"These people know what they're doing": White House launches "media offender" list

White House Unveils "Media Offender" List, Targeting Outlets that Criticize Trump

The White House has launched a new initiative to combat negative press coverage of President Donald Trump, featuring an inaugural list of news outlets deemed "media offenders." The site claims several major publications shared malicious stories about the president, including CBS News, The Independent, and The Boston Globe.

According to the White House, these outlets misrepresented Trump's reaction to Democratic lawmakers' warnings to military servicemembers, implying that the president issued illegal orders. However, the administration insists that every order Trump has given was lawful, and it is "dangerous" for lawmakers to incite insubordination in the US military.

The site includes a video with a red stamp reading "seditious" over the congresspeople involved, as well as a voiceover stating, "the president has never given an illegal order. These people know what they're doing." This is part of Trump's ongoing assault on press freedoms, which began during his first term and has intensified in his second.

The administration has used lawsuits against television networks that criticize him, booted legacy outlets from the White House press pool, and restricted access to certain parts of the White House. The new "Media Offender" list aims to silence further criticism by labeling these outlets as malicious. Critics argue this is a thinly veiled attempt to curtail dissenting voices and maintain a pro-Trump narrative.

By releasing this list, the White House is signaling its determination to police press coverage and control the narrative around Trump's presidency. The move raises concerns about the erosion of press freedoms and the potential for self-censorship among journalists.
 
OMG, can't believe what's goin' on 🀯! Did you see the new "Media Offender" list from the White House? They're basically labelin' outlets that criticize Trump as malicious πŸ˜’. Like, what's next? The FBI bein' called out for investigatein' Trump 🚨?

According to the White House, CBS News and The Boston Globe shared some shady stories about Trump πŸ“°. But honestly, it sounds like they're just tryin' to spin this whole thing πŸ”„. I mean, if every order Trump gave was lawful, then why do we need a list? It's like, dude, you're the President, act like one πŸ’β€β™‚οΈ.

I saw some stats from 2023 that show Trump's approval ratings have been steadily droppin' since 2017 πŸ“Š. Like, what's behind that decline? Is it because of all these controversies and lawsuits? It's def a red flag ⚠️.

And can we talk about the video they put on this list with the red stamp sayin' "seditious"? Like, come on πŸ™„. That's some McCarthy-esque vibes πŸ”₯. The First Amendment is in place for a reason, folks 🀝.

Here's a chart showin' the number of journalists arrested or harassed by Trump's administration since 2017 πŸ“ˆ:
🚨 2023: 34 arrests
πŸ”΄ 2022: 27 arrests
πŸ“Š 2021: 41 arrests

This is gettin' outta hand, fam πŸ‘€. Time to keep an eye on this situation and see where it goes πŸ•°οΈ.
 
OMG, what's going on 🀯?! The White House just launched this "Media Offender" list and it's like, totally shady πŸ™„. I mean, who decides which outlets are "media offenders"? It sounds like they're just picking on the ones that don't agree with them πŸ˜’. And what's up with the seditious stamp? That's straight out of a bad movie script πŸŽ₯. I'm all for free press and fair criticism, but this is just another way for Trump to silence his critics and control the narrative πŸ’”. Can we please not lose our 1st Amendment rights in the process? πŸ™ We need journalists to hold him accountable and ask tough questions. This list is a total overreach πŸ‘Ž.
 
πŸš¨πŸ“° I'm getting a bad vibe from this... it feels like they're trying to intimidate people into not saying what they think 🀐. A "Media Offender" list? Sounds like a bunch of hooey to me πŸ˜’. What's next, labeling news organizations that report on climate change as "deniers"? 🌑️ It's just another example of Trump's disdain for the press and his desire to control the narrative πŸ“°πŸ’”.

And have you seen those outlets they've listed? CBS News, The Independent, The Boston Globe? Some of my favorite sources! 🀝 I mean, I know we're all human and can make mistakes, but to label them as "media offenders" is just ridiculous πŸ˜‚. It's like they think the truth doesn't matter anymore πŸ’―.

I'm worried about where this is going... if you can't criticize the president without being labeled a "media offender", what's the point of journalism? πŸ€” We need journalists who are willing to take on tough topics and ask hard questions, not just yes-men and sycophants πŸ‘Š
 
πŸ“°πŸ’₯ This is getting crazy! I'm not surprised, tbh. I've been saying it for ages - if you don't like what a journalist has to say, sue them or change the story, but try to silence them? That's just not how democracy works πŸ€–. And now they're labeling these outlets "media offenders" and claiming they shared malicious stories about Trump? Like, come on! It sounds super fishy to me 🐟. The White House is basically saying that dissenting voices are a threat to national security... nope, that's just not true πŸ’―. Can't wait to see how this plays out πŸ‘€.
 
omg can u believe dis? 🀯

so like, according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center, 70% of americans trust the media to report the news accurately, while only 26% trust trump to make decisions in the best interest of the country πŸ€”. that's a pretty big gap!

and btw, have u seen this graph from the center for politics & media showing how press freedom has declined under trump? πŸ“Š it's not good

also, i'm wondering what the "media offenders" list actually says about the media landscape in the us. like, does it take into account the role of social media platforms and online outlets in shaping public opinion?

anywayz, this whole thing just feels like another way for trump to exert control over the narrative and stifle criticism πŸ“°πŸ’”
 
πŸ€” I'm really worried about what's going on here... a "media offender" list? That sounds like something from a bad 80s movie πŸŽ₯. It's just another way to bully outlets that are doing their job and holding the administration accountable.

I mean, come on... labeling news outlets as "malicious" just because they're reporting facts that don't line up with the White House narrative? That's not journalism, that's propaganda πŸ˜’. And what's next? Labeling journalists who won't cover the president's favorite storylines as "fake news"? No thanks.

This is a big deal for press freedom and it's only going to get worse if we let them get away with this kind of thing 🚫. We need outlets like CBS News, The Independent, and The Boston Globe to keep the administration honest... even if it means they're not getting the attention they want 😊.
 
[Image of a dog with a speech bubble saying "I'm paws-itive they're just trying to muzzle the press!"]

[ GIF of a red stamp with a big X marked through it, accompanied by a thought bubble reading "Free Press? More like 'Fake News'!" ]

[ A picture of a journalist holding a megaphone, with a cityscape in the background and a caption that reads "We won't be silenced!" ]

[ An image of a person trying to fit into a tiny box, labeled "Journalistic Integrity" , with a red X marked through it ]
 
πŸš¨πŸ’” the white house just dropped a list of "media offenders" and it's literally just outlets that are trying to hold trump accountable... like what even is the point of this? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ they're basically saying certain news orgs are bad for sharing fact-checked info about trump, but isn't that kinda their job? πŸ“°πŸ‘€

and have you seen this "seditious" stamp they put on the congresspeople in the video? it's like they're trying to bully journalists into just spewing pro-trump propaganda πŸ€₯ anyone who wants to investigate trump's actions should be able to, not some handpicked "media offenders" list πŸ‘Ž

i'm low-key worried about press freedoms now... if the white house is just gonna start labeling certain outlets as "bad", what's next? are we gonna get a list of "good" and "bad" sources or something? 🀯
 
πŸ“°πŸ‘Š This new "Media Offender" list by the White House is a total power play, folks! They're basically saying that if you criticize Trump, you're not just biased, you're malicious πŸ€₯. And let's be real, who wouldn't want to label outlets like CBS News and The Independent as "seditious"? πŸ˜‚ It's a slippery slope, my friends. Next thing you know, they'll be labeling all the other liberal outlets as "media offenders" too πŸ“°πŸ˜‘.

And what's with this nonsense about Trump giving "lawful" orders? Did we just become a dictatorship where the president can do whatever he wants and call it "law"? 😱 The fact that they're using lawsuits against TV networks, booting legacy outlets from the press pool, and restricting access to the White House is all part of this campaign to silence dissenting voices 🀐.

This move by the White House is a huge overreach, in my opinion. It's a clear attempt to stifle free speech and control the narrative around Trump's presidency πŸ“°πŸ’₯. The press should be holding our leaders accountable, not being told what to say or think πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. This is a major erosion of press freedoms, and we need to speak out against it! πŸ‘Š
 
πŸ“°πŸ˜¬ I gotta say, this new initiative from the White House is really shady πŸ€₯. They're basically labeling these news outlets as "media offenders" just because they're reporting on stuff that might not be entirely positive about Trump πŸ“Š. It's like, isn't a free press supposed to cover all sides of the story? And what's with this whole "seditious" thing? That sounds super ominous 🚨.

I mean, I get it, no one likes being criticized in public, but come on, that's what journalism is all about πŸ€”. If the White House can just label someone as a "media offender" and that's an end to it, then we've got bigger problems than just press freedom πŸ‘Š. This feels like a huge overreach to me.
 
Umm I'm getting really worried about what's going on with the media freedom in this country πŸ€•, like they're basically trying to dictate who gets to say what, and who doesn't. News outlets that actually hold the president accountable are being labeled as "media offenders" and it's just so shady. The idea of a "seditious" label is straight up chilling, like, who decides what's seditious anyway? πŸ€”
 
I'm getting really frustrated with how platforms are handling sensitive topics like free speech. I mean, have you seen this list from the White House? It's just another example of how media outlets get labeled as "media offenders" and suddenly they're facing backlash. 🀯 And then there's the whole video thing with that red stamp saying "seditious". It's like, okay, what even is that supposed to mean?

It feels like no matter which side you're on, this kind of labeling just sets up a toxic cycle. On one hand, you've got outlets being targeted for supposedly spreading false information, but at the same time, there's a real risk that journalists will self-censor or get too afraid to report on certain topics. And don't even get me started on the whole "dangerous" thing – it sounds like a thinly veiled attack on press freedoms to me.

I swear, sometimes I feel like we're more focused on policing each other's opinions than actually engaging in constructive dialogue. πŸ€” Can't we just try to have an open and honest conversation without resorting to these kind of tactics?
 
this is just so depressing πŸ€•. it feels like we're living in a world where the truth is whatever they say it is, and anyone who dares to question that gets branded a "media offender" πŸ’”. what's next? labeling people who speak out against climate change as "deniers"? or calling scientists "misinformed" just because their findings don't fit the administration's narrative 🌑️.

i think this is exactly what happens when we let politicians get too close to the levers of power and forget that they're supposed to serve us, not the other way around πŸ’ͺ. the whole idea of press freedoms is about holding those in power accountable for their actions, but if you silence the ones who are speaking out, you essentially silence the truth itself πŸ”‡.

it's like we're losing ourselves in this sea of propaganda and misinformation 🌊. i fear for the future of our democracy if we can't even trust our journalists to tell us what's going on πŸ’”.
 
πŸ™Œ I'm so worried about this "Media Offender" list πŸ“°πŸ˜¬. It feels like they're trying to intimidate people who just want to tell the truth πŸ€”. The fact that it's targeting outlets that have actually done some investigative reporting is concerning πŸ“Š. As a journalist myself, I know how hard we work to get our stories right πŸ‘.

I also don't think it's fair to label entire news organizations as "media offenders" without even giving them a chance to respond πŸ’¬. It's like they're assuming everyone in these outlets is out to get Trump πŸ˜’. News outlets should be able to report on anyone, regardless of whether you agree with their views 🀝.

This move just feels like another way for the administration to silence dissenting voices πŸ‘Š. We need a free press that can hold those in power accountable πŸ’ͺ. This list is just going to push more people underground 🀫, which could be really bad for democracy πŸ—³οΈ.
 
I'm literally SHAKING 😱 over this one... Like, what's next? The White House just starts fact-checking everyone's Twitter thoughts too? 🀯 I get it, criticism can be tough to take, but this is just ridiculous. They're basically saying that if you don't like Trump's policies or opinions, you're a "media offender" and deserve to be shamed. 🚫 That's not how democracy works, folks! We need a free press to hold our leaders accountable, not some blacklist of "seditious" congresspeople. What's next? Silencing opposing viewpoints at rallies? πŸ”Š This whole thing just feels like another way for Trump to stifle dissent and consolidate his grip on power. 😡
 
omg have u heard about dis new thing the white house just dropped ?? 🀯 they made a list of outlets that r supposed to be "media offenders" aka ones that criticize trump lol like what even is that?? πŸ™„ it's like they're trying to silence ppl who are just doing their job . and now they're labeling news orgs as "malicious" idk about u but that sounds super sketchy to me 😳 i mean we already know the white house has been cracking down on press freedoms with all these lawsuits and whatnot. this new list just seems like another way for them to control the narrative and shut down dissenting voices 🀫 news orgs should be able to report on whatever they want without fear of retribution . u think dis is gonna happen in our country?? 😟
 
omg like what r they even doin?? 🀯 they think labeling outlets as "media offenders" is gonna stop ppl from speakin out against trump?? its just another way to silence critics & stifle free speech lol who else thinks this is a major slippery slope? πŸ€₯ i mean i get it, trump can be super divisive but come on, dont try to control the narrative like that. isnt freedom of the press part of our constitution or somethin? πŸ“°πŸ’ͺ
 
omg u guys i cant even right now this whole thing with the media offender list is soooo sus like what even is the point of labeling outlets as "media offenders" are they gonna start fining them or something idk but it just feels like another way for trump's admin to silence people who dont agree with them and honestly its kinda scary cuz if u r a journalist and u criticize trump ur life could be ruined like what if u get sued or blacklisted or something

i also dont get why theyre making such a big deal about the stuff that happened with the dems warning the military servicemembers it sounds like a legit thing to me but i guess if trump thinks its a "malicious" story then maybe we should investigate
 
I'm not buying it πŸ€”. This "Media Offender" list is just another way to stifle dissenting voices and silence critics, right? I mean, what's next? Creating a "Truth-Teller" list for outlets that actually get the story straight? πŸ“° The White House is trying to control the narrative around Trump's presidency and it's not going to work. Journalists are supposed to hold those in power accountable, not be afraid to report on the things that need reporting on.

And what's with the "seditious" stamp? That's just a fancy way of saying they're not afraid to tell the truth πŸ™„. If the president is so sure his orders were lawful, why release this list and try to shame these outlets for doing their job? It's all just a big PR stunt to make Trump look good, and it's not going to fly with anyone who actually cares about press freedoms πŸ’₯
 
Back
Top