The $500 billion global beauty industry has long been criticized for its lack of sustainability, with many brands failing to meet even basic environmental standards. While some companies claim to be committed to reducing their plastic usage and increasing transparency around ingredients, a closer look reveals that the industry's efforts are often piecemeal at best.
According to recent research, 60% of consumers worldwide consider sustainability an important factor when making purchasing decisions, with many willing to pay more for products and services that are environmentally friendly. This shift in consumer preferences has prompted beauty brands to set environmental goals, such as moving away from single-use plastics and providing recyclable, reusable, or refillable packaging.
However, despite these efforts, consumers often struggle to understand the sustainability credentials of many products. The industry's clean-up efforts have been inconsistent, and without collective goal-setting, global strategy, and standardized regulations, it's difficult for customers to trust that a product is truly green.
One major challenge facing the industry is ingredient transparency. There is no international standard for how much product ingredient information should be shared with customers, leading to confusion and "greenwashing" – where sustainability claims are made but not substantiated. This lack of transparency can also lead to marketing language like "clean beauty," which may make a product seem natural or sustainable when it's not.
Some experts argue that the term "clean beauty" has become "dangerous" as brands use it to sell more products, and that customers need better marketing information and certification standards. The British Beauty Council has called on the industry to have "the courage to change" its business practices, including moving away from over-consumption of natural ingredients and adopting non-regenerative farming practices.
The plastic packaging challenge is a significant sustainability issue in the beauty industry. 95% of packaging is thrown away, and most of it is not recycled. Beauty giant L'Oreal uses 144,430 metric tons of plastic in its packaging material, while Estee Lauder Companies reports producing 71,600 metric tons of plastic.
Only 9% of global plastic waste is recycled, and the US only recycles 4% of its plastic waste. Many brands are trying to phase out harmful plastics from their operations and adopt post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic, but demand for PCR plastic is high and prices are often higher than virgin plastic.
Beauty retailers also play a pivotal role in setting sustainability standards, but many vary when it comes to the standards they set for brands they sell. Some, like Sephora, have launched initiatives such as "Clean + Planet Positive" that label products meeting certain criteria. However, many steps taken by brands and retailers do not address the waste and pollution generated throughout supply chains, manufacturing, and shipping.
The gaps in standardization in the beauty ecosystem can be partially filled by certifications like B Corp, but these are currently voluntary for brands to apply for. Governments and multinationals enforcing regulations and setting a baseline for brands to operate from would go a long way in making change, many experts believe.
As Mia Davis, vice president of sustainability and impact at Credo Beauty, notes, "Regulation can raise the floor, but that's never going to be what the market can do." Market leadership is key, and it will take continued collective advocacy and initiative to see meaningful climate-conscious change.
According to recent research, 60% of consumers worldwide consider sustainability an important factor when making purchasing decisions, with many willing to pay more for products and services that are environmentally friendly. This shift in consumer preferences has prompted beauty brands to set environmental goals, such as moving away from single-use plastics and providing recyclable, reusable, or refillable packaging.
However, despite these efforts, consumers often struggle to understand the sustainability credentials of many products. The industry's clean-up efforts have been inconsistent, and without collective goal-setting, global strategy, and standardized regulations, it's difficult for customers to trust that a product is truly green.
One major challenge facing the industry is ingredient transparency. There is no international standard for how much product ingredient information should be shared with customers, leading to confusion and "greenwashing" – where sustainability claims are made but not substantiated. This lack of transparency can also lead to marketing language like "clean beauty," which may make a product seem natural or sustainable when it's not.
Some experts argue that the term "clean beauty" has become "dangerous" as brands use it to sell more products, and that customers need better marketing information and certification standards. The British Beauty Council has called on the industry to have "the courage to change" its business practices, including moving away from over-consumption of natural ingredients and adopting non-regenerative farming practices.
The plastic packaging challenge is a significant sustainability issue in the beauty industry. 95% of packaging is thrown away, and most of it is not recycled. Beauty giant L'Oreal uses 144,430 metric tons of plastic in its packaging material, while Estee Lauder Companies reports producing 71,600 metric tons of plastic.
Only 9% of global plastic waste is recycled, and the US only recycles 4% of its plastic waste. Many brands are trying to phase out harmful plastics from their operations and adopt post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic, but demand for PCR plastic is high and prices are often higher than virgin plastic.
Beauty retailers also play a pivotal role in setting sustainability standards, but many vary when it comes to the standards they set for brands they sell. Some, like Sephora, have launched initiatives such as "Clean + Planet Positive" that label products meeting certain criteria. However, many steps taken by brands and retailers do not address the waste and pollution generated throughout supply chains, manufacturing, and shipping.
The gaps in standardization in the beauty ecosystem can be partially filled by certifications like B Corp, but these are currently voluntary for brands to apply for. Governments and multinationals enforcing regulations and setting a baseline for brands to operate from would go a long way in making change, many experts believe.
As Mia Davis, vice president of sustainability and impact at Credo Beauty, notes, "Regulation can raise the floor, but that's never going to be what the market can do." Market leadership is key, and it will take continued collective advocacy and initiative to see meaningful climate-conscious change.