The United States is now openly abandoning its long-standing playbook of propaganda and manipulation to justify regime change in Venezuela. Instead, it's relying on sheer militarization and intimidation to cow the Venezuelan government.
As American warships gather off the coast of Venezuela, a US Marine Sikorsky CH-53K King Stallion helicopter flew above Puerto Rico, near where another drone strike took out an alleged drug boat just days earlier. It is estimated that over 4,500 Marines and sailors are stationed outside of Venezuelan waters.
Critics argue that the Trump administration's use of the "War on Drugs" as a pretext to target Venezuela has become increasingly absurd. In September, US military forces began striking alleged "drug boats" in the Caribbean under the guise of combating narcotics trafficking.
In October, Trinidadian airwaves issued an unusual warning to fishermen after a U.S. Navy airstrike killed two fishermen off the coast of Venezuela. The strike was carried out under the guise of targeting narcotics traffickers affiliated with a designated terrorist organization.
However, Maduro's name and accusations that he is a drug kingpin have been used by the Department of Justice as a pretext for a $50 million bounty on his head. News outlets covering this story have barely registered the threat posed by the growing military presence in the region.
Critics argue that the narrative surrounding Venezuela has been set in stone, demonizing the country and its leader as a menace to American interests. Maduro has been branded a terrorist retroactively, with connections drawn between Venezuelan state officials and alleged cartel operatives.
This escalating militarization of the region has raised concerns about a potential invasion of Venezuela, which would be catastrophic for the country's population. Estimates suggest that up to 200,000 US troops would be required to maintain order, while the terrain would pose significant challenges for soldiers.
The author argues that this situation is eerily reminiscent of the lead-up to the Iraq War, where the media and government were eager to justify an intervention based on dubious intelligence and misinformation. The Trump administration's disregard for justification or consequences has led critics to describe a full-blown authoritarian takeover of the US government.
In reality, the Trump administration's actions have undermined press freedom, with news outlets that challenge him facing banishment or investigation. The Intercept, however, continues to cover this story, highlighting the need for independent journalism in defending democracy against such threats.
In short, the United States is now openly waging a war of attrition and intimidation in Venezuela, relying on its military might to cow its opposition. Critics urge readers to remain vigilant and support independent media in their efforts to hold those in power accountable.
As American warships gather off the coast of Venezuela, a US Marine Sikorsky CH-53K King Stallion helicopter flew above Puerto Rico, near where another drone strike took out an alleged drug boat just days earlier. It is estimated that over 4,500 Marines and sailors are stationed outside of Venezuelan waters.
Critics argue that the Trump administration's use of the "War on Drugs" as a pretext to target Venezuela has become increasingly absurd. In September, US military forces began striking alleged "drug boats" in the Caribbean under the guise of combating narcotics trafficking.
In October, Trinidadian airwaves issued an unusual warning to fishermen after a U.S. Navy airstrike killed two fishermen off the coast of Venezuela. The strike was carried out under the guise of targeting narcotics traffickers affiliated with a designated terrorist organization.
However, Maduro's name and accusations that he is a drug kingpin have been used by the Department of Justice as a pretext for a $50 million bounty on his head. News outlets covering this story have barely registered the threat posed by the growing military presence in the region.
Critics argue that the narrative surrounding Venezuela has been set in stone, demonizing the country and its leader as a menace to American interests. Maduro has been branded a terrorist retroactively, with connections drawn between Venezuelan state officials and alleged cartel operatives.
This escalating militarization of the region has raised concerns about a potential invasion of Venezuela, which would be catastrophic for the country's population. Estimates suggest that up to 200,000 US troops would be required to maintain order, while the terrain would pose significant challenges for soldiers.
The author argues that this situation is eerily reminiscent of the lead-up to the Iraq War, where the media and government were eager to justify an intervention based on dubious intelligence and misinformation. The Trump administration's disregard for justification or consequences has led critics to describe a full-blown authoritarian takeover of the US government.
In reality, the Trump administration's actions have undermined press freedom, with news outlets that challenge him facing banishment or investigation. The Intercept, however, continues to cover this story, highlighting the need for independent journalism in defending democracy against such threats.
In short, the United States is now openly waging a war of attrition and intimidation in Venezuela, relying on its military might to cow its opposition. Critics urge readers to remain vigilant and support independent media in their efforts to hold those in power accountable.