it would be a material misstatement given the nature of the company and could spark SEC enforcement or private lawsuits from shareholders.
 
🤔 just thinkin' about this whole thing, its crazy how fast companies can change leadership and suddenly their past actions don't add up anymore... all these questions around Brian Raymond's role at Corvex and whether he was ever really the CTO... sounds like a mess to me 😬
 
😒 this is some crazy stuff going down at Corvex. I mean, you gotta wonder how they thought trying to spin this one would fly under the radar... Raymond's alleged actions are a huge deal, especially if they were part of a larger conspiracy. And let's be real, who tries to claim someone was never an employee when they're listed as one in the merger agreement? 🤦‍♂️ it just reeks of trying to cover your tracks. I'm surprised no one is calling for some accountability from Corvex and its lawyers. This whole thing smells like a fishy business deal gone sour...
 
🤦‍♂️ I'm literally shaking my head over this one... like, how do you just go ahead and change your entire corporate history overnight? And then have the nerve to claim that one guy was never even a part of the company?! 🙄 The merger documents are clear, he was listed as CTO before everything went down. It's not even like they're trying to spin a narrative or something, it's just straight-up denying reality. 😒 This whole thing reeks of corporate shenanigans and I'm surprised no one is holding them accountable for making those false statements... especially with the SEC involved 🚨💸
 
🙄 I think Corvex is totally fine here. They're just trying to protect their investors by not committing to any info that might get them in trouble later on. If Raymond was never actually the CTO, then they didn't have a reason to make false claims about it. And honestly, some law professors are being super pedantic about this - like who really cares if someone is an officer of a company or not? The fact is, Corvex is saying what they think and that's good enough for me 🤷‍♂️
 
I'm kinda surprised that Corvex is denying Brian Raymond's involvement with the company, considering they were all like "he's our new CTO" just days before he got busted 🤔. I mean, if someone's listed as a post-closing officer in their merger deal, that's pretty damning evidence against them... or is it? 😳 Maybe Corvex was just being super cautious and didn't want to mention his "previous" role until the heat died down 💁‍♂️. But at the same time, I feel like they're kinda dodging the question and splitting hairs about what it means to be an officer vs employee... or are they? 🤷‍♂️
 
Ugh poor guy Brian Raymond 🤕, seems like he's caught up in something huge and now his future is all messed up 😟... I can imagine how stressful this must be for him and his loved ones 😔. It's crazy that Corvex was trying to distance themselves from him so fast after getting charged with some serious crimes 🚨. And it's not just about the law, but also about the trust that investors had in them and now they're basically saying their statements were a total lie 🙅‍♂️. Hope he gets a good lawyer and can get through this 💪
 
🤔 This whole thing is giving me some serious trust issues with Corvex's PR team! I mean, if they say Brian Raymond was never their CTO when they've got a merger agreement that lists him as one of the post-closing officers... 📝 That's like saying you're not responsible for your own car repairs because you don't want to pay the insurance premiums. It just doesn't add up! 💸 And what about all those law professors who are trying to give Corvex some leeway? Like, I get it, maybe Raymond wasn't an employee, but still... 🤷‍♂️ False statements like this can hurt investors and damage a company's reputation. SEC charges aren't out of the question, and if Raymond was indeed the CTO, then what's going on with all that deleted email history? 💻
 
Back
Top