The world's $500 billion beauty industry has set ambitious targets to reduce its environmental footprint, but a patchwork of efforts is falling short of making a significant impact.
Many consumers are increasingly demanding sustainable products, with 60% of people worldwide rating sustainability as an important purchase criterion. As a result, beauty brands have been setting goals to move away from single-use plastics, provide recyclable packaging, and offer more transparency around product ingredients.
However, despite the industry's efforts, many consumers struggle to understand the sustainability credentials of products due to inconsistent labeling and lack of standardization. The British Beauty Council has reported that even natural ingredients can be problematic if they are sourced unsustainably or processed in ways that contribute to pollution.
One major challenge is plastic packaging, which accounts for 95% of waste generated by the industry. Yet, recycling rates remain low, with only 9% of global plastic waste being recycled globally and just 4% in the US.
Many brands are trying to phase out single-use plastics and adopt post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic, but the cost and availability of PCR are major hurdles. Even smaller businesses that have made a commitment to sustainability often struggle with supply chain complexities and inconsistent regulations across countries.
Certifications like B Corp can provide some standardization, but they remain voluntary for brands. Governments and multinationals enforcing regulations would be more effective in driving change, according to many experts.
Ultimately, it is the market leadership that drives sustainability efforts forward. As consumers increasingly demand greener products, brands are responding with initiatives such as clean beauty programs and transparency about product ingredients.
However, the industry's lack of collective goal-setting and global strategy means that progress is slow and patchy. The pursuit of bold regulations or global standards on sustainability practices remains a necessary step to drive meaningful change in the beauty industry's climate shortcomings.
Many consumers are increasingly demanding sustainable products, with 60% of people worldwide rating sustainability as an important purchase criterion. As a result, beauty brands have been setting goals to move away from single-use plastics, provide recyclable packaging, and offer more transparency around product ingredients.
However, despite the industry's efforts, many consumers struggle to understand the sustainability credentials of products due to inconsistent labeling and lack of standardization. The British Beauty Council has reported that even natural ingredients can be problematic if they are sourced unsustainably or processed in ways that contribute to pollution.
One major challenge is plastic packaging, which accounts for 95% of waste generated by the industry. Yet, recycling rates remain low, with only 9% of global plastic waste being recycled globally and just 4% in the US.
Many brands are trying to phase out single-use plastics and adopt post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic, but the cost and availability of PCR are major hurdles. Even smaller businesses that have made a commitment to sustainability often struggle with supply chain complexities and inconsistent regulations across countries.
Certifications like B Corp can provide some standardization, but they remain voluntary for brands. Governments and multinationals enforcing regulations would be more effective in driving change, according to many experts.
Ultimately, it is the market leadership that drives sustainability efforts forward. As consumers increasingly demand greener products, brands are responding with initiatives such as clean beauty programs and transparency about product ingredients.
However, the industry's lack of collective goal-setting and global strategy means that progress is slow and patchy. The pursuit of bold regulations or global standards on sustainability practices remains a necessary step to drive meaningful change in the beauty industry's climate shortcomings.