The Guardian view on leasehold reform: Labour must stand up to property investors | Editorial

Labour Must Stand Up to Property Investors in Leasehold Reform.

The recent announcement by the Labour government on leasehold reform is a step in the right direction, but it falls short of what's needed to address the injustices faced by millions of leaseholders. The government has agreed to ban new leasehold flats and impose a cap on ground rents, but critics argue that these measures are insufficient.

The root cause of the problem lies with freehold investors who are reaping huge profits from the annual fees paid by leaseholders. These fees are separate from service charges that pay for maintenance, yet leaseholders receive nothing in return. The Competition and Markets Authority has found no evidence to suggest that leaseholders benefit from these payments, highlighting the clear-cut case for reform.

The government's announcement is welcome, but it fails to provide a comprehensive solution. The proposed ban on new leasehold flats is too little, too late, and existing leases will take 40 years to be phased out in favour of nominal "peppercorn rent". This is an unacceptable delay and must be addressed immediately.

Moreover, the government's decision to cap ground rents at Β£250 per annum is insufficient. Many leaseholders are facing far higher fees, which make it impossible for them to remortgage or sell their properties. The government must do more to address this issue.

One outstanding concern is the lack of transparency in freehold prices and valuations. Landowners have used inflated valuations based on hypothetical development values, which must be rejected by the government.

The Labour government must now take bold action to reform leasehold laws. This requires a willingness to stand up to property investors who are exploiting vulnerable leaseholders. The government must also provide clarity on issues such as building management and freehold prices.

Ultimately, this is not just about principle but also politics. Voters have been promised improvements in living standards, and the Labour government cannot afford to disappoint them. It's time for Labour to show courage and take decisive action to address the injustices faced by millions of leaseholders.
 
I'm so frustrated with the latest leasehold reform announcement 🀯... I mean, it's a start, but it feels like they're just scratching the surface. These property investors are taking advantage of people left and right, and it's just not fair πŸ’Έ. They're making out huge profits from these annual fees, while leaseholders are stuck paying without getting anything in return πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. The Β£250 cap on ground rents is a good start, but it feels like it should be more πŸ’ͺ. And what about all those freehold investors who are using inflated valuations? It's just not right πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. I think Labour needs to step up their game and show some real courage when it comes to taking on these powerful property investors πŸ’₯. They need to provide clarity and transparency, and get a handle on building management too 🏠... it's time for some serious reform! πŸ‘Š
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this leasehold reform announcement πŸ€”. I mean, it's a step in the right direction, but Β£250 per annum cap on ground rents? That's pretty meagre considering some leaseholders are paying up to 4 times that amount πŸ’Έ. And what about those who can't remortgage or sell due to these exorbitant fees? It's just not fair πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ.

I also think the government is being a bit coy on freehold prices and valuations πŸ“. We need transparency, not more bureaucratic red tape. And 40 years for existing leases to be phased out? That's an eternity! 😬

What I do love about this announcement though is that it acknowledges the issue and takes some action πŸ™Œ. But we need to push Labour to take bold action and really stand up to property investors who are taking advantage of vulnerable leaseholders πŸ’ͺ.
 
I gotta respectfully disagree πŸ˜’ - the government is being too aggressive in their reform. I mean, a complete ban on new leasehold flats is way too radical. What about the existing leases that are already stuck with huge ground rents? That's gonna be a nightmare to untangle. And Β£250 per annum cap is actually quite reasonable, imo πŸ‘ - it's a start at least. The real issue here is transparency and accountability from freehold investors, not the government's policies. If they just get their act together and stop passing the buck, we can have a proper conversation about reform πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
πŸ€” u know what's wild? I was just thinking about this the other day... have you ever tried to get a good cuppa coffee in london? like, it's all fine until you realize they're charging Β£5 for a cup that's literally 1/4 of a standard cup... meanwhile freehold investors are making bank off leaseholders who cant even afford to sell their own homes πŸ πŸ’Έ anyway back to leasehold reform... I think the govt should really crack down on those dodgy freehold prices πŸ‘€
 
πŸ€” this whole leasehold reform thing is such a mess, right? i mean, Β£250 per annum cap on ground rents sounds like a good start but it's still woefully inadequate considering what leaseholders are being asked to pay. and don't even get me started on the lack of transparency around freehold prices - it's like they're playing some kind of complex game with land values. i'm all for Labour taking bold action, though! πŸš€ we need a comprehensive solution that addresses the root cause of the problem, not just some tokenistic gestures. and can we please get a timeline on when these changes will actually happen? 40 years is way too long to wait for leaseholders who are struggling every day. πŸ’Έ
 
πŸ€” I think they're being a bit harsh on the gov't though - 250 quid is still way better than some of those leasehold fees I've seen πŸ€‘... but at the same time, I get what they're saying about freehold investors making a killing off these poor folks 😑. And 40 years to phase out leases? That's ages! I reckon Labour should be more concrete with their plan πŸ“. What really gets me is that landowners are just inflating valuations for kicks - it's not right πŸ‘Š. The gov't needs to stand up to those property investors and make some real changes πŸ’ͺ.
 
I mean, 40 years is a pretty long time to be paying extortionate fees just so you can maybe, potentially, sell your flat without losing a fortune πŸ€‘πŸ . And Β£250 a year for ground rent? That's like saying Β£2 a week on a Β£500k property πŸ˜‚. The government needs to step up their game and provide some real solutions, not just tokenistic gestures. And what about all the leaseholders who are already struggling to afford their mortgages? It's time for Labour to show some backbone and take on those freehold investors who are raking it in πŸ™„πŸ’Έ
 
idk why govntn't doing more on this leasehold reform πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ they r saying one thing but it seems like they r just tryna pacify the public n get re-elected. i mean Β£250 per annum cap on ground rents? come on that's still way too low if u ask me. and whats with 40 yrs before existing leases are phased out? that sounds like a total joke to me 🀣. what we need is some real change, not just tokenistic gestures. the govntn't needs to take a stand against property investors who r makin' all these leaseholders miserable πŸ˜’
 
um so they're trying to fix the whole leasehold thing... i mean i feel bad for people who have to pay all that extra money to property investors 🀯 like why can't they just get a cut or something? and 40 years is kinda long, you know? my mom has to pay her car insurance every year and it's not even that much... anyway i heard that some people are saying the gov's announcement isn't good enough... do u think they should've done more? πŸ€”
 
πŸ€” The real test for Labour is not just about passing a tokenistic reform but actually making meaningful change πŸ“ˆ Their proposed ban on new leasehold flats might seem like a victory, but I think Β£250 cap on ground rents is way off πŸ€‘ I mean, come on! Most leaseholders are paying double that amount or more. How about a real numbers game? A fixed payment of 2-3% of the property's value each year would be a good start πŸ’Έ And transparency? Are we talking about 'transparency' here? We need concrete details, not just vague promises πŸ“
 
I'm so done with these freehold investors 🀯! They're literally sucking the life out of people who just wanna live in their homes without being milked for every penny. Β£250 per annum is a joke, I've seen fees that are 5x higher than that and it's like they're laughing all the way to the bank πŸ’Έ. And don't even get me started on building management - who do these investors think they are? πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ A comprehensive solution is long overdue, this cap and ban deal just doesn't cut it for me 🚫. The government needs to step up and take control of these issues, no more passing the buck πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. Transparency in freehold prices is key, time for them to come clean about their inflated valuations πŸ’‘. Labour's got a chance to make things right, let's hope they take it πŸ‘
 
πŸš¨πŸ’Έ I'm loving the fact that Labour is finally taking on property investors who are making a killing off vulnerable leaseholders! 🀯 The Β£250 cap on ground rents sounds like a good start, but let's be real, it's still not enough πŸ’Έ. What about giving leaseholders more control over their own homes? Maybe allowing them to buy back freeholds at a fair price? 🏠 That would make me very happy 😊! And can we please get some transparency around freehold prices and valuations? This stuff is just too dodgy πŸ€”. The government needs to show some backbone here, stand up to the big property players and fight for leaseholders' rights πŸ”₯. Time to take action, not just promise change πŸ”„!
 
πŸ€” I think the govt is making progress on this but still gotta do more! What's up with the 40 yr delay tho? Can't just slap a cap on ground rents & expect everything to be ok... That's not solving anything for the actual people struggling 😩. And transparency on freehold prices would make such a big diff... Landowners r exploiting ppl & it's time they're held accountable 🚫
 
the fact that these measures are insufficient is a major letdown πŸ€”. 40 years to phase out leases is crazy, what about those who can't wait that long? ⏰. Β£250 cap on ground rents is also super low considering the fees some people are paying. and transparency with freehold prices is literally the bare minimum needed here πŸ’―.
 
Back
Top