Starmer's faction takes the "high road" in blocking Burnham, but it's just another sign of their ruthless desire for control.
It appears that Keir Starmer's inner circle sees Andy Burnham as a potential threat to their grip on the party. They block his attempt to stand in the upcoming Gorton and Denton byelection, citing the risk of Labour losing Greater Manchester to Reform UK. However, this move is more about maintaining their own power than protecting the party.
In reality, Starmer's faction would rather see Labour lose its core heartlands like Manchester than allow it to evolve into a more progressive force. This reflects their true priorities: maintaining their hold on the party and ensuring that their right-wing agenda prevails.
The decision to block Burnham is driven by a desire for self-preservation, not a genuine concern for the party's future. Starmer's faction knows that if Labour were to lose its traditional stronghold in Manchester, it would be a devastating blow to their credibility as a national force.
However, this move also highlights the fundamental problem with Starmer's leadership: his adherence to a right-wing agenda that has alienated many of Labour's core supporters. His faction is more concerned with defending their own power than addressing the party's underlying issues.
By blocking Burnham, Starmer's faction effectively sets up Wes Streeting as their next puppet leader. While he may have won some plaudits from commentators, his popularity with voters remains low. In fact, Labour is terrified of losing to the Greens in Gorton and Denton, which suggests that their strategy is doomed to fail.
The real question is: what exactly do Starmer's faction want? Their answer is clear: they crave power at any cost, even if it means sacrificing the party's integrity and credibility. This toxic politics consists of positioning themselves against the left and fighting for control, rather than genuinely seeking to serve the public interest.
As the situation in Gorton and Denton unfolds, the Greens must hammer home a crucial message: that Labour's current direction is unsustainable and that their own platform offers a genuine alternative. With Suella Braverman's defection to Reform, it's clear that voters are looking for something different. Let Labour burn – its soulless hacks have earned that fate.
It appears that Keir Starmer's inner circle sees Andy Burnham as a potential threat to their grip on the party. They block his attempt to stand in the upcoming Gorton and Denton byelection, citing the risk of Labour losing Greater Manchester to Reform UK. However, this move is more about maintaining their own power than protecting the party.
In reality, Starmer's faction would rather see Labour lose its core heartlands like Manchester than allow it to evolve into a more progressive force. This reflects their true priorities: maintaining their hold on the party and ensuring that their right-wing agenda prevails.
The decision to block Burnham is driven by a desire for self-preservation, not a genuine concern for the party's future. Starmer's faction knows that if Labour were to lose its traditional stronghold in Manchester, it would be a devastating blow to their credibility as a national force.
However, this move also highlights the fundamental problem with Starmer's leadership: his adherence to a right-wing agenda that has alienated many of Labour's core supporters. His faction is more concerned with defending their own power than addressing the party's underlying issues.
By blocking Burnham, Starmer's faction effectively sets up Wes Streeting as their next puppet leader. While he may have won some plaudits from commentators, his popularity with voters remains low. In fact, Labour is terrified of losing to the Greens in Gorton and Denton, which suggests that their strategy is doomed to fail.
The real question is: what exactly do Starmer's faction want? Their answer is clear: they crave power at any cost, even if it means sacrificing the party's integrity and credibility. This toxic politics consists of positioning themselves against the left and fighting for control, rather than genuinely seeking to serve the public interest.
As the situation in Gorton and Denton unfolds, the Greens must hammer home a crucial message: that Labour's current direction is unsustainable and that their own platform offers a genuine alternative. With Suella Braverman's defection to Reform, it's clear that voters are looking for something different. Let Labour burn – its soulless hacks have earned that fate.
they're more worried about losing power than saving the party from total collapse 
this decision to block burnham just shows how scared they are of labour evolving into a more progressive force 
and honestly who can blame them? their right-wing agenda is super outdated and it's only a matter of time before it backfires on them 
i mean, starmer's faction might be trying to control labor but honestly can't they focus on something more interesting than politics for once? like did you know that the owner of that pizza joint is actually a big fan of art house cinema? i met him at a film fest last month and he told me all about his latest venture... anyway, back to starmer's faction... sounds like they're just trying to cling to power 
The way Starmer's faction is playing politics is really shady 
. They're so worried about losing control of the party that they'd rather see Labour lose in Manchester than let it evolve into a more progressive force. It's like they're trying to preserve their grip on power at all costs 
, even if it means sacrificing the party's integrity and credibility.
- keeping his right-wing agenda in check and maintaining their hold on the party. But what they're not considering is that this approach will alienate even more Labour supporters 
, leaving them with no choice but to look elsewhere for alternatives.
. He may have won some praise from commentators, but his popularity with voters is still lacking. The Greens need to capitalize on this and remind people that Labour's current direction isn't sustainable 
!
This is just another example of Starmer's faction playing the victim while crushing anyone who dares to challenge them. They're so focused on maintaining their grip on power that they're willing to sacrifice the party's integrity and credibility for it. It's like they think they can just shut down opposition without facing any consequences. Newsflash: that's not how politics works. The Greens are the only ones trying to offer a genuine alternative, but I doubt they'll get much traction since the whole system is rigged against them 
.
. It seems like Keir Starmer's inner circle is more concerned with holding onto power than actually helping the party grow and connect with its core supporters. This move to block Andy Burnham from standing in the byelection is just another example of their desire for control at any cost 
.
. And by blocking Burnham, they're essentially setting up Wes Streeting as their next puppet leader - not exactly the kind of leadership we need in these times of crisis 
.
. The Greens are the ones who can offer a genuine alternative - they should be the ones to capitalize on this momentum 
. It shows their true colors: ruthless ambition over genuine party loyalty 
. Labour needs to wake up and realize that Starmer's right-wing agenda is alienating the very people they're supposed to represent 
.
. Starmer's faction needs to get their priorities straight and start listening to the people, not just their own power struggles 
.
. Otherwise, they'll keep getting left behind 
meanwhile, the Greens are like "yeah, we'll take your soulless hacks thanks" 
seriously though, this move is a huge mistake for Labour - it's like they're playing right into the Reform UK's hands. what's next? Trying to ban the Labour Party from being formed altogether? 
.
.
I'm not sure if he's got the charisma or the skills to lead Labour out of this mess. It's like they're setting themselves up for failure. The Greens need to capitalize on this and show voters that there's a better alternative... maybe it's time for a change in leadership? 
! they're more worried about maintaining their grip on power than actually helping the party 
. blocking burnham is a huge mistake 
it's like they're trying to alienate even more voters 
. labour needs to get back to its roots and become a progressive force again 
. wes streeting might be puppet material 
but he's not exactly the people's champ 
. let's hope the greens can capitalize on this and offer a real alternative 
.
.
. Their move on Andy Burnham is like, so transparently about maintaining control over the party 
. Like, who needs a genuine attempt to connect with voters when you can silence your own MPs and risk losing the very areas that made Labour relevant in the first place? 
.